Cargando…

O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?

PURPOSE: While health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) initiatives can improve mental health, there is a lack of standardised measures to evaluate mental health outcomes. The need for the current work emerged from discussions amongst researcher and practitioner members of the HEPA promotion in soc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aisling, McGrath, Murphy, Niamh, Evan, Matthews, Annemarie, Wagemakers, Mark, Tully, Kirsten, Verkooijen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494023/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.079
_version_ 1785104598635118592
author Aisling, McGrath
Murphy, Niamh
Evan, Matthews
Annemarie, Wagemakers
Mark, Tully
Kirsten, Verkooijen
author_facet Aisling, McGrath
Murphy, Niamh
Evan, Matthews
Annemarie, Wagemakers
Mark, Tully
Kirsten, Verkooijen
author_sort Aisling, McGrath
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: While health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) initiatives can improve mental health, there is a lack of standardised measures to evaluate mental health outcomes. The need for the current work emerged from discussions amongst researcher and practitioner members of the HEPA promotion in socially disadvantaged groups Working Group of the HEPA Europe network. This study aimed to identify the most relevant indicators of mental health and well-being in community-based HEPA initiatives in Europe, and determine optimal assessment methods. METHODS: An adapted, two round, Delphi method (guided by an indicator framework to categorise mental health indicators based on the dual-continua and socio-ecological models) was conducted with 20 experts in the field of mental health and physical activity from Denmark, the Netherlands, the UK, and Ireland. Experts selected the most important indicators and agreed consensus on definitions and their application, where consensus ≥50% signified important indicators. RESULTS: Experts compiled 66 (n = 21 outcome, n = 45 determinant) indicators. Top rated indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives were self-rated mental health (69.2%), physical activity (69.2%) life satisfaction (53.8%), stress (53.8%), loneliness (53.8%), social participation, network, connection and support (53.8%). Consensus on definition and application of the nine indicators varied (44.4% - 100%), with no consensus on a standardised measurement tool reached. CONCLUSIONS: While this study highlights a lack of conformity for evaluating mental health and wellbeing outcomes, it suggests utility in an agreed definition and application of nine indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives, with social determinants of particularly high importance across all countries. Suggested measures are provided to aid community based practitioners measure mental health outcomes of physical activity programmes. Further research is recommended to develop a standardised measurement tool that can be utilised across other European countries and its implementation tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10494023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104940232023-09-12 O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation? Aisling, McGrath Murphy, Niamh Evan, Matthews Annemarie, Wagemakers Mark, Tully Kirsten, Verkooijen Eur J Public Health Parallel sessions PURPOSE: While health enhancing physical activity (HEPA) initiatives can improve mental health, there is a lack of standardised measures to evaluate mental health outcomes. The need for the current work emerged from discussions amongst researcher and practitioner members of the HEPA promotion in socially disadvantaged groups Working Group of the HEPA Europe network. This study aimed to identify the most relevant indicators of mental health and well-being in community-based HEPA initiatives in Europe, and determine optimal assessment methods. METHODS: An adapted, two round, Delphi method (guided by an indicator framework to categorise mental health indicators based on the dual-continua and socio-ecological models) was conducted with 20 experts in the field of mental health and physical activity from Denmark, the Netherlands, the UK, and Ireland. Experts selected the most important indicators and agreed consensus on definitions and their application, where consensus ≥50% signified important indicators. RESULTS: Experts compiled 66 (n = 21 outcome, n = 45 determinant) indicators. Top rated indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives were self-rated mental health (69.2%), physical activity (69.2%) life satisfaction (53.8%), stress (53.8%), loneliness (53.8%), social participation, network, connection and support (53.8%). Consensus on definition and application of the nine indicators varied (44.4% - 100%), with no consensus on a standardised measurement tool reached. CONCLUSIONS: While this study highlights a lack of conformity for evaluating mental health and wellbeing outcomes, it suggests utility in an agreed definition and application of nine indicators for the evaluation of HEPA initiatives, with social determinants of particularly high importance across all countries. Suggested measures are provided to aid community based practitioners measure mental health outcomes of physical activity programmes. Further research is recommended to develop a standardised measurement tool that can be utilised across other European countries and its implementation tested. Oxford University Press 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494023/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.079 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel sessions
Aisling, McGrath
Murphy, Niamh
Evan, Matthews
Annemarie, Wagemakers
Mark, Tully
Kirsten, Verkooijen
O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
title O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
title_full O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
title_fullStr O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
title_full_unstemmed O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
title_short O.1.1-3 Measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
title_sort o.1.1-3 measuring the mental health benefits of community-based physical activity programmes-what are the most important indicators for pragmatic evaluation?
topic Parallel sessions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494023/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.079
work_keys_str_mv AT aislingmcgrath o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation
AT murphyniamh o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation
AT evanmatthews o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation
AT annemariewagemakers o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation
AT marktully o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation
AT kirstenverkooijen o113measuringthementalhealthbenefitsofcommunitybasedphysicalactivityprogrammeswhatarethemostimportantindicatorsforpragmaticevaluation