Cargando…
Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial
Most aspects of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) have changed dramatically since introduction, but embryo transfer (ET) technique remains largely unaltered. We aimed to determine whether four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers (4D UGET) could improve pregnancy rates when compared with clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41313-z |
_version_ | 1785104098112045056 |
---|---|
author | Nancarrow, L. Tempest, Nicola Lane, S. Homburg, R. Russell, R. Hapangama, D. K. |
author_facet | Nancarrow, L. Tempest, Nicola Lane, S. Homburg, R. Russell, R. Hapangama, D. K. |
author_sort | Nancarrow, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most aspects of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) have changed dramatically since introduction, but embryo transfer (ET) technique remains largely unaltered. We aimed to determine whether four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers (4D UGET) could improve pregnancy rates when compared with clinical touch technique (CTT). This was a single centre open labelled randomised controlled trial in a tertiary fertility centre in the UK. 320 women were randomised on the day of single ET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), secondary outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), miscarriage, pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) and ectopic pregnancy. 4D-UGET resulted in significantly higher CPR [50% vs 36% p = 0.02, OR 1.78 (1.12–2.84)] and LBR [41% vs 28%, p = 0.02, OR 1.77 (1.09–2.87)] when compared to CTT technique. Miscarriage (p = 0.49), PUL (p = 0.14) and ectopic pregnancy (p = 0.96) were similar between the two groups. LBR, from this trial, are significantly higher than the current UK average (41% vs 24%). 4D UGET allows for superior imaging of the uterine cavity, whilst tailoring the embryo deposition point specifically to the patient. Further RCTs are required to determine if these results can be replicated in other units and whether 4D UGET is superior to 2D UGET. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10491625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104916252023-09-10 Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial Nancarrow, L. Tempest, Nicola Lane, S. Homburg, R. Russell, R. Hapangama, D. K. Sci Rep Article Most aspects of in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) have changed dramatically since introduction, but embryo transfer (ET) technique remains largely unaltered. We aimed to determine whether four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers (4D UGET) could improve pregnancy rates when compared with clinical touch technique (CTT). This was a single centre open labelled randomised controlled trial in a tertiary fertility centre in the UK. 320 women were randomised on the day of single ET. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), secondary outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), miscarriage, pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) and ectopic pregnancy. 4D-UGET resulted in significantly higher CPR [50% vs 36% p = 0.02, OR 1.78 (1.12–2.84)] and LBR [41% vs 28%, p = 0.02, OR 1.77 (1.09–2.87)] when compared to CTT technique. Miscarriage (p = 0.49), PUL (p = 0.14) and ectopic pregnancy (p = 0.96) were similar between the two groups. LBR, from this trial, are significantly higher than the current UK average (41% vs 24%). 4D UGET allows for superior imaging of the uterine cavity, whilst tailoring the embryo deposition point specifically to the patient. Further RCTs are required to determine if these results can be replicated in other units and whether 4D UGET is superior to 2D UGET. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10491625/ /pubmed/37684296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41313-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Nancarrow, L. Tempest, Nicola Lane, S. Homburg, R. Russell, R. Hapangama, D. K. Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | four-dimensional ultrasound guided embryo transfers improve live birth rates when compared to the clinical touch technique: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41313-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nancarrowl fourdimensionalultrasoundguidedembryotransfersimprovelivebirthrateswhencomparedtotheclinicaltouchtechniquearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tempestnicola fourdimensionalultrasoundguidedembryotransfersimprovelivebirthrateswhencomparedtotheclinicaltouchtechniquearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lanes fourdimensionalultrasoundguidedembryotransfersimprovelivebirthrateswhencomparedtotheclinicaltouchtechniquearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT homburgr fourdimensionalultrasoundguidedembryotransfersimprovelivebirthrateswhencomparedtotheclinicaltouchtechniquearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT russellr fourdimensionalultrasoundguidedembryotransfersimprovelivebirthrateswhencomparedtotheclinicaltouchtechniquearandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hapangamadk fourdimensionalultrasoundguidedembryotransfersimprovelivebirthrateswhencomparedtotheclinicaltouchtechniquearandomisedcontrolledtrial |