Cargando…

Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery

AIMS: Machine learning‐based identification of key variables and prediction of postoperative delirium in patients with extensive burns. METHODS: Five hundred and eighteen patients with extensive burns who underwent surgery were included and randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ren, Yujie, Zhang, Yu, Zhan, Jianhua, Sun, Junfeng, Luo, Jinhua, Liao, Wenqiang, Cheng, Xing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.14237
_version_ 1785104525080657920
author Ren, Yujie
Zhang, Yu
Zhan, Jianhua
Sun, Junfeng
Luo, Jinhua
Liao, Wenqiang
Cheng, Xing
author_facet Ren, Yujie
Zhang, Yu
Zhan, Jianhua
Sun, Junfeng
Luo, Jinhua
Liao, Wenqiang
Cheng, Xing
author_sort Ren, Yujie
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Machine learning‐based identification of key variables and prediction of postoperative delirium in patients with extensive burns. METHODS: Five hundred and eighteen patients with extensive burns who underwent surgery were included and randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to screen for significant variables. Nine prediction models were constructed in the training and validation sets (80% of dataset). The testing set (20% of dataset) was used to further evaluate the model. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to compare model performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the best one and to externally validate it in another large tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Seven variables were used in the development of nine prediction models: physical restraint, diabetes, sex, preoperative hemoglobin, acute physiological and chronic health assessment, time in the Burn Intensive Care Unit and total body surface area. Random Forest (RF) outperformed the other eight models in terms of predictive performance (ROC:84.00%) When external validation was performed, RF performed well (accuracy: 77.12%, sensitivity: 67.74% and specificity: 80.46%). CONCLUSION: The first machine learning‐based delirium prediction model for patients with extensive burns was successfully developed and validated. High‐risk patients for delirium can be effectively identified and targeted interventions can be made to reduce the incidence of delirium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10493655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104936552023-09-12 Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery Ren, Yujie Zhang, Yu Zhan, Jianhua Sun, Junfeng Luo, Jinhua Liao, Wenqiang Cheng, Xing CNS Neurosci Ther Original Articles AIMS: Machine learning‐based identification of key variables and prediction of postoperative delirium in patients with extensive burns. METHODS: Five hundred and eighteen patients with extensive burns who underwent surgery were included and randomly divided into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to screen for significant variables. Nine prediction models were constructed in the training and validation sets (80% of dataset). The testing set (20% of dataset) was used to further evaluate the model. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to compare model performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the best one and to externally validate it in another large tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Seven variables were used in the development of nine prediction models: physical restraint, diabetes, sex, preoperative hemoglobin, acute physiological and chronic health assessment, time in the Burn Intensive Care Unit and total body surface area. Random Forest (RF) outperformed the other eight models in terms of predictive performance (ROC:84.00%) When external validation was performed, RF performed well (accuracy: 77.12%, sensitivity: 67.74% and specificity: 80.46%). CONCLUSION: The first machine learning‐based delirium prediction model for patients with extensive burns was successfully developed and validated. High‐risk patients for delirium can be effectively identified and targeted interventions can be made to reduce the incidence of delirium. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10493655/ /pubmed/37122154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.14237 Text en © 2023 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ren, Yujie
Zhang, Yu
Zhan, Jianhua
Sun, Junfeng
Luo, Jinhua
Liao, Wenqiang
Cheng, Xing
Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
title Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
title_full Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
title_fullStr Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
title_short Machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
title_sort machine learning for prediction of delirium in patients with extensive burns after surgery
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37122154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.14237
work_keys_str_mv AT renyujie machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery
AT zhangyu machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery
AT zhanjianhua machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery
AT sunjunfeng machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery
AT luojinhua machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery
AT liaowenqiang machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery
AT chengxing machinelearningforpredictionofdeliriuminpatientswithextensiveburnsaftersurgery