Cargando…

O.1.3-2 Development and implementation of physical activity policies at national and subnational levels: a pilot study in Latin American countries

PURPOSE: National physical activity (PA) policy processes are only beginning to be documented, and the interaction between the actors involved in these processes remains understudied. This study was designed to gain further insights into the policy process (agenda setting, policy formulation, adopti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grueso, Juliana Mejía, Pratt, Michael, Resendiz, Eugen, Cruz, Gloria Isabel Niño, Gómez, Nubia Yaneth Ruiz, Gómez, Rafael Alexander Leandro, Sánchez, Inés Revuelta, Vargas, Gerardo Alonso Araya, Avilés, Angélica María Ochoa, Jáuregui, Alejandra, Salvo, Deborah, Varela, Andrea Ramírez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494127/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.099
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: National physical activity (PA) policy processes are only beginning to be documented, and the interaction between the actors involved in these processes remains understudied. This study was designed to gain further insights into the policy process (agenda setting, policy formulation, adoption, implementation, evaluation) and the interaction between national and subnational levels. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study to assess the feasibility and scalability of an instrument to assess the PA policy process as part of the work of the Global Physical Activity Observatory (GoPA!). The instrument was tested in Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, and Mexico, where pilot data were collected in matched pairs of the capital plus one non-capital city among national and subnational policy makers (n = 24), as identified by the GoPA! Country Contacts. Descriptive statistics were calculated to assess perceptions on the influences and interactions across the two levels with respect to PA policy development, implementation, and evaluation. RESULTS: Twenty-two (response rate=85.7%) key informants provided data, mostly from the health sector (54.5%), followed by sports (27.3%), education (9.1%), and transport (9.1%) government institutions. Most participants reported that their countries have a current PA policy embedded within a noncommunicable diseases prevention plan (50.0%), other plan (41.7%), or a plan to prevent, manage, or control obesity (8.3%). Respondents at the subnational level rated PA promotion as central (75.0%), while at the national level the role was important but not central (75.0%). Across the five stages of the policy process, national and subnational policy makers reported low-to-little involvement in the other level’s PA policy processes. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of collecting national and subnational PA policy data across countries with the active collaboration of the GoPA! network Country Contacts. Also, we successfully identified the degree of interaction between government levels throughout the PA policy process. Initial results suggest that engagement between national and subnational levels is suboptimal. FUNDING: Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia; University of California San Diego, USA.