Cargando…

Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global public health crisis. Surveillance is a fundamental component in the monitoring and evaluation of AMR mitigation endeavours. The primary aim of the scoping review is to identify successes, barriers, and gaps in implementing AMR surveil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Do, Phu Cong, Assefa, Yibeltal Alemu, Batikawai, Suliasi Mekerusa, Reid, Simon Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08585-2
_version_ 1785105078762340352
author Do, Phu Cong
Assefa, Yibeltal Alemu
Batikawai, Suliasi Mekerusa
Reid, Simon Andrew
author_facet Do, Phu Cong
Assefa, Yibeltal Alemu
Batikawai, Suliasi Mekerusa
Reid, Simon Andrew
author_sort Do, Phu Cong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global public health crisis. Surveillance is a fundamental component in the monitoring and evaluation of AMR mitigation endeavours. The primary aim of the scoping review is to identify successes, barriers, and gaps in implementing AMR surveillance systems and utilising data from them. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically to identify literature pertaining to implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of AMR surveillance systems. A thematic analysis was conducted where themes within the literature were inductively grouped based on the described content. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 639 journal articles for screening. Following deduplication and screening, 46 articles were determined to be appropriate for inclusion. Generally, most studies focused on human AMR surveillance (n = 38, 82.6%). Regionally, there was equal focus on low- and middle-income countries (n = 7, 15.2%) and trans-national contexts (n = 7, 14.5%). All included articles (n = 46, 100.0%) discussed barriers to either implementing or utilising AMR surveillance systems. From the scoping review, 6 themes emerged: capacity for surveillance, data infrastructure, policy, representativeness, stakeholder engagement, and sustainability. Data infrastructure was most frequently discussed as problematic in evaluation of surveillance systems (n = 36, 75.0%). The most frequent success to surveillance system implementation was stakeholder engagement (n = 30, 65.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of AMR surveillance systems are diverse across contexts. There is a distinct separation of experiences between systems with emerging surveillance systems and those with established systems. Surveillance systems require extensive refinement to become representative and meet surveillance objectives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08585-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10496311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104963112023-09-13 Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review Do, Phu Cong Assefa, Yibeltal Alemu Batikawai, Suliasi Mekerusa Reid, Simon Andrew BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global public health crisis. Surveillance is a fundamental component in the monitoring and evaluation of AMR mitigation endeavours. The primary aim of the scoping review is to identify successes, barriers, and gaps in implementing AMR surveillance systems and utilising data from them. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched systematically to identify literature pertaining to implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of AMR surveillance systems. A thematic analysis was conducted where themes within the literature were inductively grouped based on the described content. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 639 journal articles for screening. Following deduplication and screening, 46 articles were determined to be appropriate for inclusion. Generally, most studies focused on human AMR surveillance (n = 38, 82.6%). Regionally, there was equal focus on low- and middle-income countries (n = 7, 15.2%) and trans-national contexts (n = 7, 14.5%). All included articles (n = 46, 100.0%) discussed barriers to either implementing or utilising AMR surveillance systems. From the scoping review, 6 themes emerged: capacity for surveillance, data infrastructure, policy, representativeness, stakeholder engagement, and sustainability. Data infrastructure was most frequently discussed as problematic in evaluation of surveillance systems (n = 36, 75.0%). The most frequent success to surveillance system implementation was stakeholder engagement (n = 30, 65.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Experiences of AMR surveillance systems are diverse across contexts. There is a distinct separation of experiences between systems with emerging surveillance systems and those with established systems. Surveillance systems require extensive refinement to become representative and meet surveillance objectives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08585-2. BioMed Central 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10496311/ /pubmed/37697310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08585-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Do, Phu Cong
Assefa, Yibeltal Alemu
Batikawai, Suliasi Mekerusa
Reid, Simon Andrew
Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
title Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
title_full Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
title_fullStr Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
title_short Strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
title_sort strengthening antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08585-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dophucong strengtheningantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystemsascopingreview
AT assefayibeltalalemu strengtheningantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystemsascopingreview
AT batikawaisuliasimekerusa strengtheningantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystemsascopingreview
AT reidsimonandrew strengtheningantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystemsascopingreview