Cargando…
The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international dat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694261 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22 |
_version_ | 1785104297888841728 |
---|---|
author | Almasi, Afshin Jafari, Samira Solouki, Leila Darvishi, Niloofar |
author_facet | Almasi, Afshin Jafari, Samira Solouki, Leila Darvishi, Niloofar |
author_sort | Almasi, Afshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20(th), 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I(2) using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of − 8.60 [CI 95% (− 12.75, − 4.45)], − 1.10 [CI 95% (− 5.22, 3.02)], and − 1.00 [CI 95% (− 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10492624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104926242023-09-10 The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Almasi, Afshin Jafari, Samira Solouki, Leila Darvishi, Niloofar Adv Biomed Res Review Article A case with an inflamed or damaged nerve root in the cervical spine is defined as cervical radiculopathy.The purpose of the current study is to recognize the most effective surgical procedures in cervical radiculopathy subjects. All related studies were taken using PubMed searching international databases, Scopus, ISI Web of Science (WoS), and Science direct with no limit of until November 20(th), 2021. Finally, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, after reviewing all randomized controlled trial studies which had the related data the researchers were looking for, they conducted meta-analysis with the seven remaining studies including eight different treatments. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Cochran's Q and Higgins I(2) using R software for the network. In the results presented in this study, the neck disability index (NDI) changes as a result of taking cervical anterior discectomy without (ACD) and with fusion (ACDF) and ACD arthroplasty were -0.003, -1.659, and -1.656, respectively. According to the final diagram of the network, 11 comparisons were made in pairs. When each treatment group is compared with ACDF, it is shown that there was a significant mean effect among the patients who receive Mobi-C, Kineflx|C, and ADR, with mean differences of − 8.60 [CI 95% (− 12.75, − 4.45)], − 1.10 [CI 95% (− 5.22, 3.02)], and − 1.00 [CI 95% (− 7.18, 5.18)], respectively. The most effective surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy were Mobi-c, Kineflx|C, and artificial disc replacement compared to ACDF treatment, respectively. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10492624/ /pubmed/37694261 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Advanced Biomedical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Almasi, Afshin Jafari, Samira Solouki, Leila Darvishi, Niloofar The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title | The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | best surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37694261 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_251_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almasiafshin thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jafarisamira thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT soloukileila thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT darvishiniloofar thebestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT almasiafshin bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jafarisamira bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT soloukileila bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT darvishiniloofar bestsurgicaltreatmentforcervicalradiculopathyasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |