Cargando…
Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years
OBJECTIVES: Publicly funded adult social care (ASC) in England aims to improve quality of life through the provision of services for individuals with care needs due to physical and/or mental impairment or illness. Access to these services, however, is often restricted to contain public expenditure....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37696632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070833 |
_version_ | 1785105159830896640 |
---|---|
author | Longo, Francesco Claxton, Karl Lomas, James Martin, Stephen |
author_facet | Longo, Francesco Claxton, Karl Lomas, James Martin, Stephen |
author_sort | Longo, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Publicly funded adult social care (ASC) in England aims to improve quality of life through the provision of services for individuals with care needs due to physical and/or mental impairment or illness. Access to these services, however, is often restricted to contain public expenditure. With a fast-growing care need, information on whether extending eligibility is good value for money becomes policy-relevant. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: This study investigates the effect of extending ASC eligibility on user care-related quality of life (CRQoL), a policy-relevant measure of quality of life. DESIGN: We use English cross-sectional survey data from 2017/2018 to 2019/2020 on users receiving publicly funded long-term support including domiciliary and other community-based social care, as well as residential and nursing care from local authorities responsible for ASC. We employ the two-stage least square method to estimate the impact of ASC expenditure on CRQoL at various levels of ASC expenditure in each financial year. This includes the CRQoL effect of increasing expenditure from zero to some level, which captures the effect of extending ASC eligibility to new users. RESULTS: We find that publicly funded ASC improves the CRQoL of both existing and newly eligible users, although the latter are likely to experience greater CRQoL gains. Moreover, from 2017/2018 to 2019/2020, spending as much as an average user for a newly eligible user costs between £54 224 and £77 778 per social care-quality-adjusted life year (SC-QALY) gained. These results are statistically significant at the 5% level. Compared with this finding, increasing expenditure for an existing user has always a higher cost per SC-QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Extending ASC eligibility to new users is likely to be more cost-effective compared with using the same resources to increase expenditure for existing users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10496707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104967072023-09-13 Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years Longo, Francesco Claxton, Karl Lomas, James Martin, Stephen BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Publicly funded adult social care (ASC) in England aims to improve quality of life through the provision of services for individuals with care needs due to physical and/or mental impairment or illness. Access to these services, however, is often restricted to contain public expenditure. With a fast-growing care need, information on whether extending eligibility is good value for money becomes policy-relevant. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: This study investigates the effect of extending ASC eligibility on user care-related quality of life (CRQoL), a policy-relevant measure of quality of life. DESIGN: We use English cross-sectional survey data from 2017/2018 to 2019/2020 on users receiving publicly funded long-term support including domiciliary and other community-based social care, as well as residential and nursing care from local authorities responsible for ASC. We employ the two-stage least square method to estimate the impact of ASC expenditure on CRQoL at various levels of ASC expenditure in each financial year. This includes the CRQoL effect of increasing expenditure from zero to some level, which captures the effect of extending ASC eligibility to new users. RESULTS: We find that publicly funded ASC improves the CRQoL of both existing and newly eligible users, although the latter are likely to experience greater CRQoL gains. Moreover, from 2017/2018 to 2019/2020, spending as much as an average user for a newly eligible user costs between £54 224 and £77 778 per social care-quality-adjusted life year (SC-QALY) gained. These results are statistically significant at the 5% level. Compared with this finding, increasing expenditure for an existing user has always a higher cost per SC-QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Extending ASC eligibility to new users is likely to be more cost-effective compared with using the same resources to increase expenditure for existing users. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10496707/ /pubmed/37696632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070833 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Longo, Francesco Claxton, Karl Lomas, James Martin, Stephen Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
title | Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
title_full | Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
title_fullStr | Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
title_full_unstemmed | Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
title_short | Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
title_sort | is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in england? a cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10496707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37696632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longofrancesco isextendingeligibilityforadultsocialcarebetterthaninvestingmoreinexistingusersinenglandacrosssectionalevidenceformultiplefinancialyears AT claxtonkarl isextendingeligibilityforadultsocialcarebetterthaninvestingmoreinexistingusersinenglandacrosssectionalevidenceformultiplefinancialyears AT lomasjames isextendingeligibilityforadultsocialcarebetterthaninvestingmoreinexistingusersinenglandacrosssectionalevidenceformultiplefinancialyears AT martinstephen isextendingeligibilityforadultsocialcarebetterthaninvestingmoreinexistingusersinenglandacrosssectionalevidenceformultiplefinancialyears |