Cargando…

Evaluation of a semi-automated approach for FDG PET image analysis for routine clinical application in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: FDG PET/CT is a tool for assessing response to therapy in various cancers, and may provide an earlier biomarker of clinical response. We developed a novel semi-automated approach for analyzing FDG PET/CT images in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) to standardize FDG PET application. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wellman, Tyler J, Mudd, Sarah R, Godby, Kelly N, Wooten, Dustin W, Ross, Jeremy A, Bueno, Orlando F, Wanik, Danielle, Divgi, Chaitanya R, Comley, Robert A, Costa, Luciano J, Hesterman, Jacob Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10495672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37657154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101767
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: FDG PET/CT is a tool for assessing response to therapy in various cancers, and may provide an earlier biomarker of clinical response. We developed a novel semi-automated approach for analyzing FDG PET/CT images in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) to standardize FDG PET application. METHODS: Patients (n = 8) with relapsed/refractory MM from the Phase 2 study (NCT02899052) of venetoclax plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone underwent FDG PET/CT at baseline and up to two timepoints during treatment. Images were processed using an established automated segmentation algorithm, with the modification that a red marrow region in an unaffected lumbar vertebra was used to define background standardized uptake value normalized to lean body mass (SUL) threshold above which uptake was considered disease-specific uptake. This approach was compared to lesion segmentation, and to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria, including minimal residual disease (MRD). RESULTS: The two FDG PET analysis techniques agreed on evaluation of patient-level SUL(peak) for 67% of scans. In the metabolic response assessment per PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), the two techniques agreed in 75% of patients. Differences between techniques occurred in low-uptake lesions due to greater reader sensitivity to lesions with uptake marginally above background. PERCIST outcomes were generally in agreement with IMWC and MRD. CONCLUSIONS: This semi-automated analysis was in high agreement with standard approaches for detecting response to MM therapy. This proof-of-concept study suggests that larger studies should be conducted to confirm how FDG PET analysis may aid early response detection in MM.