Cargando…
Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8 |
_version_ | 1785104251197849600 |
---|---|
author | Ng, Sharlyn S. T. Oehring, Robert Ramasetti, Nikitha Roller, Roland Thomas, Philippe Chen, Yuxuan Moosburner, Simon Winter, Axel Maurer, Max-Magnus Auer, Timo A. Kamali, Can Pratschke, Johann Benzing, Christian Krenzien, Felix |
author_facet | Ng, Sharlyn S. T. Oehring, Robert Ramasetti, Nikitha Roller, Roland Thomas, Philippe Chen, Yuxuan Moosburner, Simon Winter, Axel Maurer, Max-Magnus Auer, Timo A. Kamali, Can Pratschke, Johann Benzing, Christian Krenzien, Felix |
author_sort | Ng, Sharlyn S. T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. Therapeutic Assistance and Decision algorithms for hepatobiliary tumor Boards (ADBoard) aims to reduce this delay by providing automated data extraction and high-quality, evidence-based treatment recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: With the help of natural language processing, relevant patient information will be automatically extracted from electronic medical records and used to complete a classic tumor conference protocol. A machine learning model is trained on retrospective MDM data and clinical guidelines to recommend treatment options for patients in our inclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomized to either MDM with ADBoard (Arm A: MDM-AB) or conventional MDM (Arm B: MDM-C). The concordance of recommendations of both groups will be compared using interrater reliability. We hypothesize that the therapy recommendations of ADBoard would be in high agreement with those of the MDM-C, with a Cohen’s kappa value of ≥ 0.75. Furthermore, our secondary hypotheses state that the completeness of patient information presented in MDM is higher when using ADBoard than without, and the explainability of tumor board protocols in MDM-AB is higher compared to MDM-C as measured by the System Causability Scale. DISCUSSION: The implementation of ADBoard aims to improve the quality and completeness of the data required for MDM decision-making and to propose therapeutic recommendations that consider current medical evidence and guidelines in a transparent and reproducible manner. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifying number: NCT05681949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949) on 12 January 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10492411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104924112023-09-10 Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Ng, Sharlyn S. T. Oehring, Robert Ramasetti, Nikitha Roller, Roland Thomas, Philippe Chen, Yuxuan Moosburner, Simon Winter, Axel Maurer, Max-Magnus Auer, Timo A. Kamali, Can Pratschke, Johann Benzing, Christian Krenzien, Felix Trials Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs), also known as tumor conferences, are a cornerstone of cancer treatments. However, barriers such as incomplete patient information or logistical challenges can postpone tumor board decisions and delay patient treatment, potentially affecting clinical outcomes. Therapeutic Assistance and Decision algorithms for hepatobiliary tumor Boards (ADBoard) aims to reduce this delay by providing automated data extraction and high-quality, evidence-based treatment recommendations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: With the help of natural language processing, relevant patient information will be automatically extracted from electronic medical records and used to complete a classic tumor conference protocol. A machine learning model is trained on retrospective MDM data and clinical guidelines to recommend treatment options for patients in our inclusion criteria. Study participants will be randomized to either MDM with ADBoard (Arm A: MDM-AB) or conventional MDM (Arm B: MDM-C). The concordance of recommendations of both groups will be compared using interrater reliability. We hypothesize that the therapy recommendations of ADBoard would be in high agreement with those of the MDM-C, with a Cohen’s kappa value of ≥ 0.75. Furthermore, our secondary hypotheses state that the completeness of patient information presented in MDM is higher when using ADBoard than without, and the explainability of tumor board protocols in MDM-AB is higher compared to MDM-C as measured by the System Causability Scale. DISCUSSION: The implementation of ADBoard aims to improve the quality and completeness of the data required for MDM decision-making and to propose therapeutic recommendations that consider current medical evidence and guidelines in a transparent and reproducible manner. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifying number: NCT05681949; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05681949) on 12 January 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8. BioMed Central 2023-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10492411/ /pubmed/37684688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ng, Sharlyn S. T. Oehring, Robert Ramasetti, Nikitha Roller, Roland Thomas, Philippe Chen, Yuxuan Moosburner, Simon Winter, Axel Maurer, Max-Magnus Auer, Timo A. Kamali, Can Pratschke, Johann Benzing, Christian Krenzien, Felix Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | concordance of a decision algorithm and multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with liver cancer—a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37684688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07610-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngsharlynst concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oehringrobert concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ramasettinikitha concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rollerroland concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thomasphilippe concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenyuxuan concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT moosburnersimon concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT winteraxel concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maurermaxmagnus concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT auertimoa concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kamalican concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pratschkejohann concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT benzingchristian concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krenzienfelix concordanceofadecisionalgorithmandmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithlivercancerastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |