Cargando…
Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species
Cotton has been used as a model plant to study direct and indirect plant defence against herbivorous insects. However, the plant growing conditions could have an important effect on the outcome of such plant defence studies. We examined how common experimental growth conditions influence constitutiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-023-01422-5 |
_version_ | 1785104857769705472 |
---|---|
author | Chappuis, Laura Egger, Alicia Roeder, Gregory Glauser, Gaétan Jaffuel, Geoffrey Benrey, Betty Abdala-Roberts, Luis Clancy, Mary V. Turlings, Ted C. J. Bustos-Segura, Carlos |
author_facet | Chappuis, Laura Egger, Alicia Roeder, Gregory Glauser, Gaétan Jaffuel, Geoffrey Benrey, Betty Abdala-Roberts, Luis Clancy, Mary V. Turlings, Ted C. J. Bustos-Segura, Carlos |
author_sort | Chappuis, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cotton has been used as a model plant to study direct and indirect plant defence against herbivorous insects. However, the plant growing conditions could have an important effect on the outcome of such plant defence studies. We examined how common experimental growth conditions influence constitutive and inducible defences in two species of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum and G. herbaceum. We induced plants by applying caterpillar regurgitant to mechanical wounds to compare the induction levels between plants of both species grown in greenhouse or phytotron conditions. For this we measured defence metabolites (gossypol and heliocides) and performance of Spodoptera frugiperda caterpillars on different leaves, the emission of plant volatiles, and their attractiveness to parasitic wasps. Induction increased the levels of defence metabolites, which in turn decreased the performance of S. frugiperda larvae. Constitutive and induced defence levels were the highest in plants grown in the phytotron (compared to greenhouse plants), G. hirsutum and young leaves. Defence induction was more pronounced in plants grown in the phytotron and in young leaves. Also, the differences between growing conditions were more evident for metabolites in the youngest leaves, indicating an interaction with plant ontogeny. The composition of emitted volatiles was different between plants from the two growth conditions, with greenhouse-grown plants showing more variation than phytotron-grown plants. Also, G. hirsutum released higher amounts of volatiles and attracted more parasitic wasps than G. herbaceum. Overall, these results highlight the importance of experimental abiotic factors in plant defence induction and ontogeny of defences. We therefore suggest careful consideration in selecting the appropriate experimental growing conditions for studies on plant defences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10886-023-01422-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10495274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104952742023-09-13 Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species Chappuis, Laura Egger, Alicia Roeder, Gregory Glauser, Gaétan Jaffuel, Geoffrey Benrey, Betty Abdala-Roberts, Luis Clancy, Mary V. Turlings, Ted C. J. Bustos-Segura, Carlos J Chem Ecol Research Cotton has been used as a model plant to study direct and indirect plant defence against herbivorous insects. However, the plant growing conditions could have an important effect on the outcome of such plant defence studies. We examined how common experimental growth conditions influence constitutive and inducible defences in two species of cotton, Gossypium hirsutum and G. herbaceum. We induced plants by applying caterpillar regurgitant to mechanical wounds to compare the induction levels between plants of both species grown in greenhouse or phytotron conditions. For this we measured defence metabolites (gossypol and heliocides) and performance of Spodoptera frugiperda caterpillars on different leaves, the emission of plant volatiles, and their attractiveness to parasitic wasps. Induction increased the levels of defence metabolites, which in turn decreased the performance of S. frugiperda larvae. Constitutive and induced defence levels were the highest in plants grown in the phytotron (compared to greenhouse plants), G. hirsutum and young leaves. Defence induction was more pronounced in plants grown in the phytotron and in young leaves. Also, the differences between growing conditions were more evident for metabolites in the youngest leaves, indicating an interaction with plant ontogeny. The composition of emitted volatiles was different between plants from the two growth conditions, with greenhouse-grown plants showing more variation than phytotron-grown plants. Also, G. hirsutum released higher amounts of volatiles and attracted more parasitic wasps than G. herbaceum. Overall, these results highlight the importance of experimental abiotic factors in plant defence induction and ontogeny of defences. We therefore suggest careful consideration in selecting the appropriate experimental growing conditions for studies on plant defences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10886-023-01422-5. Springer US 2023-05-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10495274/ /pubmed/37160550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-023-01422-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Chappuis, Laura Egger, Alicia Roeder, Gregory Glauser, Gaétan Jaffuel, Geoffrey Benrey, Betty Abdala-Roberts, Luis Clancy, Mary V. Turlings, Ted C. J. Bustos-Segura, Carlos Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species |
title | Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species |
title_full | Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species |
title_fullStr | Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species |
title_short | Experimental Growth Conditions affect Direct and Indirect Defences in two Cotton Species |
title_sort | experimental growth conditions affect direct and indirect defences in two cotton species |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-023-01422-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chappuislaura experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT eggeralicia experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT roedergregory experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT glausergaetan experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT jaffuelgeoffrey experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT benreybetty experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT abdalarobertsluis experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT clancymaryv experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT turlingstedcj experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies AT bustosseguracarlos experimentalgrowthconditionsaffectdirectandindirectdefencesintwocottonspecies |