Cargando…

A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study

Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVision(TM) system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, So Yeon, Kim, Joong Baek, Lee, Jung Woong, Woo, A Mi, Kim, Chang Jae, Chung, Mee Young, Moon, Ho Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175476
_version_ 1785103374638645248
author Lee, So Yeon
Kim, Joong Baek
Lee, Jung Woong
Woo, A Mi
Kim, Chang Jae
Chung, Mee Young
Moon, Ho Sik
author_facet Lee, So Yeon
Kim, Joong Baek
Lee, Jung Woong
Woo, A Mi
Kim, Chang Jae
Chung, Mee Young
Moon, Ho Sik
author_sort Lee, So Yeon
collection PubMed
description Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVision(TM) system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The purpose of this study was to analyze correlations between the NRS and the current perception threshold (CPT), pain equivalent current (PEC), and quantified pain degree (QPD). Methods: Medical records of 398 subjects who visited the pain clinic in a university hospital from March 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the pain degree, NRS, CPT, PEC, and QPD were measured. Subjects were categorized into two groups: the Pain group (n = 355) and the No-pain group (n = 43). Results: The NRS showed a negative correlation with CPT (R = −0.10, p = 0.054) and a positive correlation with QPD (R = 0.13, p = 0.008). Among various diseases, only spinal disease patients showed a negative correlation between CPT and NRS (R = −0.22, p = 0.003). Additionally, there were significant differences in CPT and QPD between the Pain and No-pain groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: CPT and QPD measured using the PainVision(TM) system could be used to estimate pain intensity and the presence of pain. These parameters would be considered useful for predicting pain itself and its intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10487999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104879992023-09-09 A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study Lee, So Yeon Kim, Joong Baek Lee, Jung Woong Woo, A Mi Kim, Chang Jae Chung, Mee Young Moon, Ho Sik J Clin Med Article Background: As a subjective sensation, pain is difficult to evaluate objectively. The assessment of pain degree is largely dependent on subjective methods such as the numeric rating scale (NRS). The PainVision(TM) system has recently been introduced as an objective pain degree measurement tool. The purpose of this study was to analyze correlations between the NRS and the current perception threshold (CPT), pain equivalent current (PEC), and quantified pain degree (QPD). Methods: Medical records of 398 subjects who visited the pain clinic in a university hospital from March 2017 to February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the pain degree, NRS, CPT, PEC, and QPD were measured. Subjects were categorized into two groups: the Pain group (n = 355) and the No-pain group (n = 43). Results: The NRS showed a negative correlation with CPT (R = −0.10, p = 0.054) and a positive correlation with QPD (R = 0.13, p = 0.008). Among various diseases, only spinal disease patients showed a negative correlation between CPT and NRS (R = −0.22, p = 0.003). Additionally, there were significant differences in CPT and QPD between the Pain and No-pain groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: CPT and QPD measured using the PainVision(TM) system could be used to estimate pain intensity and the presence of pain. These parameters would be considered useful for predicting pain itself and its intensity. MDPI 2023-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10487999/ /pubmed/37685543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175476 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, So Yeon
Kim, Joong Baek
Lee, Jung Woong
Woo, A Mi
Kim, Chang Jae
Chung, Mee Young
Moon, Ho Sik
A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
title A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
title_full A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
title_short A Quantitative Measure of Pain with Current Perception Threshold, Pain Equivalent Current, and Quantified Pain Degree: A Retrospective Study
title_sort quantitative measure of pain with current perception threshold, pain equivalent current, and quantified pain degree: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10487999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175476
work_keys_str_mv AT leesoyeon aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT kimjoongbaek aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT leejungwoong aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT wooami aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT kimchangjae aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT chungmeeyoung aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT moonhosik aquantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT leesoyeon quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT kimjoongbaek quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT leejungwoong quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT wooami quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT kimchangjae quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT chungmeeyoung quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy
AT moonhosik quantitativemeasureofpainwithcurrentperceptionthresholdpainequivalentcurrentandquantifiedpaindegreearetrospectivestudy