Cargando…

Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the RSQ Motion sensor and its validity against the Propriometer and electronic goniometer in measuring the active range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder. The study included 15 volunteers (mean age 24.73 ± 3.31) without any clinical symptoms with no hist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaszyński, Jakub, Baka, Cezary, Białecka, Martyna, Lubiatowski, Przemysław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37687955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177499
_version_ 1785103911740243968
author Kaszyński, Jakub
Baka, Cezary
Białecka, Martyna
Lubiatowski, Przemysław
author_facet Kaszyński, Jakub
Baka, Cezary
Białecka, Martyna
Lubiatowski, Przemysław
author_sort Kaszyński, Jakub
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the RSQ Motion sensor and its validity against the Propriometer and electronic goniometer in measuring the active range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder. The study included 15 volunteers (mean age 24.73 ± 3.31) without any clinical symptoms with no history of trauma, disease, or surgery to the upper limb. Four movements were tested: flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation. Validation was assessed in the full range of active shoulder motion. Reliability was revised in full active ROM, a fixed angle of 90 degrees for flexion and abduction, and 45 degrees for internal and external rotation. Each participant was assessed three times: on the first day by both testers and on the second day only by one of the testers. Goniometer and RSQ Motion sensors showed moderate to excellent correlation for all tested movements (ICC 0.61–0.97, LOA < 23 degrees). Analysis of inter-rater reliability showed good to excellent agreement between both testers (ICC 0.74–0.97, LOA 13–35 degrees). Analysis of intra-rater reliability showed moderate to a good agreement (ICC 0.7–0.88, LOA 22–37 degrees). The shoulder internal and external rotation measurement with RSQ Motion sensors is valid and reliable. There is a high level of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the RSQ Motion sensors and Propriometer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104907452023-09-09 Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability Kaszyński, Jakub Baka, Cezary Białecka, Martyna Lubiatowski, Przemysław Sensors (Basel) Article This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the RSQ Motion sensor and its validity against the Propriometer and electronic goniometer in measuring the active range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder. The study included 15 volunteers (mean age 24.73 ± 3.31) without any clinical symptoms with no history of trauma, disease, or surgery to the upper limb. Four movements were tested: flexion, abduction, external and internal rotation. Validation was assessed in the full range of active shoulder motion. Reliability was revised in full active ROM, a fixed angle of 90 degrees for flexion and abduction, and 45 degrees for internal and external rotation. Each participant was assessed three times: on the first day by both testers and on the second day only by one of the testers. Goniometer and RSQ Motion sensors showed moderate to excellent correlation for all tested movements (ICC 0.61–0.97, LOA < 23 degrees). Analysis of inter-rater reliability showed good to excellent agreement between both testers (ICC 0.74–0.97, LOA 13–35 degrees). Analysis of intra-rater reliability showed moderate to a good agreement (ICC 0.7–0.88, LOA 22–37 degrees). The shoulder internal and external rotation measurement with RSQ Motion sensors is valid and reliable. There is a high level of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the RSQ Motion sensors and Propriometer. MDPI 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10490745/ /pubmed/37687955 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177499 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kaszyński, Jakub
Baka, Cezary
Białecka, Martyna
Lubiatowski, Przemysław
Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability
title Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability
title_full Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability
title_fullStr Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability
title_full_unstemmed Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability
title_short Shoulder Range of Motion Measurement Using Inertial Measurement Unit–Concurrent Validity and Reliability
title_sort shoulder range of motion measurement using inertial measurement unit–concurrent validity and reliability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37687955
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177499
work_keys_str_mv AT kaszynskijakub shoulderrangeofmotionmeasurementusinginertialmeasurementunitconcurrentvalidityandreliability
AT bakacezary shoulderrangeofmotionmeasurementusinginertialmeasurementunitconcurrentvalidityandreliability
AT białeckamartyna shoulderrangeofmotionmeasurementusinginertialmeasurementunitconcurrentvalidityandreliability
AT lubiatowskiprzemysław shoulderrangeofmotionmeasurementusinginertialmeasurementunitconcurrentvalidityandreliability