Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of bovine brucellosis seroprevalence in Latin America and the Caribbean

INTRODUCTION: Bovine brucellosis is a significant public health problem in countries with economic and zoonotic implications. Although relevant, there are no previous systematic reviews about bovine brucellosis in Latin America. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review in five data-bases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonilla-Aldana, D. Katterine, Trejos-Mendoza, Adrián Esteban, Pérez-Vargas, Soffia, Rivera-Casas, Estefany, Muñoz-Lara, Fausto, Zambrano, Lysien I., Arteaga-Livias, Kovy, Ulloque-Badaracco, Juan R., Alarcon-Braga, Esteban A., Hernandez-Bustamante, Enrique A., Al-kassab-Córdova, Ali, Benites-Zapata, Vicente A., Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101168
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Bovine brucellosis is a significant public health problem in countries with economic and zoonotic implications. Although relevant, there are no previous systematic reviews about bovine brucellosis in Latin America. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review in five data-bases to assess the seroprevalence of Brucella in cattle. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was performed to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). In addition, measures of heterogeneity (Cochran's Q statistic and I(2) test) were reported. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 3,403 articles, of which 65 studies were fully valid for analysis. The pooled seroprevalence for Brucella in bovine (n ​= ​46,883,177) was 4.0% (95%CI: 3.0%–5.0%; p ​< ​0.001), and Venezuela was the country with the highest prevalence (16.0%). By regions, the highest seroprevalence is in Central America and the Caribbean islands (8.0%,95%CI: 3.0%–15.0%; p ​< ​0.001, I(2) ​= ​99.85). CONCLUSIONS: Some countries reported still relevant seroprevalences of bovine brucellosis, especially at the Central America and Caribbean islands. Multiple factors may influence the survival and spread of pathogens in the environment; farms located in regions bordering forest areas, in areas of difficult access to the veterinary service; extensive beef herds raised at pastures with different age and productive groups inter-mingled, and minimal concerns regarding hygiene practices and disease prevention measures. Bovine brucellosis has not been eliminated and needs to be considered with new tools for prevention and control, especially being a zoonosis.