Cargando…

Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review

BACKGROUND: Changes to provider payment systems are among the most common reforms in health care. They are important levers for policymakers to influence the health system performance. The aim of this study was to identify, systematize, and map the existing literature on the factors that influence h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ndayishimiye, Costase, Tambor, Marzena, Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701321
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S420529
_version_ 1785104797025697792
author Ndayishimiye, Costase
Tambor, Marzena
Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
author_facet Ndayishimiye, Costase
Tambor, Marzena
Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
author_sort Ndayishimiye, Costase
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Changes to provider payment systems are among the most common reforms in health care. They are important levers for policymakers to influence the health system performance. The aim of this study was to identify, systematize, and map the existing literature on the factors that influence health-care provider payment reforms. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted. Literature published in English between 2000 and 2022 was systematically searched in five databases, relevant organizations, and journals. Academic publications and grey literature on health-care provider payment reform and the factors influencing reform were considered. An inductive thematic analysis was applied to map the barriers and facilitators that influence payment reforms. RESULTS: The study included 51 publications. They were divided into four categories: empirical studies (n=17), literature reviews (n=6), discussion/policy papers (n=18), and technical reports/policy briefs (n=9). Most of the studies were conducted in developed economy countries (n=36). The most frequently reformed payment method was fee-for-service (n=37), and the newly implemented methods included bundled payments (n=16), pay-for-performance (n=15), and diagnosis-related groups (n=11). This study identified 43 sub-themes on barriers to provider payment reforms, which were grouped into eight main themes. It identified 51 sub-themes on facilitators, which were grouped into six themes. Barriers include stakeholder opposition, challenges related to reform design, hurdles in implementation structures, insufficient resources, challenges related to market structures, legal barriers, knowledge and information gaps, and negative publicity. Facilitators include stakeholder involvement, complementary reforms/policies, relevant prior experience, good leadership and management of change, sufficient resources, and external pressure to introduce reform. CONCLUSION: The factors that influence health-care payment reforms are often contextual and interrelated, and encompass a variety of perspectives, including those of patients, providers, insurers, and policymakers. When planning reforms, one should anticipate potential barriers and devise appropriate interventions. REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10494919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104949192023-09-12 Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review Ndayishimiye, Costase Tambor, Marzena Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review BACKGROUND: Changes to provider payment systems are among the most common reforms in health care. They are important levers for policymakers to influence the health system performance. The aim of this study was to identify, systematize, and map the existing literature on the factors that influence health-care provider payment reforms. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted. Literature published in English between 2000 and 2022 was systematically searched in five databases, relevant organizations, and journals. Academic publications and grey literature on health-care provider payment reform and the factors influencing reform were considered. An inductive thematic analysis was applied to map the barriers and facilitators that influence payment reforms. RESULTS: The study included 51 publications. They were divided into four categories: empirical studies (n=17), literature reviews (n=6), discussion/policy papers (n=18), and technical reports/policy briefs (n=9). Most of the studies were conducted in developed economy countries (n=36). The most frequently reformed payment method was fee-for-service (n=37), and the newly implemented methods included bundled payments (n=16), pay-for-performance (n=15), and diagnosis-related groups (n=11). This study identified 43 sub-themes on barriers to provider payment reforms, which were grouped into eight main themes. It identified 51 sub-themes on facilitators, which were grouped into six themes. Barriers include stakeholder opposition, challenges related to reform design, hurdles in implementation structures, insufficient resources, challenges related to market structures, legal barriers, knowledge and information gaps, and negative publicity. Facilitators include stakeholder involvement, complementary reforms/policies, relevant prior experience, good leadership and management of change, sufficient resources, and external pressure to introduce reform. CONCLUSION: The factors that influence health-care payment reforms are often contextual and interrelated, and encompass a variety of perspectives, including those of patients, providers, insurers, and policymakers. When planning reforms, one should anticipate potential barriers and devise appropriate interventions. REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Open Science Framework. Dove 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10494919/ /pubmed/37701321 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S420529 Text en © 2023 Ndayishimiye et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Ndayishimiye, Costase
Tambor, Marzena
Dubas-Jakóbczyk, Katarzyna
Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review
title Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review
title_full Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review
title_fullStr Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review
title_short Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform – A Scoping Literature Review
title_sort barriers and facilitators to health-care provider payment reform – a scoping literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37701321
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S420529
work_keys_str_mv AT ndayishimiyecostase barriersandfacilitatorstohealthcareproviderpaymentreformascopingliteraturereview
AT tambormarzena barriersandfacilitatorstohealthcareproviderpaymentreformascopingliteraturereview
AT dubasjakobczykkatarzyna barriersandfacilitatorstohealthcareproviderpaymentreformascopingliteraturereview