Cargando…
Cost–Utility Analysis of Open Radical Hysterectomy Compared to Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated by minimally invasive surgery show shorter progression-free and overall survival compared to open surgery. This study integrated minimally invasive and open surgery survival data with surgery costs and utilities and conducted a cost-e...
Autores principales: | Michaan, Nadav, Leshno, Moshe, Fire, Gil, Safra, Tamar, Rosenberg, Michal, Peleg-Hasson, Shira, Grisaru, Dan, Laskov, Ido |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37686601 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15174325 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for BRCA gene mutation carriers: a cost effectiveness analysis
por: Michaan, Nadav, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Concomitant diagnosis of endometrial and breast cancer - does the sequence matters?
por: Stern, Tomer, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Röseler, Jona, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Classical radical hysterectomy and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Makowski, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2014)