Cargando…
Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research
IMPORTANCE: Since the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, an extremely high number of studies have been published worldwide, with variable quality. Research trends of highly cited papers may enable identification of influential research, providing insights for new research ideas; it is therefore importa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32802 |
_version_ | 1785104196657217536 |
---|---|
author | Funada, Satoshi Yoshioka, Takashi Luo, Yan Iwama, Toshi Mori, Chikako Yamada, Naofumi Yoshida, Hideki Katanoda, Kota Furukawa, Toshi A. |
author_facet | Funada, Satoshi Yoshioka, Takashi Luo, Yan Iwama, Toshi Mori, Chikako Yamada, Naofumi Yoshida, Hideki Katanoda, Kota Furukawa, Toshi A. |
author_sort | Funada, Satoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Since the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, an extremely high number of studies have been published worldwide, with variable quality. Research trends of highly cited papers may enable identification of influential research, providing insights for new research ideas; it is therefore important to investigate trends and focus on more influential publications in COVID-19–related studies. OBJECTIVE: To examine research trends of highly cited studies by conducting a bibliometric analysis of highly cited studies in the previous 2 months about COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, Essential Science Indicators (ESI) and Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection were used to find studies with a focus on COVID-19 that were identified as highly cited studies from Clarivate Analytics. Highly cited studies were extracted from the ESI database bimonthly between January 2020 and December 2022. Bibliographic details were extracted from WOS and combined with ESI data using unique accession numbers. The number of highly cited studies was counted based on the fractional counting method. Data were analyzed from January through July 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of publications by research field, country, and institutional affiliation. RESULTS: The number of published COVID-19–related highly cited studies was 14 studies in January to February 2020, peaked at 1292 studies in November to December 2021, and showed a downward trend thereafter, reaching 649 studies in November to December 2022. China had the highest number of highly cited studies per 2-month period until July to August 2020 (138.3 studies vs 103.7 studies for the US, the second highest country), and the US had the greatest number of highly cited studies afterward (159.9 studies vs 157.6 studies for China in September to October 2020). Subsequently, the number of highly cited studies per 2-month period published by China declined (decreasing from 179.7 studies in November to December 2020 to 40.7 studies in September to October 2022), and the UK produced the second largest number of such studies in May to June 2021 (171.3 studies). Similarly, the top 5 institutional affiliations in May to June 2020 by highly cited studies per 2-month period were from China (Huazhong University: 14.7 studies; University of Hong Kong: 6.8 studies; Wuhan University: 4.8 studies; Zhejiang University: 4.5 studies; Fudan University: 4.5 studies), while in November to December 2022, the top 5 institutions were in the US and UK (Harvard University: 15.0 studies; University College London: 11.0 studies; University of Oxford: 10.2 studies; University of London: 9.9 studies; Imperial College London: 5.8 studies). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that the total number of highly cited studies related to COVID-19 peaked at the end of 2021 and showed a downward trend until the end of 2022, while the origin of these studies shifted from China to the US and UK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10492181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104921812023-09-10 Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research Funada, Satoshi Yoshioka, Takashi Luo, Yan Iwama, Toshi Mori, Chikako Yamada, Naofumi Yoshida, Hideki Katanoda, Kota Furukawa, Toshi A. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Since the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak, an extremely high number of studies have been published worldwide, with variable quality. Research trends of highly cited papers may enable identification of influential research, providing insights for new research ideas; it is therefore important to investigate trends and focus on more influential publications in COVID-19–related studies. OBJECTIVE: To examine research trends of highly cited studies by conducting a bibliometric analysis of highly cited studies in the previous 2 months about COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, Essential Science Indicators (ESI) and Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection were used to find studies with a focus on COVID-19 that were identified as highly cited studies from Clarivate Analytics. Highly cited studies were extracted from the ESI database bimonthly between January 2020 and December 2022. Bibliographic details were extracted from WOS and combined with ESI data using unique accession numbers. The number of highly cited studies was counted based on the fractional counting method. Data were analyzed from January through July 2023. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of publications by research field, country, and institutional affiliation. RESULTS: The number of published COVID-19–related highly cited studies was 14 studies in January to February 2020, peaked at 1292 studies in November to December 2021, and showed a downward trend thereafter, reaching 649 studies in November to December 2022. China had the highest number of highly cited studies per 2-month period until July to August 2020 (138.3 studies vs 103.7 studies for the US, the second highest country), and the US had the greatest number of highly cited studies afterward (159.9 studies vs 157.6 studies for China in September to October 2020). Subsequently, the number of highly cited studies per 2-month period published by China declined (decreasing from 179.7 studies in November to December 2020 to 40.7 studies in September to October 2022), and the UK produced the second largest number of such studies in May to June 2021 (171.3 studies). Similarly, the top 5 institutional affiliations in May to June 2020 by highly cited studies per 2-month period were from China (Huazhong University: 14.7 studies; University of Hong Kong: 6.8 studies; Wuhan University: 4.8 studies; Zhejiang University: 4.5 studies; Fudan University: 4.5 studies), while in November to December 2022, the top 5 institutions were in the US and UK (Harvard University: 15.0 studies; University College London: 11.0 studies; University of Oxford: 10.2 studies; University of London: 9.9 studies; Imperial College London: 5.8 studies). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found that the total number of highly cited studies related to COVID-19 peaked at the end of 2021 and showed a downward trend until the end of 2022, while the origin of these studies shifted from China to the US and UK. American Medical Association 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10492181/ /pubmed/37682572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32802 Text en Copyright 2023 Funada S et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Funada, Satoshi Yoshioka, Takashi Luo, Yan Iwama, Toshi Mori, Chikako Yamada, Naofumi Yoshida, Hideki Katanoda, Kota Furukawa, Toshi A. Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research |
title | Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research |
title_full | Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research |
title_fullStr | Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research |
title_short | Global Trends in Highly Cited Studies in COVID-19 Research |
title_sort | global trends in highly cited studies in covid-19 research |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37682572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT funadasatoshi globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT yoshiokatakashi globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT luoyan globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT iwamatoshi globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT morichikako globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT yamadanaofumi globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT yoshidahideki globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT katanodakota globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research AT furukawatoshia globaltrendsinhighlycitedstudiesincovid19research |