Cargando…

Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival

Previous work demonstrated inactivation of influenza virus by GHz frequency electromagnetic fields. Despite theoretical and experimental results, the underlying mechanism driving this inactivation remains unknown. One hypothesis is that the electromagnetic field is causing damage to the virion membr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cantu, Jody C., Barnes, Ronald A., Gamboa, Bryan M., Keister, Allen S., Echchgadda, Ibtissam, Ibey, Bennett L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37689615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-023-01601-3
_version_ 1785104327871823872
author Cantu, Jody C.
Barnes, Ronald A.
Gamboa, Bryan M.
Keister, Allen S.
Echchgadda, Ibtissam
Ibey, Bennett L.
author_facet Cantu, Jody C.
Barnes, Ronald A.
Gamboa, Bryan M.
Keister, Allen S.
Echchgadda, Ibtissam
Ibey, Bennett L.
author_sort Cantu, Jody C.
collection PubMed
description Previous work demonstrated inactivation of influenza virus by GHz frequency electromagnetic fields. Despite theoretical and experimental results, the underlying mechanism driving this inactivation remains unknown. One hypothesis is that the electromagnetic field is causing damage to the virion membrane (and therefore changing spike protein orientation) rendering the virus unable to attach and infect host cells. Towards examining this hypothesis, our group employed nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) as a surrogate to radiofrequency (RF) exposure to enable exploration of dose response thresholds of electric field-induced viral membrane damage. In summary, Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) was exposed, in suspension, to mono and bipolar 600-ns pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) at two amplitudes (12.5 and 25 kV/cm) and pulse numbers [0 (sham), 1, 5, 10, 100, and 1000] at a 1 Hz (Hz) repetition rate. The temperature rise immediately after exposure(s) was measured using thermocouples to differentiate effects of the electric field (E-field) and heating (i.e., the thermal gradient). Inactivation of BCoV was evaluated by infecting HRT-18G host cells and assessing differences in virus infectivity days after exposure. Our results show that 600 nsPEFs, both bipolar and monopolar, can reduce the infectivity of coronaviruses at various amplitudes, pulse numbers, and pulse polarity. Interestingly, we observed that bipolar exposures appeared to be more efficient at lower exposure intensities than monopolar pulses. Future work should focus on experiments to identify the mechanism underlying nsPEF-induced viral inactivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104927712023-09-11 Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival Cantu, Jody C. Barnes, Ronald A. Gamboa, Bryan M. Keister, Allen S. Echchgadda, Ibtissam Ibey, Bennett L. AMB Express Original Article Previous work demonstrated inactivation of influenza virus by GHz frequency electromagnetic fields. Despite theoretical and experimental results, the underlying mechanism driving this inactivation remains unknown. One hypothesis is that the electromagnetic field is causing damage to the virion membrane (and therefore changing spike protein orientation) rendering the virus unable to attach and infect host cells. Towards examining this hypothesis, our group employed nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) as a surrogate to radiofrequency (RF) exposure to enable exploration of dose response thresholds of electric field-induced viral membrane damage. In summary, Bovine coronavirus (BCoV) was exposed, in suspension, to mono and bipolar 600-ns pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) at two amplitudes (12.5 and 25 kV/cm) and pulse numbers [0 (sham), 1, 5, 10, 100, and 1000] at a 1 Hz (Hz) repetition rate. The temperature rise immediately after exposure(s) was measured using thermocouples to differentiate effects of the electric field (E-field) and heating (i.e., the thermal gradient). Inactivation of BCoV was evaluated by infecting HRT-18G host cells and assessing differences in virus infectivity days after exposure. Our results show that 600 nsPEFs, both bipolar and monopolar, can reduce the infectivity of coronaviruses at various amplitudes, pulse numbers, and pulse polarity. Interestingly, we observed that bipolar exposures appeared to be more efficient at lower exposure intensities than monopolar pulses. Future work should focus on experiments to identify the mechanism underlying nsPEF-induced viral inactivation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10492771/ /pubmed/37689615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-023-01601-3 Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Cantu, Jody C.
Barnes, Ronald A.
Gamboa, Bryan M.
Keister, Allen S.
Echchgadda, Ibtissam
Ibey, Bennett L.
Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival
title Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival
title_full Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival
title_fullStr Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival
title_full_unstemmed Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival
title_short Effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs) on coronavirus survival
title_sort effect of nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nspefs) on coronavirus survival
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37689615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13568-023-01601-3
work_keys_str_mv AT cantujodyc effectofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldsnspefsoncoronavirussurvival
AT barnesronalda effectofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldsnspefsoncoronavirussurvival
AT gamboabryanm effectofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldsnspefsoncoronavirussurvival
AT keisterallens effectofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldsnspefsoncoronavirussurvival
AT echchgaddaibtissam effectofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldsnspefsoncoronavirussurvival
AT ibeybennettl effectofnanosecondpulsedelectricfieldsnspefsoncoronavirussurvival