Cargando…
Treatment with adalimumab in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in routine care
BACKGROUND: Previous experiences with non-medical switching of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) come mainly from phase III extension of randomised clinical trials and little from routine care. OBJECTIVES: To analyse treatment trajectories over 2 years...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X231197087 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Previous experiences with non-medical switching of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) come mainly from phase III extension of randomised clinical trials and little from routine care. OBJECTIVES: To analyse treatment trajectories over 2 years in patients with CIRD conducting a non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar ADA. DESIGN: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted with data from a third-level rheumatology centre in Germany. CIRD patients on originator ADA who switched to ADA biosimilar from October 2018 onwards were identified and followed until September 2020. METHODS: Patients’ characteristics were compared between the four a priori defined treatment trajectories ‘continued biosimilar ADA therapy’, ‘back-switch to originator ADA therapy’, ‘switch to another biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy’ and ‘stopped bDMARD therapy/death/drop out’. Factors associated with continuing biosimilar ADA therapy were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 121 CIRD patients were included. Most patients (66.9%) continued therapy with biosimilar ADA over 2 years, with a treatment retention rate of 73.1%. Whereas 21 patients (17.4%) switched back to originator ADA, mainly due to adverse events, and 8 patients (6.6%) switched to a different bDMARD, mainly due to lack of effect. The estimated risk of withdrawal was lower for longer prior duration on originator ADA [hazard ratio (HR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69–0.97] and higher for higher C-reactive protein levels at baseline (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00–1.39). Male patients, older patients and those for whom originator ADA was their first bDMARD tended to have a lower risk of withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that three of four patients continue biosimilar ADA over 2 years with lower risks of withdrawal for male sex, older age, longer prior duration on originator ADA and originator ADA as first bDMARD. |
---|