Cargando…

Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain

Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eskowich, Sadie, Mackie, Cayley, Wall, Kayla M, Gagnon, Michelle M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591053231161065
_version_ 1785104254492475392
author Eskowich, Sadie
Mackie, Cayley
Wall, Kayla M
Gagnon, Michelle M
author_facet Eskowich, Sadie
Mackie, Cayley
Wall, Kayla M
Gagnon, Michelle M
author_sort Eskowich, Sadie
collection PubMed
description Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140) were randomly assigned to one of three validation conditions (i.e. sensory, emotional, or neutral) and completed the cold pressor task (CPT). Participants provided self-report ratings of pain and affective-related variables. Subsequently, a researcher validated emotional, sensory, or no aspects of participants’ experience. The CPT was repeated, as were the self-report ratings. No significant differences were observed across conditions in pain or affective outcomes. All conditions reported an increase in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness across CPT trials. These findings suggest validation content may not impact pain outcomes during painful experiences. Future directions to understanding the nuances of validation across interactions and settings are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104924252023-09-10 Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain Eskowich, Sadie Mackie, Cayley Wall, Kayla M Gagnon, Michelle M J Health Psychol Articles Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140) were randomly assigned to one of three validation conditions (i.e. sensory, emotional, or neutral) and completed the cold pressor task (CPT). Participants provided self-report ratings of pain and affective-related variables. Subsequently, a researcher validated emotional, sensory, or no aspects of participants’ experience. The CPT was repeated, as were the self-report ratings. No significant differences were observed across conditions in pain or affective outcomes. All conditions reported an increase in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness across CPT trials. These findings suggest validation content may not impact pain outcomes during painful experiences. Future directions to understanding the nuances of validation across interactions and settings are discussed. SAGE Publications 2023-03-17 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10492425/ /pubmed/36932664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591053231161065 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Eskowich, Sadie
Mackie, Cayley
Wall, Kayla M
Gagnon, Michelle M
Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
title Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
title_full Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
title_fullStr Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
title_full_unstemmed Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
title_short Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
title_sort is all validation equal? evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591053231161065
work_keys_str_mv AT eskowichsadie isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain
AT mackiecayley isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain
AT wallkaylam isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain
AT gagnonmichellem isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain