Cargando…

S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention

PURPOSE: Improving children’s motor competence through school-based physical activity interventions may be a mechanism for promoting positive mental health through psychosocial factors. Move Well, Feel Good (MWFG) is a such an intervention that was co-designed with children, class teachers, physical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fairclough, Stuart J, Clifford, Lauren, Foweather, Lawrence, Knowles, Zoe, Boddy, Lynne M, Ashworth, Emma, Tyler, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494006/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.061
_version_ 1785104594432425984
author Fairclough, Stuart J
Clifford, Lauren
Foweather, Lawrence
Knowles, Zoe
Boddy, Lynne M
Ashworth, Emma
Tyler, Richard
author_facet Fairclough, Stuart J
Clifford, Lauren
Foweather, Lawrence
Knowles, Zoe
Boddy, Lynne M
Ashworth, Emma
Tyler, Richard
author_sort Fairclough, Stuart J
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Improving children’s motor competence through school-based physical activity interventions may be a mechanism for promoting positive mental health through psychosocial factors. Move Well, Feel Good (MWFG) is a such an intervention that was co-designed with children, class teachers, physical education (PE) teachers, and school leaders. This presentation describes the feasibility evaluation of MWFG. METHODS: Five primary schools were recruited from a low socioeconomic status community in northwest England. A 10-week intervention was co-designed which aimed to enhance children’s mental health through motor competence and psychosocial development. The core delivery of the programme involved one PE lesson per week devoted to development of locomotor, object control, and stability skills. This was supplemented by optional recess and home activities, and by non-PE curricular activities. Teachers were asked to record details of each MWFG session taught, and feasibility was evaluated against pre-defined criteria using surveys, interviews (teachers), and participatory focus groups (children). Pre- and post-intervention assessments of motor competence, mental health, wellbeing, psychosocial factors, and 24-hour movement behaviours were also completed. RESULTS: The 5 schools represented 83% of the target number of schools and 108 children consented (43% of target). PE and class teachers were recruited in all schools (100% of target). Intervention dose was reflected by 76% of scheduled PE lessons being delivered. Adherence was strong with >85% of children attending ≥75% of lessons. Positive indicators of acceptability were provided by 86% of children, 83% of PE teachers, and 90% of class teachers. Teachers commented on the children’s positive engagement irrespective of ability, the quality of resources provided, and the challenges of competing demands for curriculum time and spaces to deliver MWFG. The data collection methods were deemed acceptable by 91% of children and 80% of class teachers, and children spoke positively about participating in the data collection. Secondary outcome data collection was completed by 87%-100% of children, with a 0%-6% attrition rate at post-intervention. Descriptive analysis revealed favourable changes in motor competence and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: MWFG was deemed to be feasible to develop further into a pilot trial, with improved school and child recruitment strategies warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10494006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104940062023-09-12 S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention Fairclough, Stuart J Clifford, Lauren Foweather, Lawrence Knowles, Zoe Boddy, Lynne M Ashworth, Emma Tyler, Richard Eur J Public Health Symposia PURPOSE: Improving children’s motor competence through school-based physical activity interventions may be a mechanism for promoting positive mental health through psychosocial factors. Move Well, Feel Good (MWFG) is a such an intervention that was co-designed with children, class teachers, physical education (PE) teachers, and school leaders. This presentation describes the feasibility evaluation of MWFG. METHODS: Five primary schools were recruited from a low socioeconomic status community in northwest England. A 10-week intervention was co-designed which aimed to enhance children’s mental health through motor competence and psychosocial development. The core delivery of the programme involved one PE lesson per week devoted to development of locomotor, object control, and stability skills. This was supplemented by optional recess and home activities, and by non-PE curricular activities. Teachers were asked to record details of each MWFG session taught, and feasibility was evaluated against pre-defined criteria using surveys, interviews (teachers), and participatory focus groups (children). Pre- and post-intervention assessments of motor competence, mental health, wellbeing, psychosocial factors, and 24-hour movement behaviours were also completed. RESULTS: The 5 schools represented 83% of the target number of schools and 108 children consented (43% of target). PE and class teachers were recruited in all schools (100% of target). Intervention dose was reflected by 76% of scheduled PE lessons being delivered. Adherence was strong with >85% of children attending ≥75% of lessons. Positive indicators of acceptability were provided by 86% of children, 83% of PE teachers, and 90% of class teachers. Teachers commented on the children’s positive engagement irrespective of ability, the quality of resources provided, and the challenges of competing demands for curriculum time and spaces to deliver MWFG. The data collection methods were deemed acceptable by 91% of children and 80% of class teachers, and children spoke positively about participating in the data collection. Secondary outcome data collection was completed by 87%-100% of children, with a 0%-6% attrition rate at post-intervention. Descriptive analysis revealed favourable changes in motor competence and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: MWFG was deemed to be feasible to develop further into a pilot trial, with improved school and child recruitment strategies warranted. Oxford University Press 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494006/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.061 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Symposia
Fairclough, Stuart J
Clifford, Lauren
Foweather, Lawrence
Knowles, Zoe
Boddy, Lynne M
Ashworth, Emma
Tyler, Richard
S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention
title S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention
title_full S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention
title_fullStr S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention
title_full_unstemmed S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention
title_short S12-4 Feasibility evaluation of the Move Well, Feel Good movement behaviours intervention
title_sort s12-4 feasibility evaluation of the move well, feel good movement behaviours intervention
topic Symposia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494006/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.061
work_keys_str_mv AT faircloughstuartj s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention
AT cliffordlauren s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention
AT foweatherlawrence s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention
AT knowleszoe s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention
AT boddylynnem s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention
AT ashworthemma s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention
AT tylerrichard s124feasibilityevaluationofthemovewellfeelgoodmovementbehavioursintervention