Cargando…

Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor

Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen and an important indoor and outdoor air pollutant. However, current strategies for formaldehyde measurement, such as chromatographic and optical techniques, are expensive and labor intensive. Low-cost gas sensors have been emerging to provide effective measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pei, Zheyuan, Balitskiy, Maxim, Thalman, Ryan, Kelly, Kerry E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37687899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177444
_version_ 1785103930136461312
author Pei, Zheyuan
Balitskiy, Maxim
Thalman, Ryan
Kelly, Kerry E.
author_facet Pei, Zheyuan
Balitskiy, Maxim
Thalman, Ryan
Kelly, Kerry E.
author_sort Pei, Zheyuan
collection PubMed
description Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen and an important indoor and outdoor air pollutant. However, current strategies for formaldehyde measurement, such as chromatographic and optical techniques, are expensive and labor intensive. Low-cost gas sensors have been emerging to provide effective measurement of air pollutants. In this study, we evaluated eight low-cost electrochemical formaldehyde sensors (SFA30, Sensirion(®), Staefa, Switzerland) in the laboratory with a broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy as the reference instrument. As a group, the sensors exhibited good linearity of response (R(2) > 0.95), low limit of detection (11.3 ± 2.07 ppb), good accuracy (3.96 ± 0.33 ppb and 6.2 ± 0.3% N), acceptable repeatability (3.46% averaged coefficient of variation), reasonably fast response (131–439 s) and moderate inter-sensor variability (0.551 intraclass correlation coefficient) over the formaldehyde concentration range of 0–76 ppb. We also systematically investigated the effects of temperature and relative humidity on sensor response, and the results showed that formaldehyde concentration was the most important contributor to sensor response, followed by temperature, and relative humidity. The results suggest the feasibility of using this low-cost electrochemical sensor to measure formaldehyde concentrations at relevant concentration ranges in indoor and outdoor environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104908222023-09-09 Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor Pei, Zheyuan Balitskiy, Maxim Thalman, Ryan Kelly, Kerry E. Sensors (Basel) Article Formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen and an important indoor and outdoor air pollutant. However, current strategies for formaldehyde measurement, such as chromatographic and optical techniques, are expensive and labor intensive. Low-cost gas sensors have been emerging to provide effective measurement of air pollutants. In this study, we evaluated eight low-cost electrochemical formaldehyde sensors (SFA30, Sensirion(®), Staefa, Switzerland) in the laboratory with a broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy as the reference instrument. As a group, the sensors exhibited good linearity of response (R(2) > 0.95), low limit of detection (11.3 ± 2.07 ppb), good accuracy (3.96 ± 0.33 ppb and 6.2 ± 0.3% N), acceptable repeatability (3.46% averaged coefficient of variation), reasonably fast response (131–439 s) and moderate inter-sensor variability (0.551 intraclass correlation coefficient) over the formaldehyde concentration range of 0–76 ppb. We also systematically investigated the effects of temperature and relative humidity on sensor response, and the results showed that formaldehyde concentration was the most important contributor to sensor response, followed by temperature, and relative humidity. The results suggest the feasibility of using this low-cost electrochemical sensor to measure formaldehyde concentrations at relevant concentration ranges in indoor and outdoor environments. MDPI 2023-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10490822/ /pubmed/37687899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177444 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pei, Zheyuan
Balitskiy, Maxim
Thalman, Ryan
Kelly, Kerry E.
Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor
title Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor
title_full Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor
title_fullStr Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor
title_short Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor
title_sort laboratory performance evaluation of a low-cost electrochemical formaldehyde sensor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37687899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23177444
work_keys_str_mv AT peizheyuan laboratoryperformanceevaluationofalowcostelectrochemicalformaldehydesensor
AT balitskiymaxim laboratoryperformanceevaluationofalowcostelectrochemicalformaldehydesensor
AT thalmanryan laboratoryperformanceevaluationofalowcostelectrochemicalformaldehydesensor
AT kellykerrye laboratoryperformanceevaluationofalowcostelectrochemicalformaldehydesensor