Cargando…

Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused

Background: Delirium is difficult to measure in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It is possible that by considering the rate of screening, incidence, and rate of treatment with antipsychotic medications (APMs) for suspected delirium, a clearer picture can emerge. Methods: A retrospective, observationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez, F. Eduardo, Tee, Rebecca, Poulter, Amber-Louise, Jordan, Leah, Bell, Liam, Balogh, Zsolt J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685738
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175671
_version_ 1785103465119219712
author Martinez, F. Eduardo
Tee, Rebecca
Poulter, Amber-Louise
Jordan, Leah
Bell, Liam
Balogh, Zsolt J.
author_facet Martinez, F. Eduardo
Tee, Rebecca
Poulter, Amber-Louise
Jordan, Leah
Bell, Liam
Balogh, Zsolt J.
author_sort Martinez, F. Eduardo
collection PubMed
description Background: Delirium is difficult to measure in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It is possible that by considering the rate of screening, incidence, and rate of treatment with antipsychotic medications (APMs) for suspected delirium, a clearer picture can emerge. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted at two ICUs in Australia, between April and June of 2020. All adult ICU patients were screened; those who spoke English and did not have previous neurocognitive pathology or intracranial pathology were included in the analysis. Data were collected from the hospitals’ electronic medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of delirium based on the use of the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU). Secondary outcomes included measures of screening for delirium, treatment of suspected delirium with APMs, and identifying clinical factors associated with both delirium and the use of APMs. Results: From 736 patients that were screened, 665 were included in the analysis. The incidence of delirium was 11.3% (75/665); on average, the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) was performed every 2.9 h and CAM-ICU every 40 h. RASS was not performed in 8.4% (56/665) of patients and CAM-ICU was not performed in 40.6% (270/665) of patients. A total of 17% (113/665) of patients were prescribed an APM, with quetiapine being the most used. ICU length of stay (LOS), APACHE-III score, and the use of alpha-2 agonists were associated with the presence of delirium, while ICU LOS, the use of alpha-2 agonists, and the presence of delirium were associated with patients receiving APMs. Conclusions: The incidence of delirium was lower than previously reported, at 11.3%. The rate of screening for delirium was low, while the use of APMs for delirium was higher than the incidence of delirium. It is possible that the true incidence is higher than what was measured. Critical prospective assessment is required to optimize APM indications in the ICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10488395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104883952023-09-09 Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused Martinez, F. Eduardo Tee, Rebecca Poulter, Amber-Louise Jordan, Leah Bell, Liam Balogh, Zsolt J. J Clin Med Article Background: Delirium is difficult to measure in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It is possible that by considering the rate of screening, incidence, and rate of treatment with antipsychotic medications (APMs) for suspected delirium, a clearer picture can emerge. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted at two ICUs in Australia, between April and June of 2020. All adult ICU patients were screened; those who spoke English and did not have previous neurocognitive pathology or intracranial pathology were included in the analysis. Data were collected from the hospitals’ electronic medical records. The primary outcome was incidence of delirium based on the use of the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU). Secondary outcomes included measures of screening for delirium, treatment of suspected delirium with APMs, and identifying clinical factors associated with both delirium and the use of APMs. Results: From 736 patients that were screened, 665 were included in the analysis. The incidence of delirium was 11.3% (75/665); on average, the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) was performed every 2.9 h and CAM-ICU every 40 h. RASS was not performed in 8.4% (56/665) of patients and CAM-ICU was not performed in 40.6% (270/665) of patients. A total of 17% (113/665) of patients were prescribed an APM, with quetiapine being the most used. ICU length of stay (LOS), APACHE-III score, and the use of alpha-2 agonists were associated with the presence of delirium, while ICU LOS, the use of alpha-2 agonists, and the presence of delirium were associated with patients receiving APMs. Conclusions: The incidence of delirium was lower than previously reported, at 11.3%. The rate of screening for delirium was low, while the use of APMs for delirium was higher than the incidence of delirium. It is possible that the true incidence is higher than what was measured. Critical prospective assessment is required to optimize APM indications in the ICU. MDPI 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10488395/ /pubmed/37685738 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175671 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martinez, F. Eduardo
Tee, Rebecca
Poulter, Amber-Louise
Jordan, Leah
Bell, Liam
Balogh, Zsolt J.
Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused
title Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused
title_full Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused
title_fullStr Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused
title_full_unstemmed Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused
title_short Delirium Screening and Pharmacotherapy in the ICU: The Patients Are Not the Only Ones Confused
title_sort delirium screening and pharmacotherapy in the icu: the patients are not the only ones confused
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37685738
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175671
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezfeduardo deliriumscreeningandpharmacotherapyintheicuthepatientsarenottheonlyonesconfused
AT teerebecca deliriumscreeningandpharmacotherapyintheicuthepatientsarenottheonlyonesconfused
AT poulteramberlouise deliriumscreeningandpharmacotherapyintheicuthepatientsarenottheonlyonesconfused
AT jordanleah deliriumscreeningandpharmacotherapyintheicuthepatientsarenottheonlyonesconfused
AT bellliam deliriumscreeningandpharmacotherapyintheicuthepatientsarenottheonlyonesconfused
AT baloghzsoltj deliriumscreeningandpharmacotherapyintheicuthepatientsarenottheonlyonesconfused