Cargando…
Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy?
Introduction The association of acute appendicitis with caecal or colorectal cancer is known. One of the proposed theories for acute appendicitis is luminal blockage by mass at the base of the appendix. There have been no national recommendations or guidelines for follow-up with patients aged 40 and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692620 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43248 |
_version_ | 1785104170720690176 |
---|---|
author | Rajebhosale, Ramprasad P Robinson, Nathan M Kader, Nayaab A Ratnayake, Iyomi Chathurika Sawant, Mitalee H Halahakoon, Vijitha Chandima |
author_facet | Rajebhosale, Ramprasad P Robinson, Nathan M Kader, Nayaab A Ratnayake, Iyomi Chathurika Sawant, Mitalee H Halahakoon, Vijitha Chandima |
author_sort | Rajebhosale, Ramprasad P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction The association of acute appendicitis with caecal or colorectal cancer is known. One of the proposed theories for acute appendicitis is luminal blockage by mass at the base of the appendix. There have been no national recommendations or guidelines for follow-up with patients aged 40 and older after an emergency appendicectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of caecal and colonic cancer or polyps in patients over the age of 40 who have undergone an appendicectomy. This shall enable us to develop the necessary strategies to investigate and diagnose associated caecal and colonic pathology in acute appendicitis to prevent delayed diagnosis of colon cancer. Methods All patients who underwent appendicectomy between October 2011 and October 31, 2021, and who were 40 years of age or older were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients aged 40 to 54 years old and patients 55 years or older underwent subgroup analyses. We looked at any investigations of the colon (CT pneumocolon or colonoscopy) within three years before the appendicectomy or three years after an appendicectomy. All colorectal cancers diagnosed within five years of the index episode of appendicitis were included in the analysis. Results A total of 1076 appendicectomies were performed on patients aged 40 and older during the study period of 10 years. A total of 769 patients were confirmed to have appendicitis on histology. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had colonic investigations within three years of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In our study, 51 of the 769 patients (6.63%) were found to have colorectal neoplasms. Eight patients (8/769, 1.04%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancers, and the occurrence of caecal cancer was 0.26% (2/769). The mortality rate was 75% (6/8) in these patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Four out of six died due to advanced metastatic colonic cancer. In comparison to patients aged 40 to 54, patients over the age of 55 had a statistically significant increased risk of caecal pathology (polyp and cancer) (p = 0.07). Conclusion There seems to be an increased risk of significant colorectal neoplasm in patients over the age of 55 who are admitted with acute appendicitis, and there appears to be an increased severity with a poor prognosis of cancer in these individuals. We recommend the use of routine colonoscopy or CT pneumocolon, particularly for those over the age of 55 who present with acute appendicitis or the histology of appendicular neoplasms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10491947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104919472023-09-10 Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? Rajebhosale, Ramprasad P Robinson, Nathan M Kader, Nayaab A Ratnayake, Iyomi Chathurika Sawant, Mitalee H Halahakoon, Vijitha Chandima Cureus General Surgery Introduction The association of acute appendicitis with caecal or colorectal cancer is known. One of the proposed theories for acute appendicitis is luminal blockage by mass at the base of the appendix. There have been no national recommendations or guidelines for follow-up with patients aged 40 and older after an emergency appendicectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of caecal and colonic cancer or polyps in patients over the age of 40 who have undergone an appendicectomy. This shall enable us to develop the necessary strategies to investigate and diagnose associated caecal and colonic pathology in acute appendicitis to prevent delayed diagnosis of colon cancer. Methods All patients who underwent appendicectomy between October 2011 and October 31, 2021, and who were 40 years of age or older were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients aged 40 to 54 years old and patients 55 years or older underwent subgroup analyses. We looked at any investigations of the colon (CT pneumocolon or colonoscopy) within three years before the appendicectomy or three years after an appendicectomy. All colorectal cancers diagnosed within five years of the index episode of appendicitis were included in the analysis. Results A total of 1076 appendicectomies were performed on patients aged 40 and older during the study period of 10 years. A total of 769 patients were confirmed to have appendicitis on histology. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had colonic investigations within three years of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. In our study, 51 of the 769 patients (6.63%) were found to have colorectal neoplasms. Eight patients (8/769, 1.04%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancers, and the occurrence of caecal cancer was 0.26% (2/769). The mortality rate was 75% (6/8) in these patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Four out of six died due to advanced metastatic colonic cancer. In comparison to patients aged 40 to 54, patients over the age of 55 had a statistically significant increased risk of caecal pathology (polyp and cancer) (p = 0.07). Conclusion There seems to be an increased risk of significant colorectal neoplasm in patients over the age of 55 who are admitted with acute appendicitis, and there appears to be an increased severity with a poor prognosis of cancer in these individuals. We recommend the use of routine colonoscopy or CT pneumocolon, particularly for those over the age of 55 who present with acute appendicitis or the histology of appendicular neoplasms. Cureus 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10491947/ /pubmed/37692620 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43248 Text en Copyright © 2023, Rajebhosale et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Rajebhosale, Ramprasad P Robinson, Nathan M Kader, Nayaab A Ratnayake, Iyomi Chathurika Sawant, Mitalee H Halahakoon, Vijitha Chandima Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? |
title | Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? |
title_full | Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? |
title_fullStr | Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? |
title_short | Is It Worth Considering Colonic Evaluation After Appendicectomy? |
title_sort | is it worth considering colonic evaluation after appendicectomy? |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10491947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692620 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajebhosaleramprasadp isitworthconsideringcolonicevaluationafterappendicectomy AT robinsonnathanm isitworthconsideringcolonicevaluationafterappendicectomy AT kadernayaaba isitworthconsideringcolonicevaluationafterappendicectomy AT ratnayakeiyomichathurika isitworthconsideringcolonicevaluationafterappendicectomy AT sawantmitaleeh isitworthconsideringcolonicevaluationafterappendicectomy AT halahakoonvijithachandima isitworthconsideringcolonicevaluationafterappendicectomy |