Cargando…

Model-driven survival prediction after congenital heart surgery

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to improve postoperative risk assessment in congenital heart surgery by developing a machine-learning model based on readily available peri- and postoperative parameters. METHODS: Our bicentric retrospective data analysis from January 2014 to December 2019...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zürn, Christoph, Hübner, David, Ziesenitz, Victoria C, Höhn, René, Schuler, Lena, Schlange, Tim, Gorenflo, Matthias, Kari, Fabian A, Kroll, Johannes, Loukanov, Tsvetomir, Klemm, Rolf, Stiller, Brigitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37279735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivad089
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to improve postoperative risk assessment in congenital heart surgery by developing a machine-learning model based on readily available peri- and postoperative parameters. METHODS: Our bicentric retrospective data analysis from January 2014 to December 2019 of established risk parameters for dismal outcome was used to train and test a model to predict postoperative survival within the first 30 days. The Freiburg training data consisted of 780 procedures; the Heidelberg test data comprised 985 procedures. STAT mortality score, age, aortic cross-clamp time and postoperative lactate values over 24 h were considered. RESULTS: Our model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 94.86%, specificity of 89.48% and sensitivity of 85.00%, resulting in 3 false negatives and 99 false positives. The STAT mortality score and the aortic cross-clamp time each showed a statistically highly significant impact on postoperative mortality. Interestingly, a child’s age was barely statistically significant. Postoperative lactate values indicated an increased mortality risk if they were either constantly at a high level or low during the first 8 h postoperatively with an increase afterwards. When considering parameters available before, at the end of and 24 h after surgery, the predictive power of the complete model achieved the highest AUC. This, compared to the already high predictive power alone (AUC 88.9%) of the STAT mortality score, translates to an error reduction of 53.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our model predicts postoperative survival after congenital heart surgery with great accuracy. Compared with preoperative risk assessments, our postoperative risk assessment reduces prediction error by half. Heightened awareness of high-risk patients should improve preventive measures and thus patient safety.