Cargando…

O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to explore co-production in practice by examining how public health service and voluntary sports clubs collaborate to support people with chronic illness to participate in physical activity in a Danish community setting. Specifically, our research asked...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Lene Gissel, Skjerning, Halfdan Thorsø, Burau, Viola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494207/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.165
_version_ 1785104642930114560
author Rasmussen, Lene Gissel
Skjerning, Halfdan Thorsø
Burau, Viola
author_facet Rasmussen, Lene Gissel
Skjerning, Halfdan Thorsø
Burau, Viola
author_sort Rasmussen, Lene Gissel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to explore co-production in practice by examining how public health service and voluntary sports clubs collaborate to support people with chronic illness to participate in physical activity in a Danish community setting. Specifically, our research asked the following questions: Which institutional logics guide the practice of co-production in municipalities and voluntary sports clubs? And how do the involved stakeholders co-produce community-based healthcare? The study adopted a critical perspective on the use of co-production to promote physical activity by linking public health service and voluntary sports clubs. METHODS: The study used a critical case study approach to examine the practice of co-production. The analysis was built on qualitative data from nine semi-structured interviews, two information interviews and project documents. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded drawing on the theory of institutional logics. RESULTS: The findings document how the interplay between professionals and volunteers has implications in their everyday practice and offer three central insights into the practice of co-production: Firstly, in the process of co-production the interplay between different and sometimes contradictory logics may lead to conflict, dilemmas, feelings of conflicting pressures and unfulfilled expectations amongst the involved stakeholders. Secondly, the study offers examples of how different logics can be combined and balanced. Here, the stakeholders especially draw on strategies based on the network logic, which facilitates mutual understanding and matching of expectations. Thirdly, the study highlights context-specific variation, where co-production emerged as highly contingent, reflecting the dynamic interaction between logics and the context-specific management by the involved professionals and the sports club volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: This study makes an original contribution to the conceptual understanding of co-production in healthcare service, thus emphasising the benefit of paying attention to the network logic when building bridges between public healthcare service and voluntary sports clubs to promote physical activity – and to unite the seemingly contradictory “why” and “how” of co-production in practice. SUPPORT/FUNDING SOURCE: No funding to declare. Published in Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2022, Vol. 43 No. 1/2, pp. 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2022-0027
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10494207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104942072023-09-12 O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark Rasmussen, Lene Gissel Skjerning, Halfdan Thorsø Burau, Viola Eur J Public Health Parallel sessions PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to explore co-production in practice by examining how public health service and voluntary sports clubs collaborate to support people with chronic illness to participate in physical activity in a Danish community setting. Specifically, our research asked the following questions: Which institutional logics guide the practice of co-production in municipalities and voluntary sports clubs? And how do the involved stakeholders co-produce community-based healthcare? The study adopted a critical perspective on the use of co-production to promote physical activity by linking public health service and voluntary sports clubs. METHODS: The study used a critical case study approach to examine the practice of co-production. The analysis was built on qualitative data from nine semi-structured interviews, two information interviews and project documents. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded drawing on the theory of institutional logics. RESULTS: The findings document how the interplay between professionals and volunteers has implications in their everyday practice and offer three central insights into the practice of co-production: Firstly, in the process of co-production the interplay between different and sometimes contradictory logics may lead to conflict, dilemmas, feelings of conflicting pressures and unfulfilled expectations amongst the involved stakeholders. Secondly, the study offers examples of how different logics can be combined and balanced. Here, the stakeholders especially draw on strategies based on the network logic, which facilitates mutual understanding and matching of expectations. Thirdly, the study highlights context-specific variation, where co-production emerged as highly contingent, reflecting the dynamic interaction between logics and the context-specific management by the involved professionals and the sports club volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: This study makes an original contribution to the conceptual understanding of co-production in healthcare service, thus emphasising the benefit of paying attention to the network logic when building bridges between public healthcare service and voluntary sports clubs to promote physical activity – and to unite the seemingly contradictory “why” and “how” of co-production in practice. SUPPORT/FUNDING SOURCE: No funding to declare. Published in Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2022, Vol. 43 No. 1/2, pp. 197-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2022-0027 Oxford University Press 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494207/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.165 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Parallel sessions
Rasmussen, Lene Gissel
Skjerning, Halfdan Thorsø
Burau, Viola
O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark
title O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark
title_full O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark
title_fullStr O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark
title_full_unstemmed O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark
title_short O.3.3-10 The why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in Denmark
title_sort o.3.3-10 the why and how of co-production between professionals and volunteers: a qualitative study of community-based healthcare in denmark
topic Parallel sessions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494207/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad133.165
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenlenegissel o3310thewhyandhowofcoproductionbetweenprofessionalsandvolunteersaqualitativestudyofcommunitybasedhealthcareindenmark
AT skjerninghalfdanthorsø o3310thewhyandhowofcoproductionbetweenprofessionalsandvolunteersaqualitativestudyofcommunitybasedhealthcareindenmark
AT burauviola o3310thewhyandhowofcoproductionbetweenprofessionalsandvolunteersaqualitativestudyofcommunitybasedhealthcareindenmark