Cargando…

Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes

The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kidera, Nobuyuki, Ishikawa, Tomonori, Kawamura, Toshihiro, Miyasaka, Naoyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4
_version_ 1785104106883383296
author Kidera, Nobuyuki
Ishikawa, Tomonori
Kawamura, Toshihiro
Miyasaka, Naoyuki
author_facet Kidera, Nobuyuki
Ishikawa, Tomonori
Kawamura, Toshihiro
Miyasaka, Naoyuki
author_sort Kidera, Nobuyuki
collection PubMed
description The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI and ART outcomes. For 14,605 oocyte retrieval cycles at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020, BMI was divided into five groups (< 18.5, 18.5–20.0, 20.0–22.5, 22.5–25.0, ≥ 25 kg/m(2)) and measured before oocyte retrieval. The normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates were compared. In addition, in the 7,122 frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) with highest-grade embryos, the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were investigated in the five BMI groups. Multiple regression analysis on normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates revealed no statistically significant differences. Furthermore, after propensity score matching on FET, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates in the BMI groups. BMI is a risk factor for complications during pregnancy; however, it does not affect ART outcomes. Therefore, we believe weight guidance should be provided to women with obesity at the start of infertility treatment, but treatment should not be delayed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10491661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104916612023-09-10 Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes Kidera, Nobuyuki Ishikawa, Tomonori Kawamura, Toshihiro Miyasaka, Naoyuki Sci Rep Article The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI and ART outcomes. For 14,605 oocyte retrieval cycles at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020, BMI was divided into five groups (< 18.5, 18.5–20.0, 20.0–22.5, 22.5–25.0, ≥ 25 kg/m(2)) and measured before oocyte retrieval. The normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates were compared. In addition, in the 7,122 frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) with highest-grade embryos, the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were investigated in the five BMI groups. Multiple regression analysis on normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates revealed no statistically significant differences. Furthermore, after propensity score matching on FET, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates in the BMI groups. BMI is a risk factor for complications during pregnancy; however, it does not affect ART outcomes. Therefore, we believe weight guidance should be provided to women with obesity at the start of infertility treatment, but treatment should not be delayed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10491661/ /pubmed/37684397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kidera, Nobuyuki
Ishikawa, Tomonori
Kawamura, Toshihiro
Miyasaka, Naoyuki
Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
title Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
title_full Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
title_fullStr Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
title_short Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
title_sort maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kideranobuyuki maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes
AT ishikawatomonori maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes
AT kawamuratoshihiro maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes
AT miyasakanaoyuki maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes