Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments
Quantifying thoracic spine mobility with reliable and valid tools is a challenge for clinicians in practice. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a smartphone device, bubble inclinometer and universal goniometer to quantify the static kyphotic curve and active range...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37688076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177622 |
_version_ | 1785103867671740416 |
---|---|
author | van Baalen, Gabriela Bella Vanwanseele, Benedicte Venter, Ranel Rachel |
author_facet | van Baalen, Gabriela Bella Vanwanseele, Benedicte Venter, Ranel Rachel |
author_sort | van Baalen, Gabriela Bella |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantifying thoracic spine mobility with reliable and valid tools is a challenge for clinicians in practice. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a smartphone device, bubble inclinometer and universal goniometer to quantify the static kyphotic curve and active range of motion of the thoracic spine. A total of 17 participants (mean age = 23.7 ± 2.3 years) underwent repeated measurements with three raters, on three separate days performing the lumbar-locked trunk rotation, standing full extension, standing full flexion, standing relaxed curve and seated trunk rotation assessments. Mostly “Good” to “Excellent” intra-rater (ICC ranging from 0.624 to 0.981) and inter-reliability (ICC ranging from 0.671 to 0.968) was achieved with the smartphone and clinical tools. “Excellent” validity (ICC ranging from 0.903 to 0.947) with the smartphone was achieved during lumbar-locked trunk rotation and standing relaxed curve assessment. “Good” validity (ICC ranging from 0.836 to 0.867) of the smartphone was achieved during the seated trunk rotation. The Samsung s9+ smartphone with the iSetSquare mobile application is a reliable and valid tool to use for clinical assessments assessing thoracic spine mobility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10490560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104905602023-09-09 Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments van Baalen, Gabriela Bella Vanwanseele, Benedicte Venter, Ranel Rachel Sensors (Basel) Article Quantifying thoracic spine mobility with reliable and valid tools is a challenge for clinicians in practice. The aim of this study is to determine the reliability and validity of a smartphone device, bubble inclinometer and universal goniometer to quantify the static kyphotic curve and active range of motion of the thoracic spine. A total of 17 participants (mean age = 23.7 ± 2.3 years) underwent repeated measurements with three raters, on three separate days performing the lumbar-locked trunk rotation, standing full extension, standing full flexion, standing relaxed curve and seated trunk rotation assessments. Mostly “Good” to “Excellent” intra-rater (ICC ranging from 0.624 to 0.981) and inter-reliability (ICC ranging from 0.671 to 0.968) was achieved with the smartphone and clinical tools. “Excellent” validity (ICC ranging from 0.903 to 0.947) with the smartphone was achieved during lumbar-locked trunk rotation and standing relaxed curve assessment. “Good” validity (ICC ranging from 0.836 to 0.867) of the smartphone was achieved during the seated trunk rotation. The Samsung s9+ smartphone with the iSetSquare mobile application is a reliable and valid tool to use for clinical assessments assessing thoracic spine mobility. MDPI 2023-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10490560/ /pubmed/37688076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177622 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article van Baalen, Gabriela Bella Vanwanseele, Benedicte Venter, Ranel Rachel Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments |
title | Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone Device and Clinical Tools for Thoracic Spine Mobility Assessments |
title_sort | reliability and validity of a smartphone device and clinical tools for thoracic spine mobility assessments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37688076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanbaalengabrielabella reliabilityandvalidityofasmartphonedeviceandclinicaltoolsforthoracicspinemobilityassessments AT vanwanseelebenedicte reliabilityandvalidityofasmartphonedeviceandclinicaltoolsforthoracicspinemobilityassessments AT venterranelrachel reliabilityandvalidityofasmartphonedeviceandclinicaltoolsforthoracicspinemobilityassessments |