Cargando…
Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes
The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4 |
_version_ | 1785104106883383296 |
---|---|
author | Kidera, Nobuyuki Ishikawa, Tomonori Kawamura, Toshihiro Miyasaka, Naoyuki |
author_facet | Kidera, Nobuyuki Ishikawa, Tomonori Kawamura, Toshihiro Miyasaka, Naoyuki |
author_sort | Kidera, Nobuyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI and ART outcomes. For 14,605 oocyte retrieval cycles at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020, BMI was divided into five groups (< 18.5, 18.5–20.0, 20.0–22.5, 22.5–25.0, ≥ 25 kg/m(2)) and measured before oocyte retrieval. The normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates were compared. In addition, in the 7,122 frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) with highest-grade embryos, the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were investigated in the five BMI groups. Multiple regression analysis on normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates revealed no statistically significant differences. Furthermore, after propensity score matching on FET, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates in the BMI groups. BMI is a risk factor for complications during pregnancy; however, it does not affect ART outcomes. Therefore, we believe weight guidance should be provided to women with obesity at the start of infertility treatment, but treatment should not be delayed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10491661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104916612023-09-10 Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes Kidera, Nobuyuki Ishikawa, Tomonori Kawamura, Toshihiro Miyasaka, Naoyuki Sci Rep Article The effects of body mass index (BMI) on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes such as ovarian dysfunction, poor ovum quality, and endometrial dysfunction have been studied; however, many aspects remain controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between BMI and ART outcomes. For 14,605 oocyte retrieval cycles at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020, BMI was divided into five groups (< 18.5, 18.5–20.0, 20.0–22.5, 22.5–25.0, ≥ 25 kg/m(2)) and measured before oocyte retrieval. The normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates were compared. In addition, in the 7,122 frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) with highest-grade embryos, the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were investigated in the five BMI groups. Multiple regression analysis on normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates revealed no statistically significant differences. Furthermore, after propensity score matching on FET, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates in the BMI groups. BMI is a risk factor for complications during pregnancy; however, it does not affect ART outcomes. Therefore, we believe weight guidance should be provided to women with obesity at the start of infertility treatment, but treatment should not be delayed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10491661/ /pubmed/37684397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kidera, Nobuyuki Ishikawa, Tomonori Kawamura, Toshihiro Miyasaka, Naoyuki Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
title | Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
title_full | Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
title_fullStr | Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
title_short | Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
title_sort | maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41780-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kideranobuyuki maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes AT ishikawatomonori maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes AT kawamuratoshihiro maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes AT miyasakanaoyuki maternalbodymassindexisnotassociatedwithassistedreproductivetechnologyoutcomes |