Cargando…
A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVision(TM) system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175476 |
_version_ | 1785103374638645248 |
---|---|
author | Lee, So Yeon Kim, Joong Baek Lee, Jung Woong Woo, A Mi Kim, Chang Jae Chung, Mee Young Moon, Ho Sik |
author_facet | Lee, So Yeon Kim, Joong Baek Lee, Jung Woong Woo, A Mi Kim, Chang Jae Chung, Mee Young Moon, Ho Sik |
author_sort | Lee, So Yeon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVision(TM) system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The purpose of this study was to analyze correlations between the NRS and the current perception threshold (CPT), pain equivalent current (PEC), and quantified pain degree (QPD). Methods: Medical records of 398 subjects who visited the pain clinic in a university hospital from March 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the pain degree, NRS, CPT, PEC, and QPD were measured. Subjects were categorized into two groups: the Pain group (n = 355) and the No-pain group (n = 43). Results: The NRS showed a negative correlation with CPT (R = −0.10, p = 0.054) and a positive correlation with QPD (R = 0.13, p = 0.008). Among various diseases, only spinal disease patients showed a negative correlation between CPT and NRS (R = −0.22, p = 0.003). Additionally, there were significant differences in CPT and QPD between the Pain and No-pain groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: CPT and QPD measured using the PainVision(TM) system could be used to estimate pain intensity and the presence of pain. These parameters would be considered useful for predicting pain itself and its intensity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10487999 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104879992023-09-09 A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study Lee, So Yeon Kim, Joong Baek Lee, Jung Woong Woo, A Mi Kim, Chang Jae Chung, Mee Young Moon, Ho Sik J Clin Med Article Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVision(TM) system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The purpose of this study was to analyze correlations between the NRS and the current perception threshold (CPT), pain equivalent current (PEC), and quantified pain degree (QPD). Methods: Medical records of 398 subjects who visited the pain clinic in a university hospital from March 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the pain degree, NRS, CPT, PEC, and QPD were measured. Subjects were categorized into two groups: the Pain group (n = 355) and the No-pain group (n = 43). Results: The NRS showed a negative correlation with CPT (R = −0.10, p = 0.054) and a positive correlation with QPD (R = 0.13, p = 0.008). Among various diseases, only spinal disease patients showed a negative correlation between CPT and NRS (R = −0.22, p = 0.003). Additionally, there were significant differences in CPT and QPD between the Pain and No-pain groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: CPT and QPD measured using the PainVision(TM) system could be used to estimate pain intensity and the presence of pain. These parameters would be considered useful for predicting pain itself and its intensity. MDPI 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10487999/ /pubmed/37685543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175476 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, So Yeon Kim, Joong Baek Lee, Jung Woong Woo, A Mi Kim, Chang Jae Chung, Mee Young Moon, Ho Sik A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study |
title | A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | quantitative measure of pain with current perception threshold, pain equivalent current, and quantified pain degree: a retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487999/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesoyeon aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT kimjoongbaek aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT leejungwoong aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT wooami aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT kimchangjae aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT chungmeeyoung aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT moonhosik aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT leesoyeon quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT kimjoongbaek quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT leejungwoong quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT wooami quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT kimchangjae quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT chungmeeyoung quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy AT moonhosik quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy |