Cargando…

Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review

The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Suárez, Claudio-Alberto, González-de la Torre, Héctor, Hernández-De Luis, María-Naira, Fernández-Gutiérrez, Domingo-Ángel, Martínez-Alberto, Carlos-Enrique, Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172449
_version_ 1785103329780563968
author Rodríguez-Suárez, Claudio-Alberto
González-de la Torre, Héctor
Hernández-De Luis, María-Naira
Fernández-Gutiérrez, Domingo-Ángel
Martínez-Alberto, Carlos-Enrique
Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
author_facet Rodríguez-Suárez, Claudio-Alberto
González-de la Torre, Héctor
Hernández-De Luis, María-Naira
Fernández-Gutiérrez, Domingo-Ángel
Martínez-Alberto, Carlos-Enrique
Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
author_sort Rodríguez-Suárez, Claudio-Alberto
collection PubMed
description The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals’ health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses’ interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10487812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104878122023-09-09 Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review Rodríguez-Suárez, Claudio-Alberto González-de la Torre, Héctor Hernández-De Luis, María-Naira Fernández-Gutiérrez, Domingo-Ángel Martínez-Alberto, Carlos-Enrique Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán Healthcare (Basel) Review The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals’ health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses’ interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process. MDPI 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10487812/ /pubmed/37685482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172449 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rodríguez-Suárez, Claudio-Alberto
González-de la Torre, Héctor
Hernández-De Luis, María-Naira
Fernández-Gutiérrez, Domingo-Ángel
Martínez-Alberto, Carlos-Enrique
Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
title Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
title_full Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
title_short Effectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Review
title_sort effectiveness of a standardized nursing process using nanda international, nursing interventions classification and nursing outcome classification terminologies: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172449
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezsuarezclaudioalberto effectivenessofastandardizednursingprocessusingnandainternationalnursinginterventionsclassificationandnursingoutcomeclassificationterminologiesasystematicreview
AT gonzalezdelatorrehector effectivenessofastandardizednursingprocessusingnandainternationalnursinginterventionsclassificationandnursingoutcomeclassificationterminologiesasystematicreview
AT hernandezdeluismarianaira effectivenessofastandardizednursingprocessusingnandainternationalnursinginterventionsclassificationandnursingoutcomeclassificationterminologiesasystematicreview
AT fernandezgutierrezdomingoangel effectivenessofastandardizednursingprocessusingnandainternationalnursinginterventionsclassificationandnursingoutcomeclassificationterminologiesasystematicreview
AT martinezalbertocarlosenrique effectivenessofastandardizednursingprocessusingnandainternationalnursinginterventionsclassificationandnursingoutcomeclassificationterminologiesasystematicreview
AT britobritopedroruyman effectivenessofastandardizednursingprocessusingnandainternationalnursinginterventionsclassificationandnursingoutcomeclassificationterminologiesasystematicreview