Cargando…
O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
PURPOSE: While health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) initiatives can improve mental health, there is a lack of standardised measures to evaluate mental health outcomes. The need for the current work emerged from discussions amongst researcher and practitioner members of the HEPA promotion in soc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494023/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.079 |
_version_ | 1785104598635118592 |
---|---|
author | Aisling, McGrath Murphy, Niamh Evan, Matthews Annemarie, Wagemakers Mark, Tully Kirsten, Verkooijen |
author_facet | Aisling, McGrath Murphy, Niamh Evan, Matthews Annemarie, Wagemakers Mark, Tully Kirsten, Verkooijen |
author_sort | Aisling, McGrath |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: While health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) initiatives can improve mental health, there is a lack of standardised measures to evaluate mental health outcomes. The need for the current work emerged from discussions amongst researcher and practitioner members of the HEPA promotion in socially disadvantaged groups Working Group of the HEPA Europe network. This study aimed to identify the most relevant indicators of mental health and well-being in community-based HEPA initiatives in Europe, and determine optimal assessment methods. METHODS: An adapted, two round, Delphi method (guided by an indicator framework to categorise mental health indicators based on the dual-continua and socio-ecological models) was conducted with 20 experts in the field of mental health and physical activity from Denmark, the Netherlands, the UK, and Ireland. Experts selected the most important indicators and agreed consensus on definitions and their application, where consensus ≥50% signified important indicators. RESULTS: Experts compiled 66 (n = 21 outcome, n = 45 determinant) indicators. Top rated indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives were self-rated mental health (69.2%), physical activity (69.2%) life satisfaction (53.8%), stress (53.8%), loneliness (53.8%), social participation, network, connection and support (53.8%). Consensus on definition and application of the nine indicators varied (44.4% - 100%), with no consensus on a standardised measurement tool reached. CONCLUSIONS: While this study highlights a lack of conformity for evaluating mental health and wellbeing outcomes, it suggests utility in an agreed definition and application of nine indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives, with social determinants of particularly high importance across all countries. Suggested measures are provided to aid community based practitioners measure mental health outcomes of physical activity programmes. Further research is recommended to develop a standardised measurement tool that can be utilised across other European countries and its implementation tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10494023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104940232023-09-12 O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? Aisling, McGrath Murphy, Niamh Evan, Matthews Annemarie, Wagemakers Mark, Tully Kirsten, Verkooijen Eur J Public Health Parallel sessions PURPOSE: While health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) initiatives can improve mental health, there is a lack of standardised measures to evaluate mental health outcomes. The need for the current work emerged from discussions amongst researcher and practitioner members of the HEPA promotion in socially disadvantaged groups Working Group of the HEPA Europe network. This study aimed to identify the most relevant indicators of mental health and well-being in community-based HEPA initiatives in Europe, and determine optimal assessment methods. METHODS: An adapted, two round, Delphi method (guided by an indicator framework to categorise mental health indicators based on the dual-continua and socio-ecological models) was conducted with 20 experts in the field of mental health and physical activity from Denmark, the Netherlands, the UK, and Ireland. Experts selected the most important indicators and agreed consensus on definitions and their application, where consensus ≥50% signified important indicators. RESULTS: Experts compiled 66 (n = 21 outcome, n = 45 determinant) indicators. Top rated indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives were self-rated mental health (69.2%), physical activity (69.2%) life satisfaction (53.8%), stress (53.8%), loneliness (53.8%), social participation, network, connection and support (53.8%). Consensus on definition and application of the nine indicators varied (44.4% - 100%), with no consensus on a standardised measurement tool reached. CONCLUSIONS: While this study highlights a lack of conformity for evaluating mental health and wellbeing outcomes, it suggests utility in an agreed definition and application of nine indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives, with social determinants of particularly high importance across all countries. Suggested measures are provided to aid community based practitioners measure mental health outcomes of physical activity programmes. Further research is recommended to develop a standardised measurement tool that can be utilised across other European countries and its implementation tested. Oxford University Press 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494023/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.079 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Parallel sessions Aisling, McGrath Murphy, Niamh Evan, Matthews Annemarie, Wagemakers Mark, Tully Kirsten, Verkooijen O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
title | O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
title_full | O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
title_fullStr | O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
title_full_unstemmed | O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
title_short | O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
title_sort | o.1.1-3 measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? |
topic | Parallel sessions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494023/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.079 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aislingmcgrath o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation AT murphyniamh o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation AT evanmatthews o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation AT annemariewagemakers o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation AT marktully o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation AT kirstenverkooijen o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation |