Cargando…

Clinical practice recommendations for management of lateropulsion after stroke determined by a Delphi expert panel

OBJECTIVE: People exhibiting post-stroke lateropulsion actively push their body across the midline to the more affected side and/or resist weight shift toward the less affected side. Despite its prevalence and associated negative rehabilitation outcomes, no clinical practice guidelines exist for the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nolan, Jessica, Jacques, Angela, Godecke, Erin, Abe, Hiroaki, Babyar, Suzanne, Bergmann, Jeannine, Birnbaum, Melissa, Dai, Shenhao, Danells, Cynthia, Edwards, Taiza GS, Gandolfi, Marialuisa, Jahn, Klaus, Koter, Ryan, Mansfield, Avril, Nakamura, Junji, Pardo, Vicky, Perennou, Dominic, Piscicelli, Celine, Punt, David, Romick-Sheldon, Devra, Saeys, Wim, Smania, Nicola, Vaes, Nathalie, Whitt, Abigail L, Singer, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155231172012
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: People exhibiting post-stroke lateropulsion actively push their body across the midline to the more affected side and/or resist weight shift toward the less affected side. Despite its prevalence and associated negative rehabilitation outcomes, no clinical practice guidelines exist for the rehabilitation of post-stroke lateropulsion. We aimed to develop consensus-based clinical practice recommendations for managing post-stroke lateropulsion using an international expert panel. DESIGN: This Delphi panel process conformed with Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies recommendations. PARTICIPANTS: Panel members had demonstrated clinical and/or scientific background in the rehabilitation of people with post-stroke lateropulsion. MAIN MEASURES: The process consisted of four electronic survey rounds. Round One consisted of 13 open questions. Subsequent rounds ascertained levels of agreement with statements derived from Round One. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement (agree or strongly agree), or ≥70% agreement after excluding ‘unsure’ responses. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed all four rounds. Consensus was achieved regarding a total of 119 recommendations for rehabilitation approaches and considerations for rehabilitation delivery, positioning, managing fear of falling and fatigue, optimal therapy dose, and discharge planning. Statements for which ‘some agreement’ (50%–74% agreement) was achieved and those for which recommendations remain to be clarified were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations build on existing evidence to guide the selection of interventions for post-stroke lateropulsion. Future research is required to elaborate specific rehabilitation strategies, consider the impact of additional cognitive and perceptual impairments, describe positioning options, and detail optimal therapy dose for people with lateropulsion.