Cargando…

Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) is based on 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which recommend the preferential use of prasugrel over ticagrelor. Because the selection of the respective P(2)Y(12) inhibitor has to consid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yildirim, Mustafa, Mueller‐Hennessen, Matthias, Milles, Barbara Ruth, Biener, Moritz, Hund, Hauke, Frey, Norbert, Giannitsis, Evangelos, Salbach, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37581388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030879
_version_ 1785104364322422784
author Yildirim, Mustafa
Mueller‐Hennessen, Matthias
Milles, Barbara Ruth
Biener, Moritz
Hund, Hauke
Frey, Norbert
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Salbach, Christian
author_facet Yildirim, Mustafa
Mueller‐Hennessen, Matthias
Milles, Barbara Ruth
Biener, Moritz
Hund, Hauke
Frey, Norbert
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Salbach, Christian
author_sort Yildirim, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) is based on 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which recommend the preferential use of prasugrel over ticagrelor. Because the selection of the respective P(2)Y(12) inhibitor has to consider label restrictions, we sought to evaluate the proportion of patients qualifying for either ticagrelor or prasugrel and reasons for noneligibility in an unselected cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective observational study, patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTE‐ACS presenting consecutively during a 24‐month period were enrolled. The eligibility of patients for a dual antiplatelet therapy option was assessed retrospectively. A total of 1502 patients had confirmed acute coronary syndrome (287 STEMI and 1215 NSTE‐ACS). Eligibility for ticagrelor and full‐dose prasugrel differed significantly for STEMI and NSTE‐ACS (93% versus 51%, P<0.0001 versus 80% versus 31%, P<0.0001). Eligibility remained significantly lower (STEMI 78% versus NSTE‐ACS 52%) if low‐dose prasugrel was considered. Patients eligible for full‐dose prasugrel had lower ischemic risk per GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score (109 points [90–129 points] versus 121 points [98–146 points], P<0.0001) and lower bleeding risk (14 points [13–15 points] versus 20 points [12–29 points], P<0.0001) per PRECISE‐DAPT (Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) score. CONCLUSIONS: In real life, eligibility for prasugrel in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy is considerably lower than for ticagrelor, even in a cohort with high rates of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. The recommended use of prasugrel over ticagrelor in current acute coronary syndrome guidelines contrasts with our observations of a substantial disparity on the eligibility. This important aspect has not received appropriate attention yet. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05774431.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10492934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104929342023-09-11 Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Yildirim, Mustafa Mueller‐Hennessen, Matthias Milles, Barbara Ruth Biener, Moritz Hund, Hauke Frey, Norbert Giannitsis, Evangelos Salbach, Christian J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Management of patients with non–ST‐segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) is based on 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which recommend the preferential use of prasugrel over ticagrelor. Because the selection of the respective P(2)Y(12) inhibitor has to consider label restrictions, we sought to evaluate the proportion of patients qualifying for either ticagrelor or prasugrel and reasons for noneligibility in an unselected cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective observational study, patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTE‐ACS presenting consecutively during a 24‐month period were enrolled. The eligibility of patients for a dual antiplatelet therapy option was assessed retrospectively. A total of 1502 patients had confirmed acute coronary syndrome (287 STEMI and 1215 NSTE‐ACS). Eligibility for ticagrelor and full‐dose prasugrel differed significantly for STEMI and NSTE‐ACS (93% versus 51%, P<0.0001 versus 80% versus 31%, P<0.0001). Eligibility remained significantly lower (STEMI 78% versus NSTE‐ACS 52%) if low‐dose prasugrel was considered. Patients eligible for full‐dose prasugrel had lower ischemic risk per GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score (109 points [90–129 points] versus 121 points [98–146 points], P<0.0001) and lower bleeding risk (14 points [13–15 points] versus 20 points [12–29 points], P<0.0001) per PRECISE‐DAPT (Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) score. CONCLUSIONS: In real life, eligibility for prasugrel in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy is considerably lower than for ticagrelor, even in a cohort with high rates of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. The recommended use of prasugrel over ticagrelor in current acute coronary syndrome guidelines contrasts with our observations of a substantial disparity on the eligibility. This important aspect has not received appropriate attention yet. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05774431. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10492934/ /pubmed/37581388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030879 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yildirim, Mustafa
Mueller‐Hennessen, Matthias
Milles, Barbara Ruth
Biener, Moritz
Hund, Hauke
Frey, Norbert
Giannitsis, Evangelos
Salbach, Christian
Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_fullStr Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_short Real‐World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
title_sort real‐world evidence on disparities on the initiation of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10492934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37581388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.030879
work_keys_str_mv AT yildirimmustafa realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT muellerhennessenmatthias realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT millesbarbararuth realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT bienermoritz realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT hundhauke realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT freynorbert realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT giannitsisevangelos realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome
AT salbachchristian realworldevidenceondisparitiesontheinitiationofticagrelorversusprasugrelinpatientswithacutecoronarysyndrome