Cargando…

Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance

People differ considerably in the extent to which they benefit from working memory (WM) training. Although there is increasing research focusing on individual differences associated with WM training outcomes, we still lack an understanding of which specific individual differences, and in what combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Yi, Pahor, Anja, Seitz, Aaron R., Barbour, Dennis L., Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692193
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.319
_version_ 1785103165582999552
author Feng, Yi
Pahor, Anja
Seitz, Aaron R.
Barbour, Dennis L.
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
author_facet Feng, Yi
Pahor, Anja
Seitz, Aaron R.
Barbour, Dennis L.
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
author_sort Feng, Yi
collection PubMed
description People differ considerably in the extent to which they benefit from working memory (WM) training. Although there is increasing research focusing on individual differences associated with WM training outcomes, we still lack an understanding of which specific individual differences, and in what combination, contribute to inter-individual variations in training trajectories. In the current study, 568 undergraduates completed one of several N-back intervention variants over the course of two weeks. Participants’ training trajectories were clustered into three distinct training patterns (high performers, intermediate performers, and low performers). We applied machine-learning algorithms to train a binary tree model to predict individuals’ training patterns relying on several individual difference variables that have been identified as relevant in previous literature. These individual difference variables included pre-existing cognitive abilities, personality characteristics, motivational factors, video game experience, health status, bilingualism, and socioeconomic status. We found that our classification model showed good predictive power in distinguishing between high performers and relatively lower performers. Furthermore, we found that openness and pre-existing WM capacity to be the two most important factors in distinguishing between high and low performers. However, among low performers, openness and video game background were the most significant predictors of their learning persistence. In conclusion, it is possible to predict individual training performance using participant characteristics before training, which could inform the development of personalized interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10487130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104871302023-09-09 Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance Feng, Yi Pahor, Anja Seitz, Aaron R. Barbour, Dennis L. Jaeggi, Susanne M. J Cogn Research Article People differ considerably in the extent to which they benefit from working memory (WM) training. Although there is increasing research focusing on individual differences associated with WM training outcomes, we still lack an understanding of which specific individual differences, and in what combination, contribute to inter-individual variations in training trajectories. In the current study, 568 undergraduates completed one of several N-back intervention variants over the course of two weeks. Participants’ training trajectories were clustered into three distinct training patterns (high performers, intermediate performers, and low performers). We applied machine-learning algorithms to train a binary tree model to predict individuals’ training patterns relying on several individual difference variables that have been identified as relevant in previous literature. These individual difference variables included pre-existing cognitive abilities, personality characteristics, motivational factors, video game experience, health status, bilingualism, and socioeconomic status. We found that our classification model showed good predictive power in distinguishing between high performers and relatively lower performers. Furthermore, we found that openness and pre-existing WM capacity to be the two most important factors in distinguishing between high and low performers. However, among low performers, openness and video game background were the most significant predictors of their learning persistence. In conclusion, it is possible to predict individual training performance using participant characteristics before training, which could inform the development of personalized interventions. Ubiquity Press 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10487130/ /pubmed/37692193 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.319 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feng, Yi
Pahor, Anja
Seitz, Aaron R.
Barbour, Dennis L.
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance
title Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance
title_full Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance
title_fullStr Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance
title_full_unstemmed Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance
title_short Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance
title_sort unicorn, hare, or tortoise? using machine learning to predict working memory training performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692193
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/joc.319
work_keys_str_mv AT fengyi unicornhareortortoiseusingmachinelearningtopredictworkingmemorytrainingperformance
AT pahoranja unicornhareortortoiseusingmachinelearningtopredictworkingmemorytrainingperformance
AT seitzaaronr unicornhareortortoiseusingmachinelearningtopredictworkingmemorytrainingperformance
AT barbourdennisl unicornhareortortoiseusingmachinelearningtopredictworkingmemorytrainingperformance
AT jaeggisusannem unicornhareortortoiseusingmachinelearningtopredictworkingmemorytrainingperformance