Cargando…

Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: A large portion of published evidence syntheses (ES) do not conform to established standards. There is a growing number of reviews labeled as a “systematized review”, but authors do not always identify specific methodological adaptations or specify the biases these may introduce. OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Premji, Zahra, Cabugos, Leyla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291145
_version_ 1785103948891291648
author Premji, Zahra
Cabugos, Leyla
author_facet Premji, Zahra
Cabugos, Leyla
author_sort Premji, Zahra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A large portion of published evidence syntheses (ES) do not conform to established standards. There is a growing number of reviews labeled as a “systematized review”, but authors do not always identify specific methodological adaptations or specify the biases these may introduce. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to identify which methodological attributes common to evidence syntheses (ES) are implemented or referenced in published systematized reviews. It also aims to 1) identify and collate, where available, the reasons authors characterize their study as a systematized review 2) determine whether any justifications provided were based on resource constraints or research goals, and 3) describe common characteristics of systematized reviews. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All articles that are titled as a systematized review, attempt a collocation and synthesis of existing literature, and include some methodology for their review process, will be included. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A title search will be conducted for the terms “systematized” or “systematised” in proximity to the term “review” in a selection of scholarly sources that offer broad coverage of literature in many disciplines: Google Scholar, Lens, Web of Science Core Collection (Web of Science platform), Scopus (Elsevier platform), MEDLINE (Ovid platform). Screening and data extraction will be done in duplicate. Screening will be conducted in Covidence. Data extraction will be done in Google sheets. Data extraction elements will include common methodological characteristics relating to various steps of the evidence synthesis process. Descriptive, aggregate statistics, and categorization of reasons for selecting the systematized review type are the primary planned analysis for this review. DATA AVAILABILITY: This is a registered report protocol. The data collected in this research project will be made available in the Borealis repository (https://borealisdata.ca/) upon finalization of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10490901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104909012023-09-09 Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol Premji, Zahra Cabugos, Leyla PLoS One Registered Report Protocol INTRODUCTION: A large portion of published evidence syntheses (ES) do not conform to established standards. There is a growing number of reviews labeled as a “systematized review”, but authors do not always identify specific methodological adaptations or specify the biases these may introduce. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to identify which methodological attributes common to evidence syntheses (ES) are implemented or referenced in published systematized reviews. It also aims to 1) identify and collate, where available, the reasons authors characterize their study as a systematized review 2) determine whether any justifications provided were based on resource constraints or research goals, and 3) describe common characteristics of systematized reviews. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All articles that are titled as a systematized review, attempt a collocation and synthesis of existing literature, and include some methodology for their review process, will be included. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A title search will be conducted for the terms “systematized” or “systematised” in proximity to the term “review” in a selection of scholarly sources that offer broad coverage of literature in many disciplines: Google Scholar, Lens, Web of Science Core Collection (Web of Science platform), Scopus (Elsevier platform), MEDLINE (Ovid platform). Screening and data extraction will be done in duplicate. Screening will be conducted in Covidence. Data extraction will be done in Google sheets. Data extraction elements will include common methodological characteristics relating to various steps of the evidence synthesis process. Descriptive, aggregate statistics, and categorization of reasons for selecting the systematized review type are the primary planned analysis for this review. DATA AVAILABILITY: This is a registered report protocol. The data collected in this research project will be made available in the Borealis repository (https://borealisdata.ca/) upon finalization of the study. Public Library of Science 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10490901/ /pubmed/37682919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291145 Text en © 2023 Premji, Cabugos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Registered Report Protocol
Premji, Zahra
Cabugos, Leyla
Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol
title Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol
title_full Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol
title_short Examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: A scoping review protocol
title_sort examining the meaning and methodological characteristics of the systematized review label: a scoping review protocol
topic Registered Report Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291145
work_keys_str_mv AT premjizahra examiningthemeaningandmethodologicalcharacteristicsofthesystematizedreviewlabelascopingreviewprotocol
AT cabugosleyla examiningthemeaningandmethodologicalcharacteristicsofthesystematizedreviewlabelascopingreviewprotocol