Cargando…

Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra

PURPOSE: While 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) provides valuable spatial metabolic information, one of the hurdles for clinical translation is its interpretation, with voxel-wise quality control (QC) as an essential and the most time-consuming step. This work evaluates the accuracy of machine lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaziri, Sana, Liu, Huawei, Xie, Emily, Ratiney, Hélène, Sdika, Michaël, Lupo, Janine M., Xu, Duan, Li, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1219343
_version_ 1785104928225624064
author Vaziri, Sana
Liu, Huawei
Xie, Emily
Ratiney, Hélène
Sdika, Michaël
Lupo, Janine M.
Xu, Duan
Li, Yan
author_facet Vaziri, Sana
Liu, Huawei
Xie, Emily
Ratiney, Hélène
Sdika, Michaël
Lupo, Janine M.
Xu, Duan
Li, Yan
author_sort Vaziri, Sana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: While 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) provides valuable spatial metabolic information, one of the hurdles for clinical translation is its interpretation, with voxel-wise quality control (QC) as an essential and the most time-consuming step. This work evaluates the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models for automated QC filtering of individual spectra from 3D healthy control and patient datasets. METHODS: A total of 53 3D MRSI datasets from prior studies (30 neurological diseases, 13 brain tumors, and 10 healthy controls) were included in the study. Three ML models were evaluated: a random forest classifier (RF), a convolutional neural network (CNN), and an inception CNN (ICNN) along with two hybrid models: CNN + RF, ICNN + RF. QC labels used for training were determined manually through consensus of two MRSI experts. Normalized and cropped real-valued spectra was used as input. A cross-validation approach was used to separate datasets into training/validation/testing sets of aggregated voxels. RESULTS: All models achieved a minimum AUC of 0.964 and accuracy of 0.910. In datasets from neurological disease and controls, the CNN model produced the highest AUC (0.982), while the RF model achieved the highest AUC in patients with brain tumors (0.976). Within tumor lesions, which typically exhibit abnormal metabolism, the CNN AUC was 0.973 while that of the RF was 0.969. Data quality inference times were on the order of seconds for an entire 3D dataset, offering drastic time reduction compared to manual labeling. CONCLUSION: ML methods accurately and rapidly performed automated QC. Results in tumors highlights the applicability to a variety of metabolic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10495580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104955802023-09-13 Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra Vaziri, Sana Liu, Huawei Xie, Emily Ratiney, Hélène Sdika, Michaël Lupo, Janine M. Xu, Duan Li, Yan Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: While 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) provides valuable spatial metabolic information, one of the hurdles for clinical translation is its interpretation, with voxel-wise quality control (QC) as an essential and the most time-consuming step. This work evaluates the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models for automated QC filtering of individual spectra from 3D healthy control and patient datasets. METHODS: A total of 53 3D MRSI datasets from prior studies (30 neurological diseases, 13 brain tumors, and 10 healthy controls) were included in the study. Three ML models were evaluated: a random forest classifier (RF), a convolutional neural network (CNN), and an inception CNN (ICNN) along with two hybrid models: CNN + RF, ICNN + RF. QC labels used for training were determined manually through consensus of two MRSI experts. Normalized and cropped real-valued spectra was used as input. A cross-validation approach was used to separate datasets into training/validation/testing sets of aggregated voxels. RESULTS: All models achieved a minimum AUC of 0.964 and accuracy of 0.910. In datasets from neurological disease and controls, the CNN model produced the highest AUC (0.982), while the RF model achieved the highest AUC in patients with brain tumors (0.976). Within tumor lesions, which typically exhibit abnormal metabolism, the CNN AUC was 0.973 while that of the RF was 0.969. Data quality inference times were on the order of seconds for an entire 3D dataset, offering drastic time reduction compared to manual labeling. CONCLUSION: ML methods accurately and rapidly performed automated QC. Results in tumors highlights the applicability to a variety of metabolic conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10495580/ /pubmed/37706154 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1219343 Text en Copyright © 2023 Vaziri, Liu, Xie, Ratiney, Sdika, Lupo, Xu and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Vaziri, Sana
Liu, Huawei
Xie, Emily
Ratiney, Hélène
Sdika, Michaël
Lupo, Janine M.
Xu, Duan
Li, Yan
Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra
title Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra
title_full Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra
title_fullStr Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra
title_short Evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of MR spectra
title_sort evaluation of deep learning models for quality control of mr spectra
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37706154
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1219343
work_keys_str_mv AT vazirisana evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT liuhuawei evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT xieemily evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT ratineyhelene evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT sdikamichael evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT lupojaninem evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT xuduan evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra
AT liyan evaluationofdeeplearningmodelsforqualitycontrolofmrspectra