Cargando…

The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report

AIM: Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balgazarov, Serik, Belokobylov, Alexey, Batpen, Arman, Ramazanov, Zhanatai, Dolgov, Alexey, Rimashevskiy, Denis, Kriklivyy, Alexandr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701537
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S420109
_version_ 1785104404953694208
author Balgazarov, Serik
Belokobylov, Alexey
Batpen, Arman
Ramazanov, Zhanatai
Dolgov, Alexey
Rimashevskiy, Denis
Kriklivyy, Alexandr
author_facet Balgazarov, Serik
Belokobylov, Alexey
Batpen, Arman
Ramazanov, Zhanatai
Dolgov, Alexey
Rimashevskiy, Denis
Kriklivyy, Alexandr
author_sort Balgazarov, Serik
collection PubMed
description AIM: Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular surface due to multiple reasons: risk of thermal bone damage, inadequate cement pressurization and bone cement shrinkage, etc. Staged cementing for preventing bone heating and over negative effects of cementing on a thick layer of bone cement has limited support in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of 4.5 years follow up after temporary-permanent spacer implantation in a 63-year-old male with chronic deep knee PJI and tibial AORI type 3 bone defect reconstructed via double cementing method. RESULTS: Method of double (staged) cementing used for reconstruction of epiphyseal tibial bone defect in a patient with fistula form of knee PJI shows excellent clinical results at 4.5 years follow up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10493111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104931112023-09-11 The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report Balgazarov, Serik Belokobylov, Alexey Batpen, Arman Ramazanov, Zhanatai Dolgov, Alexey Rimashevskiy, Denis Kriklivyy, Alexandr Int Med Case Rep J Case Report AIM: Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular surface due to multiple reasons: risk of thermal bone damage, inadequate cement pressurization and bone cement shrinkage, etc. Staged cementing for preventing bone heating and over negative effects of cementing on a thick layer of bone cement has limited support in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of 4.5 years follow up after temporary-permanent spacer implantation in a 63-year-old male with chronic deep knee PJI and tibial AORI type 3 bone defect reconstructed via double cementing method. RESULTS: Method of double (staged) cementing used for reconstruction of epiphyseal tibial bone defect in a patient with fistula form of knee PJI shows excellent clinical results at 4.5 years follow up. Dove 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10493111/ /pubmed/37701537 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S420109 Text en © 2023 Balgazarov et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Case Report
Balgazarov, Serik
Belokobylov, Alexey
Batpen, Arman
Ramazanov, Zhanatai
Dolgov, Alexey
Rimashevskiy, Denis
Kriklivyy, Alexandr
The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
title The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
title_full The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
title_fullStr The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
title_full_unstemmed The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
title_short The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report
title_sort first stage of knee revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic infection with replacement of a large defect double cementing method: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701537
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S420109
work_keys_str_mv AT balgazarovserik thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT belokobylovalexey thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT batpenarman thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT ramazanovzhanatai thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT dolgovalexey thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT rimashevskiydenis thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT kriklivyyalexandr thefirststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT balgazarovserik firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT belokobylovalexey firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT batpenarman firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT ramazanovzhanatai firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT dolgovalexey firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT rimashevskiydenis firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport
AT kriklivyyalexandr firststageofkneerevisionarthroplastyinperiprostheticinfectionwithreplacementofalargedefectdoublecementingmethodacasereport