Cargando…

The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almasi, Afshin, Jafari, Samira, Solouki, Leila, Darvishi, Niloofar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694261
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22
_version_ 1785104297888841728
author Almasi, Afshin
Jafari, Samira
Solouki, Leila
Darvishi, Niloofar
author_facet Almasi, Afshin
Jafari, Samira
Solouki, Leila
Darvishi, Niloofar
author_sort Almasi, Afshin
collection PubMed
description A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20(th), 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I(2) using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of − 8.60 [CI 95% (− 12.75, − 4.45)], − 1.10 [CI 95% (− 5.22, 3.02)], and − 1.00 [CI 95% (− 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104926242023-09-10 The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Almasi, Afshin Jafari, Samira Solouki, Leila Darvishi, Niloofar Adv Biomed Res Review Article A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20(th), 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I(2) using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of − 8.60 [CI 95% (− 12.75, − 4.45)], − 1.10 [CI 95% (− 5.22, 3.02)], and − 1.00 [CI 95% (− 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10492624/ /pubmed/37694261 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Almasi, Afshin
Jafari, Samira
Solouki, Leila
Darvishi, Niloofar
The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort best surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694261
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22
work_keys_str_mv AT almasiafshin thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jafarisamira thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT soloukileila thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT darvishiniloofar thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT almasiafshin bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jafarisamira bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT soloukileila bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT darvishiniloofar bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis