Cargando…
The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
AIM: Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701537 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S420109 |
_version_ | 1785104404953694208 |
---|---|
author | Balgazarov, Serik Belokobylov, Alexey Batpen, Arman Ramazanov, Zhanatai Dolgov, Alexey Rimashevskiy, Denis Kriklivyy, Alexandr |
author_facet | Balgazarov, Serik Belokobylov, Alexey Batpen, Arman Ramazanov, Zhanatai Dolgov, Alexey Rimashevskiy, Denis Kriklivyy, Alexandr |
author_sort | Balgazarov, Serik |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular surface due to multiple reasons: risk of thermal bone damage, inadequate cement pressurization and bone cement shrinkage, etc. Staged cementing for preventing bone heating and over negative effects of cementing on a thick layer of bone cement has limited support in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of 4.5 years follow up after temporary-permanent spacer implantation in a 63-year-old male with chronic deep knee PJI and tibial AORI type 3 bone defect reconstructed via double cementing method. RESULTS: Method of double (staged) cementing used for reconstruction of epiphyseal tibial bone defect in a patient with fistula form of knee PJI shows excellent clinical results at 4.5 years follow up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10493111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104931112023-09-11 The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report Balgazarov, Serik Belokobylov, Alexey Batpen, Arman Ramazanov, Zhanatai Dolgov, Alexey Rimashevskiy, Denis Kriklivyy, Alexandr Int Med Case Rep J Case Report AIM: Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular surface due to multiple reasons: risk of thermal bone damage, inadequate cement pressurization and bone cement shrinkage, etc. Staged cementing for preventing bone heating and over negative effects of cementing on a thick layer of bone cement has limited support in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of 4.5 years follow up after temporary-permanent spacer implantation in a 63-year-old male with chronic deep knee PJI and tibial AORI type 3 bone defect reconstructed via double cementing method. RESULTS: Method of double (staged) cementing used for reconstruction of epiphyseal tibial bone defect in a patient with fistula form of knee PJI shows excellent clinical results at 4.5 years follow up. Dove 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10493111/ /pubmed/37701537 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S420109 Text en © 2023 Balgazarov et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Balgazarov, Serik Belokobylov, Alexey Batpen, Arman Ramazanov, Zhanatai Dolgov, Alexey Rimashevskiy, Denis Kriklivyy, Alexandr The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report |
title | The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report |
title_full | The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report |
title_fullStr | The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report |
title_full_unstemmed | The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report |
title_short | The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report |
title_sort | first stage of knee revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic infection with replacement of a large defect double cementing method: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701537 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S420109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balgazarovserik thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT belokobylovalexey thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT batpenarman thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT ramazanovzhanatai thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT dolgovalexey thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT rimashevskiydenis thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT kriklivyyalexandr thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT balgazarovserik firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT belokobylovalexey firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT batpenarman firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT ramazanovzhanatai firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT dolgovalexey firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT rimashevskiydenis firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport AT kriklivyyalexandr firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport |