Cargando…
Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations
Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37686155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713350 |
_version_ | 1785103392012500992 |
---|---|
author | Gashimova, Elina M. Temerdashev, Azamat Z. Perunov, Dmitry V. Porkhanov, Vladimir A. Polyakov, Igor S. Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V. |
author_facet | Gashimova, Elina M. Temerdashev, Azamat Z. Perunov, Dmitry V. Porkhanov, Vladimir A. Polyakov, Igor S. Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V. |
author_sort | Gashimova, Elina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selectivity to other diseases, particularly, cancer of other localizations. This paper is devoted to the study of the variability of exhaled breath samples among patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, such as esophageal, breast, colorectal, kidney, stomach, prostate, cervix, and skin. For this, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used. Two classification models were built. The first model separated patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations. The second model classified patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer. Mann–Whitney U tests and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were applied to identify differences in investigated groups. Discriminant analysis (DA), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were applied to create the models. In the case of classifying lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, average sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 69%, respectively. However, the accuracy of classifying groups of patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer was poor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10488072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104880722023-09-09 Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations Gashimova, Elina M. Temerdashev, Azamat Z. Perunov, Dmitry V. Porkhanov, Vladimir A. Polyakov, Igor S. Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V. Int J Mol Sci Article Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, mostly due to diagnostics in the advanced stage. Therefore, the development of a quick, simple, and non-invasive diagnostic tool to identify cancer is essential. However, the creation of a reliable diagnostic tool is possible only in case of selectivity to other diseases, particularly, cancer of other localizations. This paper is devoted to the study of the variability of exhaled breath samples among patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, such as esophageal, breast, colorectal, kidney, stomach, prostate, cervix, and skin. For this, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used. Two classification models were built. The first model separated patients with lung cancer and cancer of other localizations. The second model classified patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer. Mann–Whitney U tests and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were applied to identify differences in investigated groups. Discriminant analysis (DA), gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT), and artificial neural networks (ANN) were applied to create the models. In the case of classifying lung cancer and cancer of other localizations, average sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 69%, respectively. However, the accuracy of classifying groups of patients with lung, esophageal, breast, colorectal, and kidney cancer was poor. MDPI 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10488072/ /pubmed/37686155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713350 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gashimova, Elina M. Temerdashev, Azamat Z. Perunov, Dmitry V. Porkhanov, Vladimir A. Polyakov, Igor S. Dmitrieva, Ekaterina V. Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations |
title | Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations |
title_full | Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations |
title_fullStr | Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations |
title_full_unstemmed | Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations |
title_short | Selectivity of Exhaled Breath Biomarkers of Lung Cancer in Relation to Cancer of Other Localizations |
title_sort | selectivity of exhaled breath biomarkers of lung cancer in relation to cancer of other localizations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37686155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gashimovaelinam selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations AT temerdashevazamatz selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations AT perunovdmitryv selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations AT porkhanovvladimira selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations AT polyakovigors selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations AT dmitrievaekaterinav selectivityofexhaledbreathbiomarkersoflungcancerinrelationtocancerofotherlocalizations |