Cargando…
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service
Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231162402 |
_version_ | 1785104258278883328 |
---|---|
author | Drury, Amanda Goss, Julie Afolabi, Jide McHugh, Gillian O’Leary, Norma Brady, Anne-Marie |
author_facet | Drury, Amanda Goss, Julie Afolabi, Jide McHugh, Gillian O’Leary, Norma Brady, Anne-Marie |
author_sort | Drury, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires (n = 10), medical record audit (n = 14) and a post-discharge interview (n = 8). Caregivers (n = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to (n = 2) and delivery of (n = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10492442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104924422023-09-10 A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service Drury, Amanda Goss, Julie Afolabi, Jide McHugh, Gillian O’Leary, Norma Brady, Anne-Marie Eval Rev Original Research Articles Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires (n = 10), medical record audit (n = 14) and a post-discharge interview (n = 8). Caregivers (n = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to (n = 2) and delivery of (n = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes. SAGE Publications 2023-04-04 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10492442/ /pubmed/37014066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231162402 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Drury, Amanda Goss, Julie Afolabi, Jide McHugh, Gillian O’Leary, Norma Brady, Anne-Marie A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service |
title | A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service |
title_full | A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service |
title_fullStr | A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service |
title_full_unstemmed | A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service |
title_short | A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service |
title_sort | mixed methods evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary breathlessness support service |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231162402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT druryamanda amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT gossjulie amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT afolabijide amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT mchughgillian amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT olearynorma amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT bradyannemarie amixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT druryamanda mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT gossjulie mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT afolabijide mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT mchughgillian mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT olearynorma mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice AT bradyannemarie mixedmethodsevaluationofapilotmultidisciplinarybreathlessnesssupportservice |