Cargando…

Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity

Previous genetic studies of pollinator wasps associated with a community of strangler figs (Ficus subgenus Urostigma, section Americana) in Central Panama suggest that the wasp species exhibit a range in host specificity across their host figs. To better understand factors that might contribute to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oldenbeuving, Aafke, Gómez‐Zúniga, Adalberto, Florez‐Buitrago, Ximena, Gutiérrez‐Zuluaga, Ana M., Machado, Carlos A., Van Dooren, Tom J. M., van Alphen, Jacques, Biesmeijer, Jacobus C., Herre, Edward Allen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10501
_version_ 1785104920607719424
author Oldenbeuving, Aafke
Gómez‐Zúniga, Adalberto
Florez‐Buitrago, Ximena
Gutiérrez‐Zuluaga, Ana M.
Machado, Carlos A.
Van Dooren, Tom J. M.
van Alphen, Jacques
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
Herre, Edward Allen
author_facet Oldenbeuving, Aafke
Gómez‐Zúniga, Adalberto
Florez‐Buitrago, Ximena
Gutiérrez‐Zuluaga, Ana M.
Machado, Carlos A.
Van Dooren, Tom J. M.
van Alphen, Jacques
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
Herre, Edward Allen
author_sort Oldenbeuving, Aafke
collection PubMed
description Previous genetic studies of pollinator wasps associated with a community of strangler figs (Ficus subgenus Urostigma, section Americana) in Central Panama suggest that the wasp species exhibit a range in host specificity across their host figs. To better understand factors that might contribute to this observed range of specificity, we used sticky traps to capture fig‐pollinating wasp individuals at 13 Ficus species, sampling at different phases of the reproductive cycle of the host figs (e.g., trees with receptive inflorescences, or vegetative trees, bearing only leaves). We also sampled at other tree species, using them as non‐Ficus controls. DNA barcoding allowed us to identify the wasps to species and therefore assign their presence and abundance to host fig species and the developmental phase of that individual tree. We found: (1) wasps were only very rarely captured at non‐Ficus trees; (2) nonetheless, pollinators were captured often at vegetative individuals of some host species; (3) overwhelmingly, wasp individuals were captured at receptive host fig trees representing the fig species from which they usually emerge. Our results indicate that wasp occurrence is not random either spatially or temporally within the forest and across these hosts, and that wasp specificity is generally high, both at receptive and vegetative host trees. Therefore, in addition to studies that show chemicals produced by receptive fig inflorescences attract pollinator wasps, we suggest that other cues (e.g., chemicals produced by the leaves) can also play a role in host recognition. We discuss our results in the context of recent findings on the role of host shifts in diversification processes in the Ficus genus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10495548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104955482023-09-13 Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity Oldenbeuving, Aafke Gómez‐Zúniga, Adalberto Florez‐Buitrago, Ximena Gutiérrez‐Zuluaga, Ana M. Machado, Carlos A. Van Dooren, Tom J. M. van Alphen, Jacques Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. Herre, Edward Allen Ecol Evol Research Articles Previous genetic studies of pollinator wasps associated with a community of strangler figs (Ficus subgenus Urostigma, section Americana) in Central Panama suggest that the wasp species exhibit a range in host specificity across their host figs. To better understand factors that might contribute to this observed range of specificity, we used sticky traps to capture fig‐pollinating wasp individuals at 13 Ficus species, sampling at different phases of the reproductive cycle of the host figs (e.g., trees with receptive inflorescences, or vegetative trees, bearing only leaves). We also sampled at other tree species, using them as non‐Ficus controls. DNA barcoding allowed us to identify the wasps to species and therefore assign their presence and abundance to host fig species and the developmental phase of that individual tree. We found: (1) wasps were only very rarely captured at non‐Ficus trees; (2) nonetheless, pollinators were captured often at vegetative individuals of some host species; (3) overwhelmingly, wasp individuals were captured at receptive host fig trees representing the fig species from which they usually emerge. Our results indicate that wasp occurrence is not random either spatially or temporally within the forest and across these hosts, and that wasp specificity is generally high, both at receptive and vegetative host trees. Therefore, in addition to studies that show chemicals produced by receptive fig inflorescences attract pollinator wasps, we suggest that other cues (e.g., chemicals produced by the leaves) can also play a role in host recognition. We discuss our results in the context of recent findings on the role of host shifts in diversification processes in the Ficus genus. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10495548/ /pubmed/37706164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10501 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Oldenbeuving, Aafke
Gómez‐Zúniga, Adalberto
Florez‐Buitrago, Ximena
Gutiérrez‐Zuluaga, Ana M.
Machado, Carlos A.
Van Dooren, Tom J. M.
van Alphen, Jacques
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
Herre, Edward Allen
Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity
title Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity
title_full Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity
title_fullStr Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity
title_full_unstemmed Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity
title_short Field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: Implications for host recognition and specificity
title_sort field sampling of fig pollinator wasps across host species and host developmental phase: implications for host recognition and specificity
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10501
work_keys_str_mv AT oldenbeuvingaafke fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT gomezzunigaadalberto fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT florezbuitragoximena fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT gutierrezzuluagaanam fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT machadocarlosa fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT vandoorentomjm fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT vanalphenjacques fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT biesmeijerjacobusc fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity
AT herreedwardallen fieldsamplingoffigpollinatorwaspsacrosshostspeciesandhostdevelopmentalphaseimplicationsforhostrecognitionandspecificity