Cargando…

O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method

PURPOSE: In Luxembourg, only a small minority of patients with chronic diseases regularly participate in therapeutical physical activity (PA) organised by dedicated associations. As recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), the practitioners should advise their patients to be active. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lion, Alexis, Worth, Michael J, Urhausen, Axel, Theisen, Daniel, Delagardelle, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494100/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.106
_version_ 1785104617133047808
author Lion, Alexis
Worth, Michael J
Urhausen, Axel
Theisen, Daniel
Delagardelle, Charles
author_facet Lion, Alexis
Worth, Michael J
Urhausen, Axel
Theisen, Daniel
Delagardelle, Charles
author_sort Lion, Alexis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In Luxembourg, only a small minority of patients with chronic diseases regularly participate in therapeutical physical activity (PA) organised by dedicated associations. As recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), the practitioners should advise their patients to be active. However, Luxembourg practitioners only provide PA counselling to 1 in 4 of their patients. In this context, we aimed to develop a PA prescription (PAP) that would help efficiently promote PA by Luxembourg practitioners. METHODS: We used a modified-Delphi method which is an iterative survey method to obtain experts opinion with the aim of establishing a consensus. In the first phase, 17 independent experts (medical doctors, sport and exercise scientists, physiotherapists) developed an initial PAP model (the front page contained the PAP, and the reverse page the WHO recommendations, examples of good practice, and contact information) and its user guide. They also created a questionnaire evaluating the front page of the PAP using 39 5-point Likert-scale questions (ranging from totally disagree to totally agree), and the reverse page of the PAP and its user guide using one 5-point Likert-scale question each. In the second phase, this questionnaire was sent to a panel of Luxembourg practitioners. The questions that had not reached consensus among the panellists were sent anew, with the results concerning these items, for re-evaluation. RESULTS: The panel included sixty-six medical doctors. Of the 39 items on the front page of the PAP, six did not reach consensus and had to be re-evaluated in a 2(nd) round, in which 50 practitioners participated. After this 2(nd) round, four items still did not reach consensus and were made optional. As of the first round, a consensus was reached concerning the reverse page of the PAP and its user guide. CONCLUSION: This modified-Delphi study has enabled the development of a consensual and valuable tool for the promotion of PA by practitioners for practitioners. At present, this tool has yet to be implemented, preferably in the framework of a national PA promotion program that addresses the public health challenges associated with physical inactivity. SUPPORT/FUNDING SOURCE: No funding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10494100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104941002023-09-12 O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method Lion, Alexis Worth, Michael J Urhausen, Axel Theisen, Daniel Delagardelle, Charles Eur J Public Health Parallel sessions PURPOSE: In Luxembourg, only a small minority of patients with chronic diseases regularly participate in therapeutical physical activity (PA) organised by dedicated associations. As recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), the practitioners should advise their patients to be active. However, Luxembourg practitioners only provide PA counselling to 1 in 4 of their patients. In this context, we aimed to develop a PA prescription (PAP) that would help efficiently promote PA by Luxembourg practitioners. METHODS: We used a modified-Delphi method which is an iterative survey method to obtain experts opinion with the aim of establishing a consensus. In the first phase, 17 independent experts (medical doctors, sport and exercise scientists, physiotherapists) developed an initial PAP model (the front page contained the PAP, and the reverse page the WHO recommendations, examples of good practice, and contact information) and its user guide. They also created a questionnaire evaluating the front page of the PAP using 39 5-point Likert-scale questions (ranging from totally disagree to totally agree), and the reverse page of the PAP and its user guide using one 5-point Likert-scale question each. In the second phase, this questionnaire was sent to a panel of Luxembourg practitioners. The questions that had not reached consensus among the panellists were sent anew, with the results concerning these items, for re-evaluation. RESULTS: The panel included sixty-six medical doctors. Of the 39 items on the front page of the PAP, six did not reach consensus and had to be re-evaluated in a 2(nd) round, in which 50 practitioners participated. After this 2(nd) round, four items still did not reach consensus and were made optional. As of the first round, a consensus was reached concerning the reverse page of the PAP and its user guide. CONCLUSION: This modified-Delphi study has enabled the development of a consensual and valuable tool for the promotion of PA by practitioners for practitioners. At present, this tool has yet to be implemented, preferably in the framework of a national PA promotion program that addresses the public health challenges associated with physical inactivity. SUPPORT/FUNDING SOURCE: No funding. Oxford University Press 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494100/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.106 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel sessions
Lion, Alexis
Worth, Michael J
Urhausen, Axel
Theisen, Daniel
Delagardelle, Charles
O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method
title O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method
title_full O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method
title_fullStr O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method
title_full_unstemmed O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method
title_short O.2.1-1 Development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-Delphi method
title_sort o.2.1-1 development of a physical activity prescription by practitioners using a modified-delphi method
topic Parallel sessions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494100/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.106
work_keys_str_mv AT lionalexis o211developmentofaphysicalactivityprescriptionbypractitionersusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT worthmichaelj o211developmentofaphysicalactivityprescriptionbypractitionersusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT urhausenaxel o211developmentofaphysicalactivityprescriptionbypractitionersusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT theisendaniel o211developmentofaphysicalactivityprescriptionbypractitionersusingamodifieddelphimethod
AT delagardellecharles o211developmentofaphysicalactivityprescriptionbypractitionersusingamodifieddelphimethod