Cargando…

Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case

Dashcams are considered video sensors, and the number of dashcams installed in vehicles is increasing. Native dashcam video players can be used to view evidence during investigations, but these players are not accepted in court and cannot be used to extract metadata. Digital forensic tools, such as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daraghmi, Yousef-Awwad, Shawahna, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37688004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177548
_version_ 1785103900419817472
author Daraghmi, Yousef-Awwad
Shawahna, Ibrahim
author_facet Daraghmi, Yousef-Awwad
Shawahna, Ibrahim
author_sort Daraghmi, Yousef-Awwad
collection PubMed
description Dashcams are considered video sensors, and the number of dashcams installed in vehicles is increasing. Native dashcam video players can be used to view evidence during investigations, but these players are not accepted in court and cannot be used to extract metadata. Digital forensic tools, such as FTK, Autopsy and Encase, are specifically designed for functions and scripts and do not perform well in extracting metadata. Therefore, this paper proposes a dashcam forensics framework for extracting evidential text including time, date, speed, GPS coordinates and speed units using accurate optical character recognition methods. The framework also transcribes evidential speech related to lane departure and collision warning for enabling automatic analysis. The proposed framework associates the spatial and temporal evidential data with a map, enabling investigators to review the evidence along the vehicle’s trip. The framework was evaluated using real-life videos, and different optical character recognition (OCR) methods and speech-to-text conversion methods were tested. This paper identifies that Tesseract is the most accurate OCR method that can be used to extract text from dashcam videos. Also, the Google speech-to-text API is the most accurate, while Mozilla’s DeepSpeech is more acceptable because it works offline. The framework was compared with other digital forensic tools, such as Belkasoft, and the framework was found to be more effective as it allows automatic analysis of dashcam evidence and generates digital forensic reports associated with a map displaying the evidence along the trip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104906972023-09-09 Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case Daraghmi, Yousef-Awwad Shawahna, Ibrahim Sensors (Basel) Article Dashcams are considered video sensors, and the number of dashcams installed in vehicles is increasing. Native dashcam video players can be used to view evidence during investigations, but these players are not accepted in court and cannot be used to extract metadata. Digital forensic tools, such as FTK, Autopsy and Encase, are specifically designed for functions and scripts and do not perform well in extracting metadata. Therefore, this paper proposes a dashcam forensics framework for extracting evidential text including time, date, speed, GPS coordinates and speed units using accurate optical character recognition methods. The framework also transcribes evidential speech related to lane departure and collision warning for enabling automatic analysis. The proposed framework associates the spatial and temporal evidential data with a map, enabling investigators to review the evidence along the vehicle’s trip. The framework was evaluated using real-life videos, and different optical character recognition (OCR) methods and speech-to-text conversion methods were tested. This paper identifies that Tesseract is the most accurate OCR method that can be used to extract text from dashcam videos. Also, the Google speech-to-text API is the most accurate, while Mozilla’s DeepSpeech is more acceptable because it works offline. The framework was compared with other digital forensic tools, such as Belkasoft, and the framework was found to be more effective as it allows automatic analysis of dashcam evidence and generates digital forensic reports associated with a map displaying the evidence along the trip. MDPI 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10490697/ /pubmed/37688004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177548 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Daraghmi, Yousef-Awwad
Shawahna, Ibrahim
Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
title Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
title_full Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
title_fullStr Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
title_full_unstemmed Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
title_short Digital Forensic Analysis of Vehicular Video Sensors: Dashcams as a Case
title_sort digital forensic analysis of vehicular video sensors: dashcams as a case
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37688004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177548
work_keys_str_mv AT daraghmiyousefawwad digitalforensicanalysisofvehicularvideosensorsdashcamsasacase
AT shawahnaibrahim digitalforensicanalysisofvehicularvideosensorsdashcamsasacase