Cargando…

Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data

BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common gynecologic condition. Although it can be a sign of uterine cancer, most patients have benign etiology. However, research on quality of diagnostic evaluation for PMB has been limited to cancer patients. To extend this research, we examined the ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xiao, Chen, Ling, Nunez-Smith, Marcella, Clark, Mitchell, Wright, Jason D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289692
_version_ 1785103944353054720
author Xu, Xiao
Chen, Ling
Nunez-Smith, Marcella
Clark, Mitchell
Wright, Jason D.
author_facet Xu, Xiao
Chen, Ling
Nunez-Smith, Marcella
Clark, Mitchell
Wright, Jason D.
author_sort Xu, Xiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common gynecologic condition. Although it can be a sign of uterine cancer, most patients have benign etiology. However, research on quality of diagnostic evaluation for PMB has been limited to cancer patients. To extend this research, we examined the timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for PMB among patients with benign conditions. METHODS: Using the 2008–2019 MarketScan Research Databases, we identified 499176 patients (456741 with commercial insurance and 42435 with Medicaid insurance) who presented with PMB but did not have gynecologic cancer. For each patient, we measured the time from their PMB reporting to the date of their first diagnostic procedure. The association between patient characteristics and time to first diagnostic procedure was examined using Cox proportional hazards models (for the overall sample and then stratified by insurance type). RESULTS: Overall, 54.3% of patients received a diagnostic procedure on the same day when they reported PMB and 86.6% received a diagnostic procedure within 12 months after reporting PMB. These percentages were 39.4% and 77.1%, respectively, for Medicaid patients, compared to 55.7% and 87.4%, respectively, for commercially insured patients (p<0.001 for both). Medicaid patients had an 18% lower rate of receiving a diagnostic procedure at any given time point than commercially insured patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.81–0.83). Meanwhile, older age and non-gynecologic comorbidities were associated with a lower rate whereas concomitant gynecologic conditions and recent use of preventive care were associated with a higher rate of receiving diagnostic procedures. Analysis stratified by insurance type identified additional risk factors for delayed diagnostic procedures (e.g., non-metropolitan versus metropolitan location for commercially insured patients and Black versus White race for Medicaid patients). CONCLUSION: A sizable proportion of patients did not receive prompt diagnostic evaluation for PMB. Both clinical and non-clinical factors could affect timeliness of evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104908842023-09-09 Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data Xu, Xiao Chen, Ling Nunez-Smith, Marcella Clark, Mitchell Wright, Jason D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common gynecologic condition. Although it can be a sign of uterine cancer, most patients have benign etiology. However, research on quality of diagnostic evaluation for PMB has been limited to cancer patients. To extend this research, we examined the timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for PMB among patients with benign conditions. METHODS: Using the 2008–2019 MarketScan Research Databases, we identified 499176 patients (456741 with commercial insurance and 42435 with Medicaid insurance) who presented with PMB but did not have gynecologic cancer. For each patient, we measured the time from their PMB reporting to the date of their first diagnostic procedure. The association between patient characteristics and time to first diagnostic procedure was examined using Cox proportional hazards models (for the overall sample and then stratified by insurance type). RESULTS: Overall, 54.3% of patients received a diagnostic procedure on the same day when they reported PMB and 86.6% received a diagnostic procedure within 12 months after reporting PMB. These percentages were 39.4% and 77.1%, respectively, for Medicaid patients, compared to 55.7% and 87.4%, respectively, for commercially insured patients (p<0.001 for both). Medicaid patients had an 18% lower rate of receiving a diagnostic procedure at any given time point than commercially insured patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.81–0.83). Meanwhile, older age and non-gynecologic comorbidities were associated with a lower rate whereas concomitant gynecologic conditions and recent use of preventive care were associated with a higher rate of receiving diagnostic procedures. Analysis stratified by insurance type identified additional risk factors for delayed diagnostic procedures (e.g., non-metropolitan versus metropolitan location for commercially insured patients and Black versus White race for Medicaid patients). CONCLUSION: A sizable proportion of patients did not receive prompt diagnostic evaluation for PMB. Both clinical and non-clinical factors could affect timeliness of evaluation. Public Library of Science 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10490884/ /pubmed/37682914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289692 Text en © 2023 Xu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Xiao
Chen, Ling
Nunez-Smith, Marcella
Clark, Mitchell
Wright, Jason D.
Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data
title Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data
title_full Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data
title_fullStr Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data
title_full_unstemmed Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data
title_short Timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: A retrospective cohort study using claims data
title_sort timeliness of diagnostic evaluation for postmenopausal bleeding: a retrospective cohort study using claims data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289692
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiao timelinessofdiagnosticevaluationforpostmenopausalbleedingaretrospectivecohortstudyusingclaimsdata
AT chenling timelinessofdiagnosticevaluationforpostmenopausalbleedingaretrospectivecohortstudyusingclaimsdata
AT nunezsmithmarcella timelinessofdiagnosticevaluationforpostmenopausalbleedingaretrospectivecohortstudyusingclaimsdata
AT clarkmitchell timelinessofdiagnosticevaluationforpostmenopausalbleedingaretrospectivecohortstudyusingclaimsdata
AT wrightjasond timelinessofdiagnosticevaluationforpostmenopausalbleedingaretrospectivecohortstudyusingclaimsdata