Cargando…

The Diagnostic Accuracy of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Soluble ST2 for Heart Failure in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Comparative Analysis

BACKGROUND: N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are often markedly elevated in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Identifying novel biomarkers is an important step toward effective diagnosis. Interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 (IL1RL1) protein and human/Soluble suppressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Hongzhen, Zhou, Jun, Zhang, Meng, Shen, Chun, Jiang, Zhifan, Zhang, Tao, Gao, Fei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37667469
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940641
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are often markedly elevated in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Identifying novel biomarkers is an important step toward effective diagnosis. Interleukin-1 receptor-like 1 (IL1RL1) protein and human/Soluble suppression of tumorigenesis-2 (sST2) are promising biomarkers for heart failure (HF). This study aimed to assess the trend of NT-proBNP and sST2 in chronic kidney disease and their diagnostic value for HF. MATERIAL/METHODS: This study was carried out on 420 patients who were divided into a no heart failure group (N=182) and a heart failure group (N=238). Spearman correlation analysis was used to test the association of sST2 and NT-proBNP with renal function. The diagnostic value of each biomarker was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves according to 3 different forms: Total group (n=420), non-CKD group (n=217), and CKD group (n=203). RESULTS: A striking correlation between eGFR and NT-proBNP (r=−0.525; P<0.001) seemed to be far stronger than that with sST2 (r=−0.147; P<0.05). The optimum cutoff points for sST2 and NT-proBNP to detect HF were 28.960 ng/mL and 1280 pg/mL, respectively, in total, 28.71 ng/mL and 481 pg/mL, respectively, in non-CKD patients, and 30.55 ng/mL and 3314 pg/mL, respectively, in CKD patients. The combined model of sST2 and NT-proBNP was superior to the model of sST2 or NT-proBNP alone, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic value of sST2 is less affected by decreased renal function. sST2 combined with NT-proBNP may improve the diagnostic accuracy of HF.