Cargando…
Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study
AIMS: Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the Sp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2023-0049 |
_version_ | 1785104568276746240 |
---|---|
author | Beresford-Cleary, Nicolas J. A. Silman, Alan Thakar, Chrishan Gardner, Adrian Harding, Ian Cooper, Cushla Cook, Jonathan Rothenfluh, Dominique A. |
author_facet | Beresford-Cleary, Nicolas J. A. Silman, Alan Thakar, Chrishan Gardner, Adrian Harding, Ian Cooper, Cushla Cook, Jonathan Rothenfluh, Dominique A. |
author_sort | Beresford-Cleary, Nicolas J. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted. METHODS: As part of the SpInOuT-F study, a pilot randomized trial was carried out across five NHS hospitals. Patients were randomized to either spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline and three months. The intended sample size was 60 patients. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients screened, 77 passed the initial screening criteria. A total of 27 patients had a PI-LL mismatch and 23 had a dynamic spondylolisthesis. Following secondary inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 patients were eligible for the study. Six patients were randomized and one underwent surgery during the study period. Given the low number of patients recruited and randomized, it was not possible to assess completion rates, quality of life, imaging, or health economic outcomes as intended. CONCLUSION: This study provides a unique insight into the prevalence of dynamic spondylolisthesis and PI-LL mismatch in patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis, and demonstrates that there is a need for a definitive RCT which stratifies for these groups in order to inform surgical decision-making. Nonetheless a definitive study would need further refinement in design and implementation in order to be feasible. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):573–579. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10493898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104938982023-09-12 Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study Beresford-Cleary, Nicolas J. A. Silman, Alan Thakar, Chrishan Gardner, Adrian Harding, Ian Cooper, Cushla Cook, Jonathan Rothenfluh, Dominique A. Bone Jt Open Spine AIMS: Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted. METHODS: As part of the SpInOuT-F study, a pilot randomized trial was carried out across five NHS hospitals. Patients were randomized to either spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline and three months. The intended sample size was 60 patients. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients screened, 77 passed the initial screening criteria. A total of 27 patients had a PI-LL mismatch and 23 had a dynamic spondylolisthesis. Following secondary inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 patients were eligible for the study. Six patients were randomized and one underwent surgery during the study period. Given the low number of patients recruited and randomized, it was not possible to assess completion rates, quality of life, imaging, or health economic outcomes as intended. CONCLUSION: This study provides a unique insight into the prevalence of dynamic spondylolisthesis and PI-LL mismatch in patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis, and demonstrates that there is a need for a definitive RCT which stratifies for these groups in order to inform surgical decision-making. Nonetheless a definitive study would need further refinement in design and implementation in order to be feasible. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):573–579. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10493898/ /pubmed/37549931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2023-0049 Text en © 2023 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDMThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Spine Beresford-Cleary, Nicolas J. A. Silman, Alan Thakar, Chrishan Gardner, Adrian Harding, Ian Cooper, Cushla Cook, Jonathan Rothenfluh, Dominique A. Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study |
title | Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study |
title_full | Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study |
title_short | Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the Spinal Fusion Indications and Outcomes Randomised Trial (SpInOuT-F) feasibility study |
title_sort | findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion: the spinal fusion indications and outcomes randomised trial (spinout-f) feasibility study |
topic | Spine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10493898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2023-0049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beresfordclearynicolasja findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT silmanalan findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT thakarchrishan findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT gardneradrian findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT hardingian findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT coopercushla findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT cookjonathan findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy AT rothenfluhdominiquea findingsfromapilotrandomizedtrialofspinaldecompressionaloneorspinaldecompressionplusinstrumentedfusionthespinalfusionindicationsandoutcomesrandomisedtrialspinoutffeasibilitystudy |