Cargando…

Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal

BACKGROUNDS: Dental procedures involving drilling and grinding can produce a significant amount of suspended aerosol particles (PM) and bioaerosols. This study aims to analyze the size and concentration of aerosol particles generated during drilling and to investigate the effectiveness of two air ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Yaru, Zhao, Fei, Tao, Ran, Liu, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03369-1
_version_ 1785104220851011584
author Du, Yaru
Zhao, Fei
Tao, Ran
Liu, Bing
author_facet Du, Yaru
Zhao, Fei
Tao, Ran
Liu, Bing
author_sort Du, Yaru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Dental procedures involving drilling and grinding can produce a significant amount of suspended aerosol particles (PM) and bioaerosols. This study aims to analyze the size and concentration of aerosol particles generated during drilling and to investigate the effectiveness of two air exchange systems, namely forceful suction (FS) and air disinfection machines (DM), in removing PM. METHODS: For this study, 100 extracted permanent teeth were collected and divided into three groups: without suction (n = 50), suction with forceful suction (n = 25), and suction with air disinfection machines (n = 25). The removal rate of suspended aerosol particles was analyzed using particle counters and air data multimeter. RESULTS: When drilling and grinding were performed without vacuum, 0.75% of the aerosol particles generated were PM2.5-10, 78.25% of total suspended aerosol particles (TSP) were PM2.5, and 98.68% of TSP were PM1. The nanoanalyzer measurements revealed that the aerodynamic diameter of most aerosol particles was below 60 nm, with an average particle diameter of 52.61 nm and an average concentration of 2.6*10(11) ultrafine aerosol particles. The air change per hour (ACH) was significantly lower in the air disinfection machines group compared to the forceful suction group. Additionally, the number of aerosol particles and mass concentration was significantly lower in the air disinfection machines group compared to the forceful suction group in terms of PM2.5 levels. However, the forceful suction group also reduced the mass concentration in PM10 level than the air disinfection machines group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the air exchange system can reduce the aerosol particles generated during drilling and grinding. Comparing the two air exchange systems, it was found that the air disinfection machines group reduces the number of aerosol particles and mass concentration in PM2.5 levels, while the forceful suction group reduces the mass concentration in PM10 level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-03369-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104922902023-09-10 Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal Du, Yaru Zhao, Fei Tao, Ran Liu, Bing BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUNDS: Dental procedures involving drilling and grinding can produce a significant amount of suspended aerosol particles (PM) and bioaerosols. This study aims to analyze the size and concentration of aerosol particles generated during drilling and to investigate the effectiveness of two air exchange systems, namely forceful suction (FS) and air disinfection machines (DM), in removing PM. METHODS: For this study, 100 extracted permanent teeth were collected and divided into three groups: without suction (n = 50), suction with forceful suction (n = 25), and suction with air disinfection machines (n = 25). The removal rate of suspended aerosol particles was analyzed using particle counters and air data multimeter. RESULTS: When drilling and grinding were performed without vacuum, 0.75% of the aerosol particles generated were PM2.5-10, 78.25% of total suspended aerosol particles (TSP) were PM2.5, and 98.68% of TSP were PM1. The nanoanalyzer measurements revealed that the aerodynamic diameter of most aerosol particles was below 60 nm, with an average particle diameter of 52.61 nm and an average concentration of 2.6*10(11) ultrafine aerosol particles. The air change per hour (ACH) was significantly lower in the air disinfection machines group compared to the forceful suction group. Additionally, the number of aerosol particles and mass concentration was significantly lower in the air disinfection machines group compared to the forceful suction group in terms of PM2.5 levels. However, the forceful suction group also reduced the mass concentration in PM10 level than the air disinfection machines group. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the air exchange system can reduce the aerosol particles generated during drilling and grinding. Comparing the two air exchange systems, it was found that the air disinfection machines group reduces the number of aerosol particles and mass concentration in PM2.5 levels, while the forceful suction group reduces the mass concentration in PM10 level. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-023-03369-1. BioMed Central 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10492290/ /pubmed/37684672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03369-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Du, Yaru
Zhao, Fei
Tao, Ran
Liu, Bing
Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
title Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
title_full Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
title_fullStr Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
title_full_unstemmed Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
title_short Effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
title_sort effect of forceful suction and air disinfection machines on aerosol removal
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03369-1
work_keys_str_mv AT duyaru effectofforcefulsuctionandairdisinfectionmachinesonaerosolremoval
AT zhaofei effectofforcefulsuctionandairdisinfectionmachinesonaerosolremoval
AT taoran effectofforcefulsuctionandairdisinfectionmachinesonaerosolremoval
AT liubing effectofforcefulsuctionandairdisinfectionmachinesonaerosolremoval