Cargando…
Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning
Preoperative planning of comminuted fracture repair using 3D printed anatomical models is enabling surgeons to visualize and simulate the fracture reduction processes before surgery. However, the preparation of such models can be challenging due to the complexity of certain fractures, particularly i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00189-5 |
_version_ | 1785104682066116608 |
---|---|
author | Paxton, Naomi C. Wilkinson, Brandon G. Fitzpatrick, Daniel Owen, Erin C. Luposchainsky, Simon Dalton, Paul D. |
author_facet | Paxton, Naomi C. Wilkinson, Brandon G. Fitzpatrick, Daniel Owen, Erin C. Luposchainsky, Simon Dalton, Paul D. |
author_sort | Paxton, Naomi C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Preoperative planning of comminuted fracture repair using 3D printed anatomical models is enabling surgeons to visualize and simulate the fracture reduction processes before surgery. However, the preparation of such models can be challenging due to the complexity of certain fractures, particularly in preserving fine detail in bone fragments, maintaining the positioning of displaced fragments, and accurate positioning of multiple bones. This study described several key technical considerations for preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning. An optimized segmentation protocol was developed that preserves fine detail in bone fragments, resulting in a more accurate representation of the fracture. Additionally, struts were manually added to the digital model to maintain the positioning of displaced fragments after fabrication, reducing the likelihood of errors during printing or misrepresentation of fragment positioning. Magnets were also used to enable separation and visualization of accurate positioning of multiple bones, making it easier to visualize fracture components otherwise obscured by the anatomy. Finally, the infill for non-target structures was adjusted to minimize print time and material wastage. These technical optimizations improved the accuracy and efficiency of preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning, improving opportunities for surgeons to better plan surgical treatment in advance, reducing the likelihood of errors, with the goal of improving surgical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10494395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104943952023-09-12 Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning Paxton, Naomi C. Wilkinson, Brandon G. Fitzpatrick, Daniel Owen, Erin C. Luposchainsky, Simon Dalton, Paul D. 3D Print Med Research Preoperative planning of comminuted fracture repair using 3D printed anatomical models is enabling surgeons to visualize and simulate the fracture reduction processes before surgery. However, the preparation of such models can be challenging due to the complexity of certain fractures, particularly in preserving fine detail in bone fragments, maintaining the positioning of displaced fragments, and accurate positioning of multiple bones. This study described several key technical considerations for preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning. An optimized segmentation protocol was developed that preserves fine detail in bone fragments, resulting in a more accurate representation of the fracture. Additionally, struts were manually added to the digital model to maintain the positioning of displaced fragments after fabrication, reducing the likelihood of errors during printing or misrepresentation of fragment positioning. Magnets were also used to enable separation and visualization of accurate positioning of multiple bones, making it easier to visualize fracture components otherwise obscured by the anatomy. Finally, the infill for non-target structures was adjusted to minimize print time and material wastage. These technical optimizations improved the accuracy and efficiency of preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning, improving opportunities for surgeons to better plan surgical treatment in advance, reducing the likelihood of errors, with the goal of improving surgical outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10494395/ /pubmed/37695521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00189-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Paxton, Naomi C. Wilkinson, Brandon G. Fitzpatrick, Daniel Owen, Erin C. Luposchainsky, Simon Dalton, Paul D. Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
title | Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
title_full | Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
title_fullStr | Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
title_short | Technical improvements in preparing 3D printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
title_sort | technical improvements in preparing 3d printed anatomical models for comminuted fracture preoperative planning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37695521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00189-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paxtonnaomic technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning AT wilkinsonbrandong technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning AT fitzpatrickdaniel technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning AT owenerinc technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning AT luposchainskysimon technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning AT daltonpauld technicalimprovementsinpreparing3dprintedanatomicalmodelsforcomminutedfracturepreoperativeplanning |