Cargando…
Usefulness of the second heart sound for predicting pulmonary hypertension in patients with interstitial lung disease: Utilidade da segunda bulha cardíaca na predição de hipertensão pulmonar em portadores de doenças intersticiais pulmonares
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: P(2) hyperphonesis is considered to be a valuable finding in semiological diagnoses of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The aim here was to evaluate the accuracy of the pulmonary component of second heart sounds for predicting PH in patients with interstitial lung disease. DESIGN...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2015.00701207 |
Sumario: | CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: P(2) hyperphonesis is considered to be a valuable finding in semiological diagnoses of pulmonary hypertension (PH). The aim here was to evaluate the accuracy of the pulmonary component of second heart sounds for predicting PH in patients with interstitial lung disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study at the University of Brasilia and Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal. METHODS: Heart sounds were acquired using an electronic stethoscope and were analyzed using phonocardiography. Clinical signs suggestive of PH, such as second heart sound (S(2)) in pulmonary area louder than in aortic area; P(2) > A(2) in pulmonary area and P(2) present in mitral area, were compared with Doppler echocardiographic parameters suggestive of PH. Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp) and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between S(2) or P(2) amplitude and PASP (pulmonary artery systolic pressure) (P = 0.185 and 0.115; P= 0.13 and 0.34, respectively). Higher S(2) in pulmonary area than in aortic area, compared with all the criteria suggestive of PH, showed S = 60%, Sp= 22%; LR+ = 0.7; LR- = 1.7; while P(2)> A(2) showed S= 57%, Sp = 39%; LR+ = 0.9; LR- = 1.1; and P(2) in mitral area showed: S= 68%, Sp = 41%; LR+ = 1.1; LR- = 0.7. All these signals together showed: S= 50%, Sp = 56%. CONCLUSIONS: The semiological signs indicative of PH presented low sensitivity and specificity levels for clinically diagnosing this comorbidity. |
---|