Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments

Quantifying thoracic spine mobility with reliable and valid tools is a challenge for clinicians in practice. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a smartphone device, bubble inclinometer and universal goniometer to quantify the static kyphotic curve and active range...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Baalen, Gabriela Bella, Vanwanseele, Benedicte, Venter, Ranel Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37688076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177622
_version_ 1785103867671740416
author van Baalen, Gabriela Bella
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Venter, Ranel Rachel
author_facet van Baalen, Gabriela Bella
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Venter, Ranel Rachel
author_sort van Baalen, Gabriela Bella
collection PubMed
description Quantifying thoracic spine mobility with reliable and valid tools is a challenge for clinicians in practice. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a smartphone device, bubble inclinometer and universal goniometer to quantify the static kyphotic curve and active range of motion of the thoracic spine. A total of 17 participants (mean age = 23.7 ± 2.3 years) underwent repeated measurements with three raters, on three separate days performing the lumbar-locked trunk rotation, standing full extension, standing full flexion, standing relaxed curve and seated trunk rotation assessments. Mostly “Good” to “Excellent” intra-rater (ICC ranging from 0.624 to 0.981) and inter-reliability (ICC ranging from 0.671 to 0.968) was achieved with the smartphone and clinical tools. “Excellent” validity (ICC ranging from 0.903 to 0.947) with the smartphone was achieved during lumbar-locked trunk rotation and standing relaxed curve assessment. “Good” validity (ICC ranging from 0.836 to 0.867) of the smartphone was achieved during the seated trunk rotation. The Samsung s9+ smartphone with the iSetSquare mobile application is a reliable and valid tool to use for clinical assessments assessing thoracic spine mobility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104905602023-09-09 Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments van Baalen, Gabriela Bella Vanwanseele, Benedicte Venter, Ranel Rachel Sensors (Basel) Article Quantifying thoracic spine mobility with reliable and valid tools is a challenge for clinicians in practice. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a smartphone device, bubble inclinometer and universal goniometer to quantify the static kyphotic curve and active range of motion of the thoracic spine. A total of 17 participants (mean age = 23.7 ± 2.3 years) underwent repeated measurements with three raters, on three separate days performing the lumbar-locked trunk rotation, standing full extension, standing full flexion, standing relaxed curve and seated trunk rotation assessments. Mostly “Good” to “Excellent” intra-rater (ICC ranging from 0.624 to 0.981) and inter-reliability (ICC ranging from 0.671 to 0.968) was achieved with the smartphone and clinical tools. “Excellent” validity (ICC ranging from 0.903 to 0.947) with the smartphone was achieved during lumbar-locked trunk rotation and standing relaxed curve assessment. “Good” validity (ICC ranging from 0.836 to 0.867) of the smartphone was achieved during the seated trunk rotation. The Samsung s9+ smartphone with the iSetSquare mobile application is a reliable and valid tool to use for clinical assessments assessing thoracic spine mobility. MDPI 2023-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10490560/ /pubmed/37688076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177622 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
van Baalen, Gabriela Bella
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Venter, Ranel Rachel
Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
title Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
title_full Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
title_short Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
title_sort reliability and validity of a smartphone device and clinical tools for thoracic spine mobility assessments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37688076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177622
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbaalengabrielabella reliabilityandvalidityofasmartphonedeviceandclinicaltoolsforthoracicspinemobilityassessments
AT vanwanseelebenedicte reliabilityandvalidityofasmartphonedeviceandclinicaltoolsforthoracicspinemobilityassessments
AT venterranelrachel reliabilityandvalidityofasmartphonedeviceandclinicaltoolsforthoracicspinemobilityassessments