Cargando…

Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations

Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gashimova, Elina M., Temerdashev, Azamat Z., Perunov, Dmitry V., Porkhanov, Vladimir A., Polyakov, Igor S., Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37686155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713350
_version_ 1785103392012500992
author Gashimova, Elina M.
Temerdashev, Azamat Z.
Perunov, Dmitry V.
Porkhanov, Vladimir A.
Polyakov, Igor S.
Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V.
author_facet Gashimova, Elina M.
Temerdashev, Azamat Z.
Perunov, Dmitry V.
Porkhanov, Vladimir A.
Polyakov, Igor S.
Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V.
author_sort Gashimova, Elina M.
collection PubMed
description Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selectivity to other diseases, particularly, cancer of other localizations. This paper is devoted to the study of the variability of exhaled breath samples among patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, such as esophageal, breast, colorectal, kidney, stomach, prostate, cervix, and skin. For this, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used. Two classification models were built. The first model separated patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations. The second model classified patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer. Mann–Whitney U tests and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were applied to identify differences in investigated groups. Discriminant analysis (DA), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were applied to create the models. In the case of classifying lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, average sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 69%, respectively. However, the accuracy of classifying groups of patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer was poor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10488072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104880722023-09-09 Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations Gashimova, Elina M. Temerdashev, Azamat Z. Perunov, Dmitry V. Porkhanov, Vladimir A. Polyakov, Igor S. Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V. Int J Mol Sci Article Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selectivity to other diseases, particularly, cancer of other localizations. This paper is devoted to the study of the variability of exhaled breath samples among patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, such as esophageal, breast, colorectal, kidney, stomach, prostate, cervix, and skin. For this, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used. Two classification models were built. The first model separated patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations. The second model classified patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer. Mann–Whitney U tests and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were applied to identify differences in investigated groups. Discriminant analysis (DA), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were applied to create the models. In the case of classifying lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, average sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 69%, respectively. However, the accuracy of classifying groups of patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer was poor. MDPI 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10488072/ /pubmed/37686155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713350 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gashimova, Elina M.
Temerdashev, Azamat Z.
Perunov, Dmitry V.
Porkhanov, Vladimir A.
Polyakov, Igor S.
Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V.
Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
title Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
title_full Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
title_fullStr Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
title_full_unstemmed Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
title_short Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
title_sort selectivity of exhaled breath biomarkers of lung cancer in relation to cancer of other localizations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37686155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713350
work_keys_str_mv AT gashimovaelinam selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations
AT temerdashevazamatz selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations
AT perunovdmitryv selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations
AT porkhanovvladimira selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations
AT polyakovigors selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations
AT dmitrievaekaterinav selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations