Cargando…

Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of young patients receive shoulder replacements. Greater information on outcomes is needed to inform implant choice. The aim of this study was to investigate the survivorship and clinical effectiveness of hemiarthroplasty and anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, A, Lloyd, T, Sabharwal, S, Liddle, AD, Reilly, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732221075037
_version_ 1785104276266156032
author Davies, A
Lloyd, T
Sabharwal, S
Liddle, AD
Reilly, P
author_facet Davies, A
Lloyd, T
Sabharwal, S
Liddle, AD
Reilly, P
author_sort Davies, A
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of young patients receive shoulder replacements. Greater information on outcomes is needed to inform implant choice. The aim of this study was to investigate the survivorship and clinical effectiveness of hemiarthroplasty and anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients younger than 65 years. METHOD: A systematic review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and National Joint Registry reports. The primary outcomes were implant survival and change in perioperative shoulder scores. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of implant survivorship was performed of six studies reporting on 416 patients. Implant survival was 86.1% (72.1,100) at 10 years for hemiarthroplasty and 82.3% (64.6,100) for TSA. 20 year survival was 80.0% for hemiarthroplasty (72.5,87.4) and 75.0% (56.9,93.1) for TSA. Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis of shoulder scores, multiple instruments were used. The standardised mean difference between pre-operative and post-operative shoulder scores was 2.15 (1.95, 2.35) for TSA at 4.2–4.9 years, and 2.72 (1.98,3.47) for hemiarthroplasty at 3.8–6 years. CONCLUSION: Over 80% of shoulder replacements last more than 10 years, and 75% last more than 20 years. Significant improvements in shoulder scores are shown at all time points.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104925282023-09-10 Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Davies, A Lloyd, T Sabharwal, S Liddle, AD Reilly, P Shoulder Elbow Shoulder INTRODUCTION: Increasing numbers of young patients receive shoulder replacements. Greater information on outcomes is needed to inform implant choice. The aim of this study was to investigate the survivorship and clinical effectiveness of hemiarthroplasty and anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in patients younger than 65 years. METHOD: A systematic review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and National Joint Registry reports. The primary outcomes were implant survival and change in perioperative shoulder scores. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of implant survivorship was performed of six studies reporting on 416 patients. Implant survival was 86.1% (72.1,100) at 10 years for hemiarthroplasty and 82.3% (64.6,100) for TSA. 20 year survival was 80.0% for hemiarthroplasty (72.5,87.4) and 75.0% (56.9,93.1) for TSA. Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis of shoulder scores, multiple instruments were used. The standardised mean difference between pre-operative and post-operative shoulder scores was 2.15 (1.95, 2.35) for TSA at 4.2–4.9 years, and 2.72 (1.98,3.47) for hemiarthroplasty at 3.8–6 years. CONCLUSION: Over 80% of shoulder replacements last more than 10 years, and 75% last more than 20 years. Significant improvements in shoulder scores are shown at all time points. SAGE Publications 2022-02-03 2023-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10492528/ /pubmed/37692879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732221075037 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Davies, A
Lloyd, T
Sabharwal, S
Liddle, AD
Reilly, P
Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort anatomical shoulder replacements in young patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37692879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17585732221075037
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesa anatomicalshoulderreplacementsinyoungpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lloydt anatomicalshoulderreplacementsinyoungpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sabharwals anatomicalshoulderreplacementsinyoungpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liddlead anatomicalshoulderreplacementsinyoungpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reillyp anatomicalshoulderreplacementsinyoungpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis