Cargando…
Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain
Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591053231161065 |
_version_ | 1785104254492475392 |
---|---|
author | Eskowich, Sadie Mackie, Cayley Wall, Kayla M Gagnon, Michelle M |
author_facet | Eskowich, Sadie Mackie, Cayley Wall, Kayla M Gagnon, Michelle M |
author_sort | Eskowich, Sadie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140) were randomly assigned to one of three validation conditions (i.e. sensory, emotional, or neutral) and completed the cold pressor task (CPT). Participants provided self-report ratings of pain and affective-related variables. Subsequently, a researcher validated emotional, sensory, or no aspects of participants’ experience. The CPT was repeated, as were the self-report ratings. No significant differences were observed across conditions in pain or affective outcomes. All conditions reported an increase in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness across CPT trials. These findings suggest validation content may not impact pain outcomes during painful experiences. Future directions to understanding the nuances of validation across interactions and settings are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10492425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104924252023-09-10 Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain Eskowich, Sadie Mackie, Cayley Wall, Kayla M Gagnon, Michelle M J Health Psychol Articles Validation has been examined in experimental and clinical settings, but examination of whether specific content of validation responses affect pain-related outcomes has not been considered. We examined the impact of sensory- or emotion-focused validation following a pain task. Participants (N = 140) were randomly assigned to one of three validation conditions (i.e. sensory, emotional, or neutral) and completed the cold pressor task (CPT). Participants provided self-report ratings of pain and affective-related variables. Subsequently, a researcher validated emotional, sensory, or no aspects of participants’ experience. The CPT was repeated, as were the self-report ratings. No significant differences were observed across conditions in pain or affective outcomes. All conditions reported an increase in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness across CPT trials. These findings suggest validation content may not impact pain outcomes during painful experiences. Future directions to understanding the nuances of validation across interactions and settings are discussed. SAGE Publications 2023-03-17 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10492425/ /pubmed/36932664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591053231161065 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Eskowich, Sadie Mackie, Cayley Wall, Kayla M Gagnon, Michelle M Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
title | Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
title_full | Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
title_fullStr | Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
title_short | Is all validation equal? Evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
title_sort | is all validation equal? evaluating sensory- and emotion-focused validation in the context of experimentally induced pain |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36932664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13591053231161065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eskowichsadie isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain AT mackiecayley isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain AT wallkaylam isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain AT gagnonmichellem isallvalidationequalevaluatingsensoryandemotionfocusedvalidationinthecontextofexperimentallyinducedpain |