Cargando…

Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported good to excellent outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using allografts for treating severe acetabular bone defects. However, precise information on the impact of allograft type and reconstruction method is not available. MATERIAL AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strahl, André, Boese, Christoph Kolja, Ries, Christian, Hubert, Jan, Beil, Frank Timo, Rolvien, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9
_version_ 1785104073026961408
author Strahl, André
Boese, Christoph Kolja
Ries, Christian
Hubert, Jan
Beil, Frank Timo
Rolvien, Tim
author_facet Strahl, André
Boese, Christoph Kolja
Ries, Christian
Hubert, Jan
Beil, Frank Timo
Rolvien, Tim
author_sort Strahl, André
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported good to excellent outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using allografts for treating severe acetabular bone defects. However, precise information on the impact of allograft type and reconstruction method is not available. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed in Medline and Web of Science including patients with acetabular bone loss classified according to the Paprosky classification who underwent rTHA involving the use of allografts. Studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years published between 1990 and 2021 were included. Kendall correlation was applied to determine the relationship between Paprosky grade and allograft type use. Proportion meta-analyses with 95% confidence interval (CI) were performed to summarize the success of various reconstruction options, including allograft type, fixation method, and reconstruction system. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria encompassing 1561 cases from 1491 patients with an average age of 64 years (range 22–95). The average follow-up period was 7.9 years (range 2–22). Structural bulk and morselized grafts were used in equal proportions for all Paprosky acetabular defect types. Their use increased significantly with the type of acetabular defect (r = 0.69, p = 0.049). The overall success rate ranged from 61.3 to 98.3% with a random effect pooled estimate of 90% [95% CI 87–93]. Trabecular metal augments (93% [76–98]) and shells (97% [84–99]) provided the highest success rates. However, no significant differences between reconstruction systems, allograft types and fixation methods were observed (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the use of bulk or morselized allograft for massive bone loss independent of Paprosky classification type and indicate similar good mid- to long-term outcomes of the different acetabular reconstruction options using allografts. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020223093. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10491513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104915132023-09-10 Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis Strahl, André Boese, Christoph Kolja Ries, Christian Hubert, Jan Beil, Frank Timo Rolvien, Tim Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty INTRODUCTION: Several studies have reported good to excellent outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) using allografts for treating severe acetabular bone defects. However, precise information on the impact of allograft type and reconstruction method is not available. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed in Medline and Web of Science including patients with acetabular bone loss classified according to the Paprosky classification who underwent rTHA involving the use of allografts. Studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years published between 1990 and 2021 were included. Kendall correlation was applied to determine the relationship between Paprosky grade and allograft type use. Proportion meta-analyses with 95% confidence interval (CI) were performed to summarize the success of various reconstruction options, including allograft type, fixation method, and reconstruction system. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria encompassing 1561 cases from 1491 patients with an average age of 64 years (range 22–95). The average follow-up period was 7.9 years (range 2–22). Structural bulk and morselized grafts were used in equal proportions for all Paprosky acetabular defect types. Their use increased significantly with the type of acetabular defect (r = 0.69, p = 0.049). The overall success rate ranged from 61.3 to 98.3% with a random effect pooled estimate of 90% [95% CI 87–93]. Trabecular metal augments (93% [76–98]) and shells (97% [84–99]) provided the highest success rates. However, no significant differences between reconstruction systems, allograft types and fixation methods were observed (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the use of bulk or morselized allograft for massive bone loss independent of Paprosky classification type and indicate similar good mid- to long-term outcomes of the different acetabular reconstruction options using allografts. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42020223093. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10491513/ /pubmed/36971802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Strahl, André
Boese, Christoph Kolja
Ries, Christian
Hubert, Jan
Beil, Frank Timo
Rolvien, Tim
Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36971802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9
work_keys_str_mv AT strahlandre outcomeofdifferentreconstructionoptionsusingallograftsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyforsevereacetabularbonelossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boesechristophkolja outcomeofdifferentreconstructionoptionsusingallograftsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyforsevereacetabularbonelossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rieschristian outcomeofdifferentreconstructionoptionsusingallograftsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyforsevereacetabularbonelossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hubertjan outcomeofdifferentreconstructionoptionsusingallograftsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyforsevereacetabularbonelossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT beilfranktimo outcomeofdifferentreconstructionoptionsusingallograftsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyforsevereacetabularbonelossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rolvientim outcomeofdifferentreconstructionoptionsusingallograftsinrevisiontotalhiparthroplastyforsevereacetabularbonelossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis