Cargando…
Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study
BACKGROUND: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37700843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235 |
_version_ | 1785104843907530752 |
---|---|
author | You, Xiaolin Wang, Yanyun Zheng, Ying Yang, Fan Wang, Qiao Min, Ling Wang, Kana Wang, Na |
author_facet | You, Xiaolin Wang, Yanyun Zheng, Ying Yang, Fan Wang, Qiao Min, Ling Wang, Kana Wang, Na |
author_sort | You, Xiaolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875). CONCLUSION: TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10495218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104952182023-09-12 Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study You, Xiaolin Wang, Yanyun Zheng, Ying Yang, Fan Wang, Qiao Min, Ling Wang, Kana Wang, Na Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Although single-port laparoscopy surgery has been evaluated for several years, it has not been widely adopted by gynecologic oncologists. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes and survival of endometrial cancer (EC) patients undergoing transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MLS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative monocentric study including patients treated between December 2017 and October 2021. The perioperative outcomes and survival of EC patients who had surgery via TU-LESS or MLS were compared, by propensity matching. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included (TU-LESS vs. MLS: 78 vs. 78). The conversion rate of TU-LESS and MLS was 5.13% and 2.56%, respectively (P=0.681). The operation time was comparable between the two groups [207.5min (180-251) vs. 197.5min (168.8-225), P=0.095]. There was no significant difference between the two groups in exhaustion time, perioperative complications, or postoperative complications. While, the TU-LESS group had a shorter out-of-bed activity time [36 hours (24-48) vs. 48 hours (48-72), P<0.001] and a lower visual analog pain scale 36 hours after surgery [1 (1-2) vs. 2 (1-2), P<0.001] than the MLS group. The length of hospital stay was similar in the two groups [5(4-6) vs. 5(4-5), P=0.599]. Following surgery, 38.5% of the TU-LESS patients and 41% of the MLS patients got adjuvant therapy (P=0.744). The median follow-up time for TU-LESS and MLS cohorts was 45 months (range: 20-66) and 43 months (range: 18-66), respectively. One TU-LESS patient and one MLS patient died following recurrence. The 4-year overall survival was similar in both groups (98.3% vs. 98.5%, P=0.875). CONCLUSION: TU-LESS is a feasible and safe option with comparable perioperative outcomes and survival of MLS in endometrial cancer. With the growing acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy, TU-LESS of endometrial cancer may be a viable option for patients and surgeons. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10495218/ /pubmed/37700843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235 Text en Copyright © 2023 You, Wang, Zheng, Yang, Wang, Min, Wang and Wang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology You, Xiaolin Wang, Yanyun Zheng, Ying Yang, Fan Wang, Qiao Min, Ling Wang, Kana Wang, Na Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
title | Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
title_full | Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
title_short | Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
title_sort | efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37700843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1181235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youxiaolin efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT wangyanyun efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT zhengying efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT yangfan efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT wangqiao efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT minling efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT wangkana efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy AT wangna efficacyoftransumbilicallaparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgeryversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryforendometrialcanceraretrospectivecomparisonstudy |