Cargando…

Microbiome dysbiosis occurred in hypertrophic scars is dominated by S. aureus colonization

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of hypertrophic scar formation and its tissue inflammation remain unknown. METHODS: We collected 33 hypertrophic scar (HS) and 36 normal skin (NS) tissues, and detected the tissue inflammation and bacteria using HE staining, Gram staining, and transmission electronic micro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Jiarong, Mao, Zhigang, Zhou, Zengding, Yuan, Bo, Wang, Xiqiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1227024
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The mechanisms of hypertrophic scar formation and its tissue inflammation remain unknown. METHODS: We collected 33 hypertrophic scar (HS) and 36 normal skin (NS) tissues, and detected the tissue inflammation and bacteria using HE staining, Gram staining, and transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8. In addition, the samples were assayed by 16S rRNA sequencing to investigate the microbiota diversity in HS, and the correlation between the microbiota and the indices of Vancouver Scar Scale(VSS)score. RESULTS: HE staining showed that a dramatically increased number of inflammatory cells accumulated in HS compared with NS, and an enhanced number of bacteria colonies was found in HS by Gram staining, even individual bacteria could be clearly observed by TEM. In situ hybridization demonstrated that the bacteria and inflammation cells co-localized in the HS tissues, and immunohistochemistry indicated the expression of MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 were significantly upregulated in HS than that in NS. In addition, there was a significantly different microbiota composition between HS and NS. At the phylum level, Firmicutes was significantly higher in HS than NS. At the genus level, S. aureus was the dominant species, which was significantly higher in HS than NS, and was strongly correlated with VSS indices. CONCLUSION: Microbiome dysbiosis, dominated by S. aureus, occurred in HS formation, which is correlated with chronic inflammation and scar formation, targeting the microbiome dysbiosis is perhaps a supplementary way for future scar management.