Cargando…

Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes

According to Bader’s quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), the simultaneous presence of a bond path and the corresponding bond critical point between any two atoms is both a necessary and sufficient condition for the atoms to be bonded to one another. In principle, this means that this pair...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jabłoński, Mirosław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37687183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176353
_version_ 1785103754726473728
author Jabłoński, Mirosław
author_facet Jabłoński, Mirosław
author_sort Jabłoński, Mirosław
collection PubMed
description According to Bader’s quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), the simultaneous presence of a bond path and the corresponding bond critical point between any two atoms is both a necessary and sufficient condition for the atoms to be bonded to one another. In principle, this means that this pair of atoms should make a stabilizing contribution to the molecular system. However, the multitude of so-called counterintuitive bond paths strongly suggests that this statement is not necessarily true. Particularly ‘troublesome’ are endohedral complexes, in which encapsulation-enforced proximity between the trapped guest (e.g., an atom) and the host’s cage system usually ‘produces’ many counterintuitive bond paths. In the author’s opinion, the best evidence to demonstrate the repulsive nature of the intra-cage guest⋯host interaction is the use of some trapping systems containing small escape channels and then showing that the initially trapped entity spontaneously escapes outside the host’s cage during geometry optimization of the initially built guest@host endohedral complex. For this purpose, a group of 24 Ng@[3 [Formula: see text]]cyclophane (3 [Formula: see text] 6) endohedral complexes is used. As a result, arguments are presented showing that Bader’s topological bond path does not necessarily indicate a stabilizing interaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104900632023-09-09 Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes Jabłoński, Mirosław Molecules Article According to Bader’s quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), the simultaneous presence of a bond path and the corresponding bond critical point between any two atoms is both a necessary and sufficient condition for the atoms to be bonded to one another. In principle, this means that this pair of atoms should make a stabilizing contribution to the molecular system. However, the multitude of so-called counterintuitive bond paths strongly suggests that this statement is not necessarily true. Particularly ‘troublesome’ are endohedral complexes, in which encapsulation-enforced proximity between the trapped guest (e.g., an atom) and the host’s cage system usually ‘produces’ many counterintuitive bond paths. In the author’s opinion, the best evidence to demonstrate the repulsive nature of the intra-cage guest⋯host interaction is the use of some trapping systems containing small escape channels and then showing that the initially trapped entity spontaneously escapes outside the host’s cage during geometry optimization of the initially built guest@host endohedral complex. For this purpose, a group of 24 Ng@[3 [Formula: see text]]cyclophane (3 [Formula: see text] 6) endohedral complexes is used. As a result, arguments are presented showing that Bader’s topological bond path does not necessarily indicate a stabilizing interaction. MDPI 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10490063/ /pubmed/37687183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176353 Text en © 2023 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jabłoński, Mirosław
Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
title Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
title_full Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
title_fullStr Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
title_short Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3(n)]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
title_sort bader’s topological bond path does not necessarily indicate stabilizing interaction—proof studies based on the ng@[3(n)]cyclophane endohedral complexes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37687183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176353
work_keys_str_mv AT jabłonskimirosław baderstopologicalbondpathdoesnotnecessarilyindicatestabilizinginteractionproofstudiesbasedontheng3ncyclophaneendohedralcomplexes