Cargando…

Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ng, Sharlyn S. T., Oehring, Robert, Ramasetti, Nikitha, Roller, Roland, Thomas, Philippe, Chen, Yuxuan, Moosburner, Simon, Winter, Axel, Maurer, Max-Magnus, Auer, Timo A., Kamali, Can, Pratschke, Johann, Benzing, Christian, Krenzien, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8
_version_ 1785104251197849600
author Ng, Sharlyn S. T.
Oehring, Robert
Ramasetti, Nikitha
Roller, Roland
Thomas, Philippe
Chen, Yuxuan
Moosburner, Simon
Winter, Axel
Maurer, Max-Magnus
Auer, Timo A.
Kamali, Can
Pratschke, Johann
Benzing, Christian
Krenzien, Felix
author_facet Ng, Sharlyn S. T.
Oehring, Robert
Ramasetti, Nikitha
Roller, Roland
Thomas, Philippe
Chen, Yuxuan
Moosburner, Simon
Winter, Axel
Maurer, Max-Magnus
Auer, Timo A.
Kamali, Can
Pratschke, Johann
Benzing, Christian
Krenzien, Felix
author_sort Ng, Sharlyn S. T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. Therapeutic Assistance and Decision algorithms for hepatobiliary tumor Boards (ADBoard) aims to reduce this delay by providing automated data extraction and high-quality, evidence-based treatment recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: With the help of natural language processing, relevant patient information will be automatically extracted from electronic medical records and used to complete a classic tumor conference protocol. A machine learning model is trained on retrospective MDM data and clinical guidelines to recommend treatment options for patients in our inclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomized to either MDM with ADBoard (Arm A: MDM-AB) or conventional MDM (Arm B: MDM-C). The concordance of recommendations of both groups will be compared using interrater reliability. We hypothesize that the therapy recommendations of ADBoard would be in high agreement with those of the MDM-C, with a Cohen’s kappa value of ≥ 0.75. Furthermore, our secondary hypotheses state that the completeness of patient information presented in MDM is higher when using ADBoard than without, and the explainability of tumor board protocols in MDM-AB is higher compared to MDM-C as measured by the System Causability Scale. DISCUSSION: The implementation of ADBoard aims to improve the quality and completeness of the data required for MDM decision-making and to propose therapeutic recommendations that consider current medical evidence and guidelines in a transparent and reproducible manner. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifying number: NCT05681949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949) on 12 January 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104924112023-09-10 Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Ng, Sharlyn S. T. Oehring, Robert Ramasetti, Nikitha Roller, Roland Thomas, Philippe Chen, Yuxuan Moosburner, Simon Winter, Axel Maurer, Max-Magnus Auer, Timo A. Kamali, Can Pratschke, Johann Benzing, Christian Krenzien, Felix Trials Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. Therapeutic Assistance and Decision algorithms for hepatobiliary tumor Boards (ADBoard) aims to reduce this delay by providing automated data extraction and high-quality, evidence-based treatment recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: With the help of natural language processing, relevant patient information will be automatically extracted from electronic medical records and used to complete a classic tumor conference protocol. A machine learning model is trained on retrospective MDM data and clinical guidelines to recommend treatment options for patients in our inclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomized to either MDM with ADBoard (Arm A: MDM-AB) or conventional MDM (Arm B: MDM-C). The concordance of recommendations of both groups will be compared using interrater reliability. We hypothesize that the therapy recommendations of ADBoard would be in high agreement with those of the MDM-C, with a Cohen’s kappa value of ≥ 0.75. Furthermore, our secondary hypotheses state that the completeness of patient information presented in MDM is higher when using ADBoard than without, and the explainability of tumor board protocols in MDM-AB is higher compared to MDM-C as measured by the System Causability Scale. DISCUSSION: The implementation of ADBoard aims to improve the quality and completeness of the data required for MDM decision-making and to propose therapeutic recommendations that consider current medical evidence and guidelines in a transparent and reproducible manner. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifying number: NCT05681949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949) on 12 January 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8. BioMed Central 2023-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10492411/ /pubmed/37684688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ng, Sharlyn S. T.
Oehring, Robert
Ramasetti, Nikitha
Roller, Roland
Thomas, Philippe
Chen, Yuxuan
Moosburner, Simon
Winter, Axel
Maurer, Max-Magnus
Auer, Timo A.
Kamali, Can
Pratschke, Johann
Benzing, Christian
Krenzien, Felix
Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ngsharlynst concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oehringrobert concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramasettinikitha concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rollerroland concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thomasphilippe concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenyuxuan concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moosburnersimon concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT winteraxel concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maurermaxmagnus concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT auertimoa concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kamalican concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pratschkejohann concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT benzingchristian concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT krenzienfelix concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial