Cargando…

Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study

BACKGROUND: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: You, Xiaolin, Wang, Yanyun, Zheng, Ying, Yang, Fan, Wang, Qiao, Min, Ling, Wang, Kana, Wang, Na
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37700843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235
_version_ 1785104843907530752
author You, Xiaolin
Wang, Yanyun
Zheng, Ying
Yang, Fan
Wang, Qiao
Min, Ling
Wang, Kana
Wang, Na
author_facet You, Xiaolin
Wang, Yanyun
Zheng, Ying
Yang, Fan
Wang, Qiao
Min, Ling
Wang, Kana
Wang, Na
author_sort You, Xiaolin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875). CONCLUSION: TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10495218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104952182023-09-12 Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study You, Xiaolin Wang, Yanyun Zheng, Ying Yang, Fan Wang, Qiao Min, Ling Wang, Kana Wang, Na Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875). CONCLUSION: TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10495218/ /pubmed/37700843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235 Text en Copyright © 2023 You, Wang, Zheng, Yang, Wang, Min, Wang and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
You, Xiaolin
Wang, Yanyun
Zheng, Ying
Yang, Fan
Wang, Qiao
Min, Ling
Wang, Kana
Wang, Na
Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
title Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
title_full Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
title_fullStr Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
title_short Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
title_sort efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37700843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235
work_keys_str_mv AT youxiaolin efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT wangyanyun efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT zhengying efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT yangfan efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT wangqiao efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT minling efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT wangkana efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy
AT wangna efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy