Cargando…

Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning

Preoperative planning of comminuted fracture repair using 3D printed anatomical models is enabling surgeons to visualize and simulate the fracture reduction processes before surgery. However, the preparation of such models can be challenging due to the complexity of certain fractures, particularly i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paxton, Naomi C., Wilkinson, Brandon G., Fitzpatrick, Daniel, Owen, Erin C., Luposchainsky, Simon, Dalton, Paul D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00189-5
_version_ 1785104682066116608
author Paxton, Naomi C.
Wilkinson, Brandon G.
Fitzpatrick, Daniel
Owen, Erin C.
Luposchainsky, Simon
Dalton, Paul D.
author_facet Paxton, Naomi C.
Wilkinson, Brandon G.
Fitzpatrick, Daniel
Owen, Erin C.
Luposchainsky, Simon
Dalton, Paul D.
author_sort Paxton, Naomi C.
collection PubMed
description Preoperative planning of comminuted fracture repair using 3D printed anatomical models is enabling surgeons to visualize and simulate the fracture reduction processes before surgery. However, the preparation of such models can be challenging due to the complexity of certain fractures, particularly in preserving fine detail in bone fragments, maintaining the positioning of displaced fragments, and accurate positioning of multiple bones. This study described several key technical considerations for preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning. An optimized segmentation protocol was developed that preserves fine detail in bone fragments, resulting in a more accurate representation of the fracture. Additionally, struts were manually added to the digital model to maintain the positioning of displaced fragments after fabrication, reducing the likelihood of errors during printing or misrepresentation of fragment positioning. Magnets were also used to enable separation and visualization of accurate positioning of multiple bones, making it easier to visualize fracture components otherwise obscured by the anatomy. Finally, the infill for non-target structures was adjusted to minimize print time and material wastage. These technical optimizations improved the accuracy and efficiency of preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning, improving opportunities for surgeons to better plan surgical treatment in advance, reducing the likelihood of errors, with the goal of improving surgical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10494395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104943952023-09-12 Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning Paxton, Naomi C. Wilkinson, Brandon G. Fitzpatrick, Daniel Owen, Erin C. Luposchainsky, Simon Dalton, Paul D. 3D Print Med Research Preoperative planning of comminuted fracture repair using 3D printed anatomical models is enabling surgeons to visualize and simulate the fracture reduction processes before surgery. However, the preparation of such models can be challenging due to the complexity of certain fractures, particularly in preserving fine detail in bone fragments, maintaining the positioning of displaced fragments, and accurate positioning of multiple bones. This study described several key technical considerations for preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning. An optimized segmentation protocol was developed that preserves fine detail in bone fragments, resulting in a more accurate representation of the fracture. Additionally, struts were manually added to the digital model to maintain the positioning of displaced fragments after fabrication, reducing the likelihood of errors during printing or misrepresentation of fragment positioning. Magnets were also used to enable separation and visualization of accurate positioning of multiple bones, making it easier to visualize fracture components otherwise obscured by the anatomy. Finally, the infill for non-target structures was adjusted to minimize print time and material wastage. These technical optimizations improved the accuracy and efficiency of preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning, improving opportunities for surgeons to better plan surgical treatment in advance, reducing the likelihood of errors, with the goal of improving surgical outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494395/ /pubmed/37695521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00189-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Paxton, Naomi C.
Wilkinson, Brandon G.
Fitzpatrick, Daniel
Owen, Erin C.
Luposchainsky, Simon
Dalton, Paul D.
Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
title Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
title_full Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
title_fullStr Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
title_full_unstemmed Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
title_short Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
title_sort technical improvements in preparing 3d printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00189-5
work_keys_str_mv AT paxtonnaomic technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning
AT wilkinsonbrandong technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning
AT fitzpatrickdaniel technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning
AT owenerinc technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning
AT luposchainskysimon technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning
AT daltonpauld technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning