Cargando…

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service

Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drury, Amanda, Goss, Julie, Afolabi, Jide, McHugh, Gillian, O’Leary, Norma, Brady, Anne-Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231162402
_version_ 1785104258278883328
author Drury, Amanda
Goss, Julie
Afolabi, Jide
McHugh, Gillian
O’Leary, Norma
Brady, Anne-Marie
author_facet Drury, Amanda
Goss, Julie
Afolabi, Jide
McHugh, Gillian
O’Leary, Norma
Brady, Anne-Marie
author_sort Drury, Amanda
collection PubMed
description Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires (n = 10), medical record audit (n = 14) and a post-discharge interview (n = 8). Caregivers (n = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to (n = 2) and delivery of (n = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104924422023-09-10 A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service Drury, Amanda Goss, Julie Afolabi, Jide McHugh, Gillian O’Leary, Norma Brady, Anne-Marie Eval Rev Original Research Articles Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires (n = 10), medical record audit (n = 14) and a post-discharge interview (n = 8). Caregivers (n = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to (n = 2) and delivery of (n = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes. SAGE Publications 2023-04-04 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10492442/ /pubmed/37014066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231162402 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Drury, Amanda
Goss, Julie
Afolabi, Jide
McHugh, Gillian
O’Leary, Norma
Brady, Anne-Marie
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
title A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
title_full A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
title_fullStr A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
title_short A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary breathlessness support service
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231162402
work_keys_str_mv AT druryamanda amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT gossjulie amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT afolabijide amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT mchughgillian amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT olearynorma amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT bradyannemarie amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT druryamanda mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT gossjulie mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT afolabijide mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT mchughgillian mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT olearynorma mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice
AT bradyannemarie mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice